Cargando…

Impact of lowering the risk threshold for statin treatment on statin prescribing: a descriptive study in English primary care

BACKGROUND: In 2014, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) changed the recommended threshold for initiating statins from a 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) of 20% to 10% (Clinical Guideline 181), making 4.5 million extra people eligible for treatment. AIM: To evalu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pate, Alexander, Emsley, Richard, van Staa, Tjeerd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7537995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33020170
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X713057
_version_ 1783590778068533248
author Pate, Alexander
Emsley, Richard
van Staa, Tjeerd
author_facet Pate, Alexander
Emsley, Richard
van Staa, Tjeerd
author_sort Pate, Alexander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2014, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) changed the recommended threshold for initiating statins from a 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) of 20% to 10% (Clinical Guideline 181), making 4.5 million extra people eligible for treatment. AIM: To evaluate the impact of this guideline change on statin prescribing behaviour. DESIGN AND SETTING: A descriptive study using data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), a primary care database in England. METHOD: People aged 25–84 years being initiated on statins for the primary prevention of CVD were identified. CVD risk predictions were calculated for every person using data in their medical record (calculated risks), and were extracted directly from their medical record if a QRISK score was recorded (coded risks). The 10-year CVD risks of people initiated on statins in each calendar year were compared. RESULTS: The average ‘calculated risk’ of all people being initiated on statins was 20.65% in the year before the guideline change, and 20.27% after. When considering only the ‘coded risks’, the average risk was 21.85% before the guideline change, and 18.65% after. The proportion of people initiating statins that had a coded risk score in their medical record increased significantly from 2010–2017. CONCLUSION: Currently available evidence, which only considers people with coded risk scores in their medical record, indicates the guideline change had a large impact on statin prescribing. However, that analysis likely suffers from selection bias. This new evidence indicates only a modest impact of the guideline change. Further qualitative research about the lack of response to the guideline change is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7537995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75379952020-10-19 Impact of lowering the risk threshold for statin treatment on statin prescribing: a descriptive study in English primary care Pate, Alexander Emsley, Richard van Staa, Tjeerd Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: In 2014, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) changed the recommended threshold for initiating statins from a 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) of 20% to 10% (Clinical Guideline 181), making 4.5 million extra people eligible for treatment. AIM: To evaluate the impact of this guideline change on statin prescribing behaviour. DESIGN AND SETTING: A descriptive study using data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), a primary care database in England. METHOD: People aged 25–84 years being initiated on statins for the primary prevention of CVD were identified. CVD risk predictions were calculated for every person using data in their medical record (calculated risks), and were extracted directly from their medical record if a QRISK score was recorded (coded risks). The 10-year CVD risks of people initiated on statins in each calendar year were compared. RESULTS: The average ‘calculated risk’ of all people being initiated on statins was 20.65% in the year before the guideline change, and 20.27% after. When considering only the ‘coded risks’, the average risk was 21.85% before the guideline change, and 18.65% after. The proportion of people initiating statins that had a coded risk score in their medical record increased significantly from 2010–2017. CONCLUSION: Currently available evidence, which only considers people with coded risk scores in their medical record, indicates the guideline change had a large impact on statin prescribing. However, that analysis likely suffers from selection bias. This new evidence indicates only a modest impact of the guideline change. Further qualitative research about the lack of response to the guideline change is needed. Royal College of General Practitioners 2020-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7537995/ /pubmed/33020170 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X713057 Text en ©The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research
Pate, Alexander
Emsley, Richard
van Staa, Tjeerd
Impact of lowering the risk threshold for statin treatment on statin prescribing: a descriptive study in English primary care
title Impact of lowering the risk threshold for statin treatment on statin prescribing: a descriptive study in English primary care
title_full Impact of lowering the risk threshold for statin treatment on statin prescribing: a descriptive study in English primary care
title_fullStr Impact of lowering the risk threshold for statin treatment on statin prescribing: a descriptive study in English primary care
title_full_unstemmed Impact of lowering the risk threshold for statin treatment on statin prescribing: a descriptive study in English primary care
title_short Impact of lowering the risk threshold for statin treatment on statin prescribing: a descriptive study in English primary care
title_sort impact of lowering the risk threshold for statin treatment on statin prescribing: a descriptive study in english primary care
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7537995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33020170
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X713057
work_keys_str_mv AT patealexander impactofloweringtheriskthresholdforstatintreatmentonstatinprescribingadescriptivestudyinenglishprimarycare
AT emsleyrichard impactofloweringtheriskthresholdforstatintreatmentonstatinprescribingadescriptivestudyinenglishprimarycare
AT vanstaatjeerd impactofloweringtheriskthresholdforstatintreatmentonstatinprescribingadescriptivestudyinenglishprimarycare