Cargando…
Analyzing 2,589 child neurology telehealth encounters necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic
OBJECTIVE: To assess the rapid implementation of child neurology telehealth outpatient care with the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in March 2020. METHODS: This was a cohort study with retrospective comparison of 14,780 in-person encounters and 2,589 telehealth encounters,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7538222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32518152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000010010 |
_version_ | 1783590823559954432 |
---|---|
author | Rametta, Salvatore C. Fridinger, Sara E. Gonzalez, Alexander K. Xian, Julie Galer, Peter D. Kaufman, Michael Prelack, Marisa S. Sharif, Uzma Fitzgerald, Mark P. Melamed, Susan E. Malcolm, Marissa P. Kessler, Sudha Kilaru Stephenson, Donna J. Banwell, Brenda L. Abend, Nicholas S. Helbig, Ingo |
author_facet | Rametta, Salvatore C. Fridinger, Sara E. Gonzalez, Alexander K. Xian, Julie Galer, Peter D. Kaufman, Michael Prelack, Marisa S. Sharif, Uzma Fitzgerald, Mark P. Melamed, Susan E. Malcolm, Marissa P. Kessler, Sudha Kilaru Stephenson, Donna J. Banwell, Brenda L. Abend, Nicholas S. Helbig, Ingo |
author_sort | Rametta, Salvatore C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the rapid implementation of child neurology telehealth outpatient care with the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in March 2020. METHODS: This was a cohort study with retrospective comparison of 14,780 in-person encounters and 2,589 telehealth encounters, including 2,093 audio-video telemedicine and 496 scheduled telephone encounters, between October 1, 2019 and April 24, 2020. We compared in-person and telehealth encounters for patient demographics and diagnoses. For audio-video telemedicine encounters, we analyzed questionnaire responses addressing provider experience, follow-up plans, technical quality, need for in-person assessment, and parent/caregiver satisfaction. We performed manual reviews of encounters flagged as concerning by providers. RESULTS: There were no differences in patient age and major ICD-10 codes before and after transition. Clinicians considered telemedicine satisfactory in 93% (1,200 of 1,286) of encounters and suggested telemedicine as a component for follow-up care in 89% (1,144 of 1,286) of encounters. Technical challenges were reported in 40% (519 of 1,314) of encounters. In-person assessment was considered warranted after 5% (65 of 1,285) of encounters. Patients/caregivers indicated interest in telemedicine for future care in 86% (187 of 217) of encounters. Participation in telemedicine encounters compared to telephone encounters was less frequent among patients in racial or ethnic minority groups. CONCLUSIONS: We effectively converted most of our outpatient care to telehealth encounters, including mostly audio-video telemedicine encounters. Providers rated the vast majority of telemedicine encounters to be satisfactory, and only a small proportion of encounters required short-term in-person follow-up. These findings suggest that telemedicine is feasible and effective for a large proportion of child neurology care. Additional strategies are needed to ensure equitable telemedicine use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7538222 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75382222020-10-14 Analyzing 2,589 child neurology telehealth encounters necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic Rametta, Salvatore C. Fridinger, Sara E. Gonzalez, Alexander K. Xian, Julie Galer, Peter D. Kaufman, Michael Prelack, Marisa S. Sharif, Uzma Fitzgerald, Mark P. Melamed, Susan E. Malcolm, Marissa P. Kessler, Sudha Kilaru Stephenson, Donna J. Banwell, Brenda L. Abend, Nicholas S. Helbig, Ingo Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the rapid implementation of child neurology telehealth outpatient care with the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in March 2020. METHODS: This was a cohort study with retrospective comparison of 14,780 in-person encounters and 2,589 telehealth encounters, including 2,093 audio-video telemedicine and 496 scheduled telephone encounters, between October 1, 2019 and April 24, 2020. We compared in-person and telehealth encounters for patient demographics and diagnoses. For audio-video telemedicine encounters, we analyzed questionnaire responses addressing provider experience, follow-up plans, technical quality, need for in-person assessment, and parent/caregiver satisfaction. We performed manual reviews of encounters flagged as concerning by providers. RESULTS: There were no differences in patient age and major ICD-10 codes before and after transition. Clinicians considered telemedicine satisfactory in 93% (1,200 of 1,286) of encounters and suggested telemedicine as a component for follow-up care in 89% (1,144 of 1,286) of encounters. Technical challenges were reported in 40% (519 of 1,314) of encounters. In-person assessment was considered warranted after 5% (65 of 1,285) of encounters. Patients/caregivers indicated interest in telemedicine for future care in 86% (187 of 217) of encounters. Participation in telemedicine encounters compared to telephone encounters was less frequent among patients in racial or ethnic minority groups. CONCLUSIONS: We effectively converted most of our outpatient care to telehealth encounters, including mostly audio-video telemedicine encounters. Providers rated the vast majority of telemedicine encounters to be satisfactory, and only a small proportion of encounters required short-term in-person follow-up. These findings suggest that telemedicine is feasible and effective for a large proportion of child neurology care. Additional strategies are needed to ensure equitable telemedicine use. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7538222/ /pubmed/32518152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000010010 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Article Rametta, Salvatore C. Fridinger, Sara E. Gonzalez, Alexander K. Xian, Julie Galer, Peter D. Kaufman, Michael Prelack, Marisa S. Sharif, Uzma Fitzgerald, Mark P. Melamed, Susan E. Malcolm, Marissa P. Kessler, Sudha Kilaru Stephenson, Donna J. Banwell, Brenda L. Abend, Nicholas S. Helbig, Ingo Analyzing 2,589 child neurology telehealth encounters necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic |
title | Analyzing 2,589 child neurology telehealth encounters necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full | Analyzing 2,589 child neurology telehealth encounters necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_fullStr | Analyzing 2,589 child neurology telehealth encounters necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Analyzing 2,589 child neurology telehealth encounters necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_short | Analyzing 2,589 child neurology telehealth encounters necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_sort | analyzing 2,589 child neurology telehealth encounters necessitated by the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7538222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32518152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000010010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramettasalvatorec analyzing2589childneurologytelehealthencountersnecessitatedbythecovid19pandemic AT fridingersarae analyzing2589childneurologytelehealthencountersnecessitatedbythecovid19pandemic AT gonzalezalexanderk analyzing2589childneurologytelehealthencountersnecessitatedbythecovid19pandemic AT xianjulie analyzing2589childneurologytelehealthencountersnecessitatedbythecovid19pandemic AT galerpeterd analyzing2589childneurologytelehealthencountersnecessitatedbythecovid19pandemic AT kaufmanmichael analyzing2589childneurologytelehealthencountersnecessitatedbythecovid19pandemic AT prelackmarisas analyzing2589childneurologytelehealthencountersnecessitatedbythecovid19pandemic AT sharifuzma analyzing2589childneurologytelehealthencountersnecessitatedbythecovid19pandemic AT fitzgeraldmarkp analyzing2589childneurologytelehealthencountersnecessitatedbythecovid19pandemic AT melamedsusane analyzing2589childneurologytelehealthencountersnecessitatedbythecovid19pandemic AT malcolmmarissap analyzing2589childneurologytelehealthencountersnecessitatedbythecovid19pandemic AT kesslersudhakilaru analyzing2589childneurologytelehealthencountersnecessitatedbythecovid19pandemic AT stephensondonnaj analyzing2589childneurologytelehealthencountersnecessitatedbythecovid19pandemic AT banwellbrendal analyzing2589childneurologytelehealthencountersnecessitatedbythecovid19pandemic AT abendnicholass analyzing2589childneurologytelehealthencountersnecessitatedbythecovid19pandemic AT helbigingo analyzing2589childneurologytelehealthencountersnecessitatedbythecovid19pandemic |