Cargando…
Clinical verification of (18)F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer
PURPOSE: Radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is the current standard-of-care for lesion detection in patients with biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer (PCa). However, rigorous verification of detected lesions is not always performed in routine clinical practice. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7537873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33021980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239414 |
_version_ | 1783590751869861888 |
---|---|
author | Meijer, Dennie Jansen, Bernard H. E. Wondergem, Maurits Bodar, Yves J. L. Srbljin, Sandra Vellekoop, Annelies E. Keizer, Bram van der Zant, Friso M. Hoekstra, Otto S. Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A. Dahele, Max Vis, André N. Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. |
author_facet | Meijer, Dennie Jansen, Bernard H. E. Wondergem, Maurits Bodar, Yves J. L. Srbljin, Sandra Vellekoop, Annelies E. Keizer, Bram van der Zant, Friso M. Hoekstra, Otto S. Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A. Dahele, Max Vis, André N. Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. |
author_sort | Meijer, Dennie |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is the current standard-of-care for lesion detection in patients with biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer (PCa). However, rigorous verification of detected lesions is not always performed in routine clinical practice. To aid future (18)F-radiolabeled PSMA PET/CT interpretation, we aimed to identify clinical/imaging characteristics that increase the likelihood that a PSMA-avid lesion is malignant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 262 patients with BCR, who underwent (18)F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT, were retrospectively analyzed. The malignant nature of (18)F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions was verified through any of the following metrics: (1) positive histopathological examination; (2) additional positive imaging; (3) a ≥50% decrease in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) following irradiation of the lesion(s). RESULTS: In 226/262 PET scans (86.3%) at least one lesion suspicious for recurrent PCa was detected (‘positive scan’). In 84/226 positive scans (37.2%), at least one independent verification metric was available. PSMA PET-detected lesions were most often confirmed to be malignant (PCa) in the presence of a CT-substrate (96.5% vs. 55.6% without CT-substrate), with SUV(peak) ≥3.5 (91.4% vs. 60.0% with SUV(peak)<3.5), in patients with a PSA-level ≥2.0 ng/mL (83.7% vs. 65.7% in patients with PSA <2.0ng/mL) and in patients with >2 PET-positive lesions (94.1% vs. 64.2% in patients with 1–2 PET-positive lesions; p<0.001–0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the clinical verification of (18)F-DCFPyL PET-positive lesions in patients with BCR was performed. Diagnostic certainty of PET-detected lesions increases in the presence of characteristic abnormalities on CT, when SUV(peak) is ≥3.5, when PSA-levels exceed 2.0 ng/mL or in patients with more than two PET-positive lesions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7537873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75378732020-10-15 Clinical verification of (18)F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer Meijer, Dennie Jansen, Bernard H. E. Wondergem, Maurits Bodar, Yves J. L. Srbljin, Sandra Vellekoop, Annelies E. Keizer, Bram van der Zant, Friso M. Hoekstra, Otto S. Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A. Dahele, Max Vis, André N. Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is the current standard-of-care for lesion detection in patients with biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer (PCa). However, rigorous verification of detected lesions is not always performed in routine clinical practice. To aid future (18)F-radiolabeled PSMA PET/CT interpretation, we aimed to identify clinical/imaging characteristics that increase the likelihood that a PSMA-avid lesion is malignant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 262 patients with BCR, who underwent (18)F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT, were retrospectively analyzed. The malignant nature of (18)F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions was verified through any of the following metrics: (1) positive histopathological examination; (2) additional positive imaging; (3) a ≥50% decrease in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) following irradiation of the lesion(s). RESULTS: In 226/262 PET scans (86.3%) at least one lesion suspicious for recurrent PCa was detected (‘positive scan’). In 84/226 positive scans (37.2%), at least one independent verification metric was available. PSMA PET-detected lesions were most often confirmed to be malignant (PCa) in the presence of a CT-substrate (96.5% vs. 55.6% without CT-substrate), with SUV(peak) ≥3.5 (91.4% vs. 60.0% with SUV(peak)<3.5), in patients with a PSA-level ≥2.0 ng/mL (83.7% vs. 65.7% in patients with PSA <2.0ng/mL) and in patients with >2 PET-positive lesions (94.1% vs. 64.2% in patients with 1–2 PET-positive lesions; p<0.001–0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the clinical verification of (18)F-DCFPyL PET-positive lesions in patients with BCR was performed. Diagnostic certainty of PET-detected lesions increases in the presence of characteristic abnormalities on CT, when SUV(peak) is ≥3.5, when PSA-levels exceed 2.0 ng/mL or in patients with more than two PET-positive lesions. Public Library of Science 2020-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7537873/ /pubmed/33021980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239414 Text en © 2020 Meijer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Meijer, Dennie Jansen, Bernard H. E. Wondergem, Maurits Bodar, Yves J. L. Srbljin, Sandra Vellekoop, Annelies E. Keizer, Bram van der Zant, Friso M. Hoekstra, Otto S. Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A. Dahele, Max Vis, André N. Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. Clinical verification of (18)F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer |
title | Clinical verification of (18)F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer |
title_full | Clinical verification of (18)F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Clinical verification of (18)F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical verification of (18)F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer |
title_short | Clinical verification of (18)F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer |
title_sort | clinical verification of (18)f-dcfpyl pet-detected lesions in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7537873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33021980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239414 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meijerdennie clinicalverificationof18fdcfpylpetdetectedlesionsinpatientswithbiochemicallyrecurrentprostatecancer AT jansenbernardhe clinicalverificationof18fdcfpylpetdetectedlesionsinpatientswithbiochemicallyrecurrentprostatecancer AT wondergemmaurits clinicalverificationof18fdcfpylpetdetectedlesionsinpatientswithbiochemicallyrecurrentprostatecancer AT bodaryvesjl clinicalverificationof18fdcfpylpetdetectedlesionsinpatientswithbiochemicallyrecurrentprostatecancer AT srbljinsandra clinicalverificationof18fdcfpylpetdetectedlesionsinpatientswithbiochemicallyrecurrentprostatecancer AT vellekoopanneliese clinicalverificationof18fdcfpylpetdetectedlesionsinpatientswithbiochemicallyrecurrentprostatecancer AT keizerbram clinicalverificationof18fdcfpylpetdetectedlesionsinpatientswithbiochemicallyrecurrentprostatecancer AT vanderzantfrisom clinicalverificationof18fdcfpylpetdetectedlesionsinpatientswithbiochemicallyrecurrentprostatecancer AT hoekstraottos clinicalverificationof18fdcfpylpetdetectedlesionsinpatientswithbiochemicallyrecurrentprostatecancer AT nieuwenhuijzenjakkoa clinicalverificationof18fdcfpylpetdetectedlesionsinpatientswithbiochemicallyrecurrentprostatecancer AT dahelemax clinicalverificationof18fdcfpylpetdetectedlesionsinpatientswithbiochemicallyrecurrentprostatecancer AT visandren clinicalverificationof18fdcfpylpetdetectedlesionsinpatientswithbiochemicallyrecurrentprostatecancer AT oprealagerdanielae clinicalverificationof18fdcfpylpetdetectedlesionsinpatientswithbiochemicallyrecurrentprostatecancer |