Cargando…

Impact of anatomic site on antigen-presenting cells in cancer

Checkpoint blockade immunotherapy (CBT) can induce long-term clinical benefits in patients with advanced cancer; however, response rates to CBT vary by cancer type. Cancers of the skin, lung, and kidney are largely responsive to CBT, while cancers of the pancreas, ovary, breast, and metastatic lesio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zagorulya, Maria, Duong, Ellen, Spranger, Stefani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7537336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33020244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001204
_version_ 1783590654710906880
author Zagorulya, Maria
Duong, Ellen
Spranger, Stefani
author_facet Zagorulya, Maria
Duong, Ellen
Spranger, Stefani
author_sort Zagorulya, Maria
collection PubMed
description Checkpoint blockade immunotherapy (CBT) can induce long-term clinical benefits in patients with advanced cancer; however, response rates to CBT vary by cancer type. Cancers of the skin, lung, and kidney are largely responsive to CBT, while cancers of the pancreas, ovary, breast, and metastatic lesions to the liver respond poorly. The impact of tissue-resident immune cells on antitumor immunity is an emerging area of investigation. Recent evidence indicates that antitumor immune responses and efficacy of CBT depend on the tissue site of the tumor lesion. As myeloid cells are predominantly tissue-resident and can shape tumor-reactive T cell responses, it is conceivable that tissue-specific differences in their function underlie the tissue-site-dependent variability in CBT responses. Understanding the roles of tissue-specific myeloid cells in antitumor immunity can open new avenues for treatment design. In this review, we discuss the roles of tissue-specific antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in governing antitumor immune responses, with a particular focus on the contributions of tissue-specific dendritic cells. Using the framework of the Cancer-Immunity Cycle, we examine the contributions of tissue-specific APC in CBT-sensitive and CBT-resistant carcinomas, highlight how these cells can be therapeutically modulated, and identify gaps in knowledge that remain to be addressed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7537336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75373362020-10-07 Impact of anatomic site on antigen-presenting cells in cancer Zagorulya, Maria Duong, Ellen Spranger, Stefani J Immunother Cancer Review Checkpoint blockade immunotherapy (CBT) can induce long-term clinical benefits in patients with advanced cancer; however, response rates to CBT vary by cancer type. Cancers of the skin, lung, and kidney are largely responsive to CBT, while cancers of the pancreas, ovary, breast, and metastatic lesions to the liver respond poorly. The impact of tissue-resident immune cells on antitumor immunity is an emerging area of investigation. Recent evidence indicates that antitumor immune responses and efficacy of CBT depend on the tissue site of the tumor lesion. As myeloid cells are predominantly tissue-resident and can shape tumor-reactive T cell responses, it is conceivable that tissue-specific differences in their function underlie the tissue-site-dependent variability in CBT responses. Understanding the roles of tissue-specific myeloid cells in antitumor immunity can open new avenues for treatment design. In this review, we discuss the roles of tissue-specific antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in governing antitumor immune responses, with a particular focus on the contributions of tissue-specific dendritic cells. Using the framework of the Cancer-Immunity Cycle, we examine the contributions of tissue-specific APC in CBT-sensitive and CBT-resistant carcinomas, highlight how these cells can be therapeutically modulated, and identify gaps in knowledge that remain to be addressed. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7537336/ /pubmed/33020244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001204 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Zagorulya, Maria
Duong, Ellen
Spranger, Stefani
Impact of anatomic site on antigen-presenting cells in cancer
title Impact of anatomic site on antigen-presenting cells in cancer
title_full Impact of anatomic site on antigen-presenting cells in cancer
title_fullStr Impact of anatomic site on antigen-presenting cells in cancer
title_full_unstemmed Impact of anatomic site on antigen-presenting cells in cancer
title_short Impact of anatomic site on antigen-presenting cells in cancer
title_sort impact of anatomic site on antigen-presenting cells in cancer
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7537336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33020244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001204
work_keys_str_mv AT zagorulyamaria impactofanatomicsiteonantigenpresentingcellsincancer
AT duongellen impactofanatomicsiteonantigenpresentingcellsincancer
AT sprangerstefani impactofanatomicsiteonantigenpresentingcellsincancer