Cargando…

Utility of screening tools to differentiate beta thalassemia trait and iron-deficiency anemia - do they serve a purpose in blood donors?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of the beta thalassemia trait (BTT) and differentiate it from iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) among blood donors. METHODS: A total of 1,000 samples from blood donors were subjected to complete hemogram with red blood cell indices. Further...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sundh, Amanpreet, Kaur, Paramjit, Palta, Anshu, Kaur, Gagandeep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Hematology; Korean Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation; Korean Society of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology; Korean Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32989178
http://dx.doi.org/10.5045/br.2020.2020219
_version_ 1783590596143742976
author Sundh, Amanpreet
Kaur, Paramjit
Palta, Anshu
Kaur, Gagandeep
author_facet Sundh, Amanpreet
Kaur, Paramjit
Palta, Anshu
Kaur, Gagandeep
author_sort Sundh, Amanpreet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of the beta thalassemia trait (BTT) and differentiate it from iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) among blood donors. METHODS: A total of 1,000 samples from blood donors were subjected to complete hemogram with red blood cell indices. Further, Mentzer index (MI) was calculated for samples with mean corpuscular volume (MCV) below 80 fL and mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) below 27 pg. Samples with Mentzer index <12 were subjected to naked-eye single-tube red cell osmotic fragility test (NESTROFT) followed by hemoglobin electrophoresis in positive cases. Serum ferritin was assessed in NESTROFT-negative cases. RESULTS: The prevalence of BTT among blood donors was 3.7% and that of microcytosis among donors was 8.6%. The prevalence of BTT among microcytic donors was 41.8% while that among those with IDA was 11.6%. A value of MI <13 was highly sensitive in the diagnosis of BTT. MI >13 was found to have both high specificity and high sensitivity for diagnosing IDA. CONCLUSION: A moderately high prevalence of BTT was observed among blood donors. Presently, no screening program is mandatory for screening of BTT among blood donors. Indices like MCV, MCH, and Mentzer Index were thus found to be effective to screen for BTT and IDA among blood donors, and NESTROFT was a cost-effective mass screening method to differentiate BTT and IDA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7536563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Society of Hematology; Korean Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation; Korean Society of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology; Korean Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75365632020-10-15 Utility of screening tools to differentiate beta thalassemia trait and iron-deficiency anemia - do they serve a purpose in blood donors? Sundh, Amanpreet Kaur, Paramjit Palta, Anshu Kaur, Gagandeep Blood Res Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of the beta thalassemia trait (BTT) and differentiate it from iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) among blood donors. METHODS: A total of 1,000 samples from blood donors were subjected to complete hemogram with red blood cell indices. Further, Mentzer index (MI) was calculated for samples with mean corpuscular volume (MCV) below 80 fL and mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) below 27 pg. Samples with Mentzer index <12 were subjected to naked-eye single-tube red cell osmotic fragility test (NESTROFT) followed by hemoglobin electrophoresis in positive cases. Serum ferritin was assessed in NESTROFT-negative cases. RESULTS: The prevalence of BTT among blood donors was 3.7% and that of microcytosis among donors was 8.6%. The prevalence of BTT among microcytic donors was 41.8% while that among those with IDA was 11.6%. A value of MI <13 was highly sensitive in the diagnosis of BTT. MI >13 was found to have both high specificity and high sensitivity for diagnosing IDA. CONCLUSION: A moderately high prevalence of BTT was observed among blood donors. Presently, no screening program is mandatory for screening of BTT among blood donors. Indices like MCV, MCH, and Mentzer Index were thus found to be effective to screen for BTT and IDA among blood donors, and NESTROFT was a cost-effective mass screening method to differentiate BTT and IDA. Korean Society of Hematology; Korean Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation; Korean Society of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology; Korean Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis 2020-09-30 2020-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7536563/ /pubmed/32989178 http://dx.doi.org/10.5045/br.2020.2020219 Text en © 2020 Korean Society of Hematology This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sundh, Amanpreet
Kaur, Paramjit
Palta, Anshu
Kaur, Gagandeep
Utility of screening tools to differentiate beta thalassemia trait and iron-deficiency anemia - do they serve a purpose in blood donors?
title Utility of screening tools to differentiate beta thalassemia trait and iron-deficiency anemia - do they serve a purpose in blood donors?
title_full Utility of screening tools to differentiate beta thalassemia trait and iron-deficiency anemia - do they serve a purpose in blood donors?
title_fullStr Utility of screening tools to differentiate beta thalassemia trait and iron-deficiency anemia - do they serve a purpose in blood donors?
title_full_unstemmed Utility of screening tools to differentiate beta thalassemia trait and iron-deficiency anemia - do they serve a purpose in blood donors?
title_short Utility of screening tools to differentiate beta thalassemia trait and iron-deficiency anemia - do they serve a purpose in blood donors?
title_sort utility of screening tools to differentiate beta thalassemia trait and iron-deficiency anemia - do they serve a purpose in blood donors?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32989178
http://dx.doi.org/10.5045/br.2020.2020219
work_keys_str_mv AT sundhamanpreet utilityofscreeningtoolstodifferentiatebetathalassemiatraitandirondeficiencyanemiadotheyserveapurposeinblooddonors
AT kaurparamjit utilityofscreeningtoolstodifferentiatebetathalassemiatraitandirondeficiencyanemiadotheyserveapurposeinblooddonors
AT paltaanshu utilityofscreeningtoolstodifferentiatebetathalassemiatraitandirondeficiencyanemiadotheyserveapurposeinblooddonors
AT kaurgagandeep utilityofscreeningtoolstodifferentiatebetathalassemiatraitandirondeficiencyanemiadotheyserveapurposeinblooddonors