Cargando…

Comparing Associations of State Reopening Strategies with COVID-19 Burden

BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infected over 5 million United States (US) residents resulting in more than 180,000 deaths by August 2020. To mitigate transmission, most states ordered shelter-in-place orders in March and reopening strategies varied. OBJECTIVE: To estimate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaufman, Brystana G., Whitaker, Rebecca, Mahendraratnam, Nirosha, Smith, Valerie A., McClellan, Mark B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7537575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33021717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06277-0
_version_ 1783590693200986112
author Kaufman, Brystana G.
Whitaker, Rebecca
Mahendraratnam, Nirosha
Smith, Valerie A.
McClellan, Mark B.
author_facet Kaufman, Brystana G.
Whitaker, Rebecca
Mahendraratnam, Nirosha
Smith, Valerie A.
McClellan, Mark B.
author_sort Kaufman, Brystana G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infected over 5 million United States (US) residents resulting in more than 180,000 deaths by August 2020. To mitigate transmission, most states ordered shelter-in-place orders in March and reopening strategies varied. OBJECTIVE: To estimate excess COVID-19 cases and deaths after reopening compared with trends prior to reopening for two groups of states: (1) states with an evidence-based reopening strategy, defined as reopening indoor dining after implementing a statewide mask mandate, and (2) states reopening indoor dining rooms before implementing a statewide mask mandate. DESIGN: Interrupted time series quasi-experimental study design applied to publicly available secondary data. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty United States and the District of Columbia. INTERVENTIONS: Reopening indoor dining rooms before or after implementing a statewide mask mandate. MAIN MEASURES: Outcomes included daily cumulative COVID-19 cases and deaths for each state. KEY RESULTS: On average, the number of excess cases per 100,000 residents in states reopening without masks is ten times the number in states reopening with masks after 8 weeks (643.1 cases; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 406.9, 879.2 and 62.9 cases; CI = 12.6, 113.1, respectively). Excess cases after 6 weeks could have been reduced by 90% from 576,371 to 63,062 and excess deaths reduced by 80% from 22,851 to 4858 had states implemented mask mandates prior to reopening. Over 50,000 excess deaths were prevented within 6 weeks in 13 states that implemented mask mandates prior to reopening. CONCLUSIONS: Additional mitigation measures such as mask use counteract the potential growth in COVID-19 cases and deaths due to reopening businesses. This study contributes to the growing evidence that mask usage is essential for mitigating community transmission of COVID-19. States should delay further reopening until mask mandates are fully implemented, and enforcement by local businesses will be critical for preventing potential future closures. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11606-020-06277-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7537575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75375752020-10-07 Comparing Associations of State Reopening Strategies with COVID-19 Burden Kaufman, Brystana G. Whitaker, Rebecca Mahendraratnam, Nirosha Smith, Valerie A. McClellan, Mark B. J Gen Intern Med Original Research BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infected over 5 million United States (US) residents resulting in more than 180,000 deaths by August 2020. To mitigate transmission, most states ordered shelter-in-place orders in March and reopening strategies varied. OBJECTIVE: To estimate excess COVID-19 cases and deaths after reopening compared with trends prior to reopening for two groups of states: (1) states with an evidence-based reopening strategy, defined as reopening indoor dining after implementing a statewide mask mandate, and (2) states reopening indoor dining rooms before implementing a statewide mask mandate. DESIGN: Interrupted time series quasi-experimental study design applied to publicly available secondary data. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty United States and the District of Columbia. INTERVENTIONS: Reopening indoor dining rooms before or after implementing a statewide mask mandate. MAIN MEASURES: Outcomes included daily cumulative COVID-19 cases and deaths for each state. KEY RESULTS: On average, the number of excess cases per 100,000 residents in states reopening without masks is ten times the number in states reopening with masks after 8 weeks (643.1 cases; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 406.9, 879.2 and 62.9 cases; CI = 12.6, 113.1, respectively). Excess cases after 6 weeks could have been reduced by 90% from 576,371 to 63,062 and excess deaths reduced by 80% from 22,851 to 4858 had states implemented mask mandates prior to reopening. Over 50,000 excess deaths were prevented within 6 weeks in 13 states that implemented mask mandates prior to reopening. CONCLUSIONS: Additional mitigation measures such as mask use counteract the potential growth in COVID-19 cases and deaths due to reopening businesses. This study contributes to the growing evidence that mask usage is essential for mitigating community transmission of COVID-19. States should delay further reopening until mask mandates are fully implemented, and enforcement by local businesses will be critical for preventing potential future closures. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11606-020-06277-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-10-06 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7537575/ /pubmed/33021717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06277-0 Text en © Society of General Internal Medicine 2020
spellingShingle Original Research
Kaufman, Brystana G.
Whitaker, Rebecca
Mahendraratnam, Nirosha
Smith, Valerie A.
McClellan, Mark B.
Comparing Associations of State Reopening Strategies with COVID-19 Burden
title Comparing Associations of State Reopening Strategies with COVID-19 Burden
title_full Comparing Associations of State Reopening Strategies with COVID-19 Burden
title_fullStr Comparing Associations of State Reopening Strategies with COVID-19 Burden
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Associations of State Reopening Strategies with COVID-19 Burden
title_short Comparing Associations of State Reopening Strategies with COVID-19 Burden
title_sort comparing associations of state reopening strategies with covid-19 burden
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7537575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33021717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06277-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kaufmanbrystanag comparingassociationsofstatereopeningstrategieswithcovid19burden
AT whitakerrebecca comparingassociationsofstatereopeningstrategieswithcovid19burden
AT mahendraratnamnirosha comparingassociationsofstatereopeningstrategieswithcovid19burden
AT smithvaleriea comparingassociationsofstatereopeningstrategieswithcovid19burden
AT mcclellanmarkb comparingassociationsofstatereopeningstrategieswithcovid19burden