Cargando…

Outbreak response intervention models of vaccine-preventable diseases in humans and foot-and-mouth disease in livestock: a protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases continue to threaten public health, despite the proven effectiveness of vaccines. Interventions such as vaccination, social distancing and palliative care are usually implemented, either individually or in combination, to control these outbreak...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azam, James M, Are, Elisha B, Pang, Xiaoxi, Ferrari, Matthew J, Pulliam, Juliet R C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7537453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33020081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036172
_version_ 1783590676942815232
author Azam, James M
Are, Elisha B
Pang, Xiaoxi
Ferrari, Matthew J
Pulliam, Juliet R C
author_facet Azam, James M
Are, Elisha B
Pang, Xiaoxi
Ferrari, Matthew J
Pulliam, Juliet R C
author_sort Azam, James M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases continue to threaten public health, despite the proven effectiveness of vaccines. Interventions such as vaccination, social distancing and palliative care are usually implemented, either individually or in combination, to control these outbreaks. Mathematical models are often used to assess the impact of these interventions and for supporting outbreak response decision making. The objectives of this systematic review, which covers all human vaccine-preventable diseases, are to determine the relative impact of vaccination compared with other outbreak interventions, and to ascertain the temporal trends in the use of modelling in outbreak response decision making. We will also identify gaps and opportunities for future research through a comparison with the foot-and-mouth disease outbreak response modelling literature, which has good examples of the use of modelling to inform outbreak response intervention decision making. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We searched on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar and some preprint servers from the start of indexing to 15 January 2020. Inclusion: modelling studies, published in English, that use a mechanistic approach to evaluate the impact of an outbreak intervention. Exclusion: reviews, and studies that do not describe or use mechanistic models or do not describe an outbreak. We will extract data from the included studies such as their objectives, model types and composition, and conclusions on the impact of the intervention. We will ascertain the impact of models on outbreak response decision making through visualisation of time trends in the use of the models. We will also present our results in narrative style. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review will not require any ethics approval since it only involves scientific articles. The review will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and at various conferences fitting its scope. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020160803.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7537453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75374532020-10-07 Outbreak response intervention models of vaccine-preventable diseases in humans and foot-and-mouth disease in livestock: a protocol for a systematic review Azam, James M Are, Elisha B Pang, Xiaoxi Ferrari, Matthew J Pulliam, Juliet R C BMJ Open Epidemiology INTRODUCTION: Outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases continue to threaten public health, despite the proven effectiveness of vaccines. Interventions such as vaccination, social distancing and palliative care are usually implemented, either individually or in combination, to control these outbreaks. Mathematical models are often used to assess the impact of these interventions and for supporting outbreak response decision making. The objectives of this systematic review, which covers all human vaccine-preventable diseases, are to determine the relative impact of vaccination compared with other outbreak interventions, and to ascertain the temporal trends in the use of modelling in outbreak response decision making. We will also identify gaps and opportunities for future research through a comparison with the foot-and-mouth disease outbreak response modelling literature, which has good examples of the use of modelling to inform outbreak response intervention decision making. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We searched on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar and some preprint servers from the start of indexing to 15 January 2020. Inclusion: modelling studies, published in English, that use a mechanistic approach to evaluate the impact of an outbreak intervention. Exclusion: reviews, and studies that do not describe or use mechanistic models or do not describe an outbreak. We will extract data from the included studies such as their objectives, model types and composition, and conclusions on the impact of the intervention. We will ascertain the impact of models on outbreak response decision making through visualisation of time trends in the use of the models. We will also present our results in narrative style. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review will not require any ethics approval since it only involves scientific articles. The review will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and at various conferences fitting its scope. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020160803. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7537453/ /pubmed/33020081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036172 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Azam, James M
Are, Elisha B
Pang, Xiaoxi
Ferrari, Matthew J
Pulliam, Juliet R C
Outbreak response intervention models of vaccine-preventable diseases in humans and foot-and-mouth disease in livestock: a protocol for a systematic review
title Outbreak response intervention models of vaccine-preventable diseases in humans and foot-and-mouth disease in livestock: a protocol for a systematic review
title_full Outbreak response intervention models of vaccine-preventable diseases in humans and foot-and-mouth disease in livestock: a protocol for a systematic review
title_fullStr Outbreak response intervention models of vaccine-preventable diseases in humans and foot-and-mouth disease in livestock: a protocol for a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Outbreak response intervention models of vaccine-preventable diseases in humans and foot-and-mouth disease in livestock: a protocol for a systematic review
title_short Outbreak response intervention models of vaccine-preventable diseases in humans and foot-and-mouth disease in livestock: a protocol for a systematic review
title_sort outbreak response intervention models of vaccine-preventable diseases in humans and foot-and-mouth disease in livestock: a protocol for a systematic review
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7537453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33020081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036172
work_keys_str_mv AT azamjamesm outbreakresponseinterventionmodelsofvaccinepreventablediseasesinhumansandfootandmouthdiseaseinlivestockaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT areelishab outbreakresponseinterventionmodelsofvaccinepreventablediseasesinhumansandfootandmouthdiseaseinlivestockaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT pangxiaoxi outbreakresponseinterventionmodelsofvaccinepreventablediseasesinhumansandfootandmouthdiseaseinlivestockaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT ferrarimatthewj outbreakresponseinterventionmodelsofvaccinepreventablediseasesinhumansandfootandmouthdiseaseinlivestockaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT pulliamjulietrc outbreakresponseinterventionmodelsofvaccinepreventablediseasesinhumansandfootandmouthdiseaseinlivestockaprotocolforasystematicreview