Cargando…

An in vitro comparative evaluation of the effect of three endodontic chelating agents (17% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, 1% peracetic acid, 0.2% chitosan) on the push out bond strength of gutta percha with a new bioceramic sealer (BioRoot RCS)

AIM: This study aims to evaluate the effect of three endodontic chelating agents (17% ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid [EDTA], 1% peracetic acid [PAA], 0.2% Chitosan) on the push out bond strength of gutta percha with a new bioceramic sealer (BioRoot RCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight single-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agarwal, Sunny, Raghu, Ramya, Shetty, Ashish, Gautham, P. M., Souparnika, D. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7537746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33082665
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_90_20
_version_ 1783590726578208768
author Agarwal, Sunny
Raghu, Ramya
Shetty, Ashish
Gautham, P. M.
Souparnika, D. P.
author_facet Agarwal, Sunny
Raghu, Ramya
Shetty, Ashish
Gautham, P. M.
Souparnika, D. P.
author_sort Agarwal, Sunny
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study aims to evaluate the effect of three endodontic chelating agents (17% ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid [EDTA], 1% peracetic acid [PAA], 0.2% Chitosan) on the push out bond strength of gutta percha with a new bioceramic sealer (BioRoot RCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight single-rooted mandibular premolars were selected and decoronated to obtain standardized root length of 15 mm. The root canals were prepared up to #30 files (Hyflex CM) and copious irrigation was done with 3 ml of 5.25% of NaOCl. According to the final irrigation, specimens were divided into three groups: Group 1 (n = 16) 0.2% chitosan, Group 2 (n = 16) 17% EDTA, and Group 3 (n = 16) 1% PAA for 1 min. Samples from each group were obturated with bioceramic sealer and gutta percha and sealed with temporary filling material. Two horizontal slices of 2 mm was obtained from the middle third of each sample (n = 32). Push out bond strength and failure modes were assessed. Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Mann–Whitney post hoc analysis was used for push out analysis. Chi square test was used to compare the modes of failure. The statistical significance level was set at P = 0.05. RESULTS: The highest push out bond strength was obtained with Group 1 (0.2% chitosan) followed by Group 3 (1% PAA). Group 2 (17% EDTA) showed least push out bond strength when compared to Group 1 (0.2% chitosan) and Group 3 (1% PAA). The mode of failure was mainly cohesive for all groups. CONCLUSIONS: The highest push-out bond strength of BioRoot RCS was seen after treatment with 0.2% chitosan while the least was after EDTA treatment. 1% PAA treatment also favorably affected push-out bond strength of BioRoot RCS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7537746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75377462020-10-19 An in vitro comparative evaluation of the effect of three endodontic chelating agents (17% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, 1% peracetic acid, 0.2% chitosan) on the push out bond strength of gutta percha with a new bioceramic sealer (BioRoot RCS) Agarwal, Sunny Raghu, Ramya Shetty, Ashish Gautham, P. M. Souparnika, D. P. J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: This study aims to evaluate the effect of three endodontic chelating agents (17% ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid [EDTA], 1% peracetic acid [PAA], 0.2% Chitosan) on the push out bond strength of gutta percha with a new bioceramic sealer (BioRoot RCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight single-rooted mandibular premolars were selected and decoronated to obtain standardized root length of 15 mm. The root canals were prepared up to #30 files (Hyflex CM) and copious irrigation was done with 3 ml of 5.25% of NaOCl. According to the final irrigation, specimens were divided into three groups: Group 1 (n = 16) 0.2% chitosan, Group 2 (n = 16) 17% EDTA, and Group 3 (n = 16) 1% PAA for 1 min. Samples from each group were obturated with bioceramic sealer and gutta percha and sealed with temporary filling material. Two horizontal slices of 2 mm was obtained from the middle third of each sample (n = 32). Push out bond strength and failure modes were assessed. Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Mann–Whitney post hoc analysis was used for push out analysis. Chi square test was used to compare the modes of failure. The statistical significance level was set at P = 0.05. RESULTS: The highest push out bond strength was obtained with Group 1 (0.2% chitosan) followed by Group 3 (1% PAA). Group 2 (17% EDTA) showed least push out bond strength when compared to Group 1 (0.2% chitosan) and Group 3 (1% PAA). The mode of failure was mainly cohesive for all groups. CONCLUSIONS: The highest push-out bond strength of BioRoot RCS was seen after treatment with 0.2% chitosan while the least was after EDTA treatment. 1% PAA treatment also favorably affected push-out bond strength of BioRoot RCS. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7537746/ /pubmed/33082665 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_90_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Agarwal, Sunny
Raghu, Ramya
Shetty, Ashish
Gautham, P. M.
Souparnika, D. P.
An in vitro comparative evaluation of the effect of three endodontic chelating agents (17% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, 1% peracetic acid, 0.2% chitosan) on the push out bond strength of gutta percha with a new bioceramic sealer (BioRoot RCS)
title An in vitro comparative evaluation of the effect of three endodontic chelating agents (17% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, 1% peracetic acid, 0.2% chitosan) on the push out bond strength of gutta percha with a new bioceramic sealer (BioRoot RCS)
title_full An in vitro comparative evaluation of the effect of three endodontic chelating agents (17% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, 1% peracetic acid, 0.2% chitosan) on the push out bond strength of gutta percha with a new bioceramic sealer (BioRoot RCS)
title_fullStr An in vitro comparative evaluation of the effect of three endodontic chelating agents (17% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, 1% peracetic acid, 0.2% chitosan) on the push out bond strength of gutta percha with a new bioceramic sealer (BioRoot RCS)
title_full_unstemmed An in vitro comparative evaluation of the effect of three endodontic chelating agents (17% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, 1% peracetic acid, 0.2% chitosan) on the push out bond strength of gutta percha with a new bioceramic sealer (BioRoot RCS)
title_short An in vitro comparative evaluation of the effect of three endodontic chelating agents (17% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, 1% peracetic acid, 0.2% chitosan) on the push out bond strength of gutta percha with a new bioceramic sealer (BioRoot RCS)
title_sort in vitro comparative evaluation of the effect of three endodontic chelating agents (17% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, 1% peracetic acid, 0.2% chitosan) on the push out bond strength of gutta percha with a new bioceramic sealer (bioroot rcs)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7537746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33082665
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_90_20
work_keys_str_mv AT agarwalsunny aninvitrocomparativeevaluationoftheeffectofthreeendodonticchelatingagents17ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid1peraceticacid02chitosanonthepushoutbondstrengthofguttaperchawithanewbioceramicsealerbiorootrcs
AT raghuramya aninvitrocomparativeevaluationoftheeffectofthreeendodonticchelatingagents17ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid1peraceticacid02chitosanonthepushoutbondstrengthofguttaperchawithanewbioceramicsealerbiorootrcs
AT shettyashish aninvitrocomparativeevaluationoftheeffectofthreeendodonticchelatingagents17ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid1peraceticacid02chitosanonthepushoutbondstrengthofguttaperchawithanewbioceramicsealerbiorootrcs
AT gauthampm aninvitrocomparativeevaluationoftheeffectofthreeendodonticchelatingagents17ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid1peraceticacid02chitosanonthepushoutbondstrengthofguttaperchawithanewbioceramicsealerbiorootrcs
AT souparnikadp aninvitrocomparativeevaluationoftheeffectofthreeendodonticchelatingagents17ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid1peraceticacid02chitosanonthepushoutbondstrengthofguttaperchawithanewbioceramicsealerbiorootrcs
AT agarwalsunny invitrocomparativeevaluationoftheeffectofthreeendodonticchelatingagents17ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid1peraceticacid02chitosanonthepushoutbondstrengthofguttaperchawithanewbioceramicsealerbiorootrcs
AT raghuramya invitrocomparativeevaluationoftheeffectofthreeendodonticchelatingagents17ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid1peraceticacid02chitosanonthepushoutbondstrengthofguttaperchawithanewbioceramicsealerbiorootrcs
AT shettyashish invitrocomparativeevaluationoftheeffectofthreeendodonticchelatingagents17ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid1peraceticacid02chitosanonthepushoutbondstrengthofguttaperchawithanewbioceramicsealerbiorootrcs
AT gauthampm invitrocomparativeevaluationoftheeffectofthreeendodonticchelatingagents17ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid1peraceticacid02chitosanonthepushoutbondstrengthofguttaperchawithanewbioceramicsealerbiorootrcs
AT souparnikadp invitrocomparativeevaluationoftheeffectofthreeendodonticchelatingagents17ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid1peraceticacid02chitosanonthepushoutbondstrengthofguttaperchawithanewbioceramicsealerbiorootrcs