Cargando…

Clinical verification of (18)F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer

PURPOSE: Radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is the current standard-of-care for lesion detection in patients with biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer (PCa). However, rigorous verification of detected lesions is not always performed in routine clinical practice. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meijer, Dennie, Jansen, Bernard H. E., Wondergem, Maurits, Bodar, Yves J. L., Srbljin, Sandra, Vellekoop, Annelies E., Keizer, Bram, van der Zant, Friso M., Hoekstra, Otto S., Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A., Dahele, Max, Vis, André N., Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7537873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33021980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239414
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is the current standard-of-care for lesion detection in patients with biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer (PCa). However, rigorous verification of detected lesions is not always performed in routine clinical practice. To aid future (18)F-radiolabeled PSMA PET/CT interpretation, we aimed to identify clinical/imaging characteristics that increase the likelihood that a PSMA-avid lesion is malignant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 262 patients with BCR, who underwent (18)F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT, were retrospectively analyzed. The malignant nature of (18)F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions was verified through any of the following metrics: (1) positive histopathological examination; (2) additional positive imaging; (3) a ≥50% decrease in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) following irradiation of the lesion(s). RESULTS: In 226/262 PET scans (86.3%) at least one lesion suspicious for recurrent PCa was detected (‘positive scan’). In 84/226 positive scans (37.2%), at least one independent verification metric was available. PSMA PET-detected lesions were most often confirmed to be malignant (PCa) in the presence of a CT-substrate (96.5% vs. 55.6% without CT-substrate), with SUV(peak) ≥3.5 (91.4% vs. 60.0% with SUV(peak)<3.5), in patients with a PSA-level ≥2.0 ng/mL (83.7% vs. 65.7% in patients with PSA <2.0ng/mL) and in patients with >2 PET-positive lesions (94.1% vs. 64.2% in patients with 1–2 PET-positive lesions; p<0.001–0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the clinical verification of (18)F-DCFPyL PET-positive lesions in patients with BCR was performed. Diagnostic certainty of PET-detected lesions increases in the presence of characteristic abnormalities on CT, when SUV(peak) is ≥3.5, when PSA-levels exceed 2.0 ng/mL or in patients with more than two PET-positive lesions.