Cargando…

The first eight months of Sweden’s COVID‐19 strategy and the key actions and actors that were involved

AIM: COVID‐19 has affected millions of people worldwide. This paper reviews the Swedish pandemic response. METHODS: A narrative review was carried out and a timeline constructed. RESULTS: By September 1, 2020, 0.8% of Swedish residents had tested positive for the virus and 0.06% of the population ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ludvigsson, Jonas F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7537539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32951258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.15582
_version_ 1783590687015436288
author Ludvigsson, Jonas F.
author_facet Ludvigsson, Jonas F.
author_sort Ludvigsson, Jonas F.
collection PubMed
description AIM: COVID‐19 has affected millions of people worldwide. This paper reviews the Swedish pandemic response. METHODS: A narrative review was carried out and a timeline constructed. RESULTS: By September 1, 2020, 0.8% of Swedish residents had tested positive for the virus and 0.06% of the population had died, which was higher than neighbouring Nordic countries, but lower than some European countries with general lockdowns. The main actors were the Public Health Agency, the National Board of Health and Welfare, the Civil Contingencies Agency and the Government. County councils and regions implemented policies, in conjunction with the Department of Education and county administrative boards. Sweden's response was less invasive than many other countries, with no general lockdown. It focused on mitigation: slowing, but not stopping, the pandemic. Physical distancing was recommended in public spaces, but mandatory in bars, restaurants and at events. Visits to nursing facilities were banned. Kindergartens and schools for children up to 16 stayed open, but closed for older children for three months. There were no enforced quarantines for infected households or geographical regions, and facemasks were not recommended outside health care. CONCLUSION: Sweden chose a different pandemic strategy to its peer nations. This paper examines the first eight months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7537539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75375392020-10-07 The first eight months of Sweden’s COVID‐19 strategy and the key actions and actors that were involved Ludvigsson, Jonas F. Acta Paediatr Review Articles AIM: COVID‐19 has affected millions of people worldwide. This paper reviews the Swedish pandemic response. METHODS: A narrative review was carried out and a timeline constructed. RESULTS: By September 1, 2020, 0.8% of Swedish residents had tested positive for the virus and 0.06% of the population had died, which was higher than neighbouring Nordic countries, but lower than some European countries with general lockdowns. The main actors were the Public Health Agency, the National Board of Health and Welfare, the Civil Contingencies Agency and the Government. County councils and regions implemented policies, in conjunction with the Department of Education and county administrative boards. Sweden's response was less invasive than many other countries, with no general lockdown. It focused on mitigation: slowing, but not stopping, the pandemic. Physical distancing was recommended in public spaces, but mandatory in bars, restaurants and at events. Visits to nursing facilities were banned. Kindergartens and schools for children up to 16 stayed open, but closed for older children for three months. There were no enforced quarantines for infected households or geographical regions, and facemasks were not recommended outside health care. CONCLUSION: Sweden chose a different pandemic strategy to its peer nations. This paper examines the first eight months. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-11 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7537539/ /pubmed/32951258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.15582 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Acta Paediatrica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation Acta Paediatrica https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Ludvigsson, Jonas F.
The first eight months of Sweden’s COVID‐19 strategy and the key actions and actors that were involved
title The first eight months of Sweden’s COVID‐19 strategy and the key actions and actors that were involved
title_full The first eight months of Sweden’s COVID‐19 strategy and the key actions and actors that were involved
title_fullStr The first eight months of Sweden’s COVID‐19 strategy and the key actions and actors that were involved
title_full_unstemmed The first eight months of Sweden’s COVID‐19 strategy and the key actions and actors that were involved
title_short The first eight months of Sweden’s COVID‐19 strategy and the key actions and actors that were involved
title_sort first eight months of sweden’s covid‐19 strategy and the key actions and actors that were involved
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7537539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32951258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.15582
work_keys_str_mv AT ludvigssonjonasf thefirsteightmonthsofswedenscovid19strategyandthekeyactionsandactorsthatwereinvolved
AT ludvigssonjonasf firsteightmonthsofswedenscovid19strategyandthekeyactionsandactorsthatwereinvolved