Cargando…

Improved blind tracheal intubation in rats: a simple and secure approach

Successful tracheal intubation is the prerequisite for open-chest models. Tracheal intubation in small animal such as the rat is often challenging due to the small size and special anatomy. We investigated whether endotracheal intubation can be performed safely and reliably in rats employing only ge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ZHENG, Jing, XIAO, Zixi, ZHANG, Ke, QIU, Xue, LUO, Liying, LI, Lang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7538325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32741885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.20-0267
_version_ 1783590845598924800
author ZHENG, Jing
XIAO, Zixi
ZHANG, Ke
QIU, Xue
LUO, Liying
LI, Lang
author_facet ZHENG, Jing
XIAO, Zixi
ZHANG, Ke
QIU, Xue
LUO, Liying
LI, Lang
author_sort ZHENG, Jing
collection PubMed
description Successful tracheal intubation is the prerequisite for open-chest models. Tracheal intubation in small animal such as the rat is often challenging due to the small size and special anatomy. We investigated whether endotracheal intubation can be performed safely and reliably in rats employing only gesture fixation and a catheter. Rats were randomly classified into three groups: Improved blind intubation (B group) was performed with gestures fixed intubation position. Transillumination intubation (T group) utilized light to locate the larynx. Incision intubation (I group) was intubated after trachea incision. The feasibility, difficulty, complications of the three groups were compared. B group was faster than the other two groups. Completion time of the operation was recorded as follows: B group: 35.00 ± 9.86 sec; T group: 57.12 ± 6.54 sec; I group: 184.33 ± 25.49 sec (P≤0.001). B group has fewer attempts than Group T (P=0.001). The operational success rates of all three groups (B group 14 (93.3%) vs. T group 12 (80.0%) vs. I group 13 (86.7%)) were similar (P>0.05). In terms of operation difficult and operational complications, the differences between the three groups were not significant. The rate of endometrial damage under microscope were no difference, too. The Improved blind endotracheal intubation is a simple method, with a comparable safety profile to that of the transillumination and incision intubaton.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7538325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75383252020-10-13 Improved blind tracheal intubation in rats: a simple and secure approach ZHENG, Jing XIAO, Zixi ZHANG, Ke QIU, Xue LUO, Liying LI, Lang J Vet Med Sci Laboratory Animal Science Successful tracheal intubation is the prerequisite for open-chest models. Tracheal intubation in small animal such as the rat is often challenging due to the small size and special anatomy. We investigated whether endotracheal intubation can be performed safely and reliably in rats employing only gesture fixation and a catheter. Rats were randomly classified into three groups: Improved blind intubation (B group) was performed with gestures fixed intubation position. Transillumination intubation (T group) utilized light to locate the larynx. Incision intubation (I group) was intubated after trachea incision. The feasibility, difficulty, complications of the three groups were compared. B group was faster than the other two groups. Completion time of the operation was recorded as follows: B group: 35.00 ± 9.86 sec; T group: 57.12 ± 6.54 sec; I group: 184.33 ± 25.49 sec (P≤0.001). B group has fewer attempts than Group T (P=0.001). The operational success rates of all three groups (B group 14 (93.3%) vs. T group 12 (80.0%) vs. I group 13 (86.7%)) were similar (P>0.05). In terms of operation difficult and operational complications, the differences between the three groups were not significant. The rate of endometrial damage under microscope were no difference, too. The Improved blind endotracheal intubation is a simple method, with a comparable safety profile to that of the transillumination and incision intubaton. The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science 2020-08-03 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7538325/ /pubmed/32741885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.20-0267 Text en ©2020 The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Laboratory Animal Science
ZHENG, Jing
XIAO, Zixi
ZHANG, Ke
QIU, Xue
LUO, Liying
LI, Lang
Improved blind tracheal intubation in rats: a simple and secure approach
title Improved blind tracheal intubation in rats: a simple and secure approach
title_full Improved blind tracheal intubation in rats: a simple and secure approach
title_fullStr Improved blind tracheal intubation in rats: a simple and secure approach
title_full_unstemmed Improved blind tracheal intubation in rats: a simple and secure approach
title_short Improved blind tracheal intubation in rats: a simple and secure approach
title_sort improved blind tracheal intubation in rats: a simple and secure approach
topic Laboratory Animal Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7538325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32741885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.20-0267
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengjing improvedblindtrachealintubationinratsasimpleandsecureapproach
AT xiaozixi improvedblindtrachealintubationinratsasimpleandsecureapproach
AT zhangke improvedblindtrachealintubationinratsasimpleandsecureapproach
AT qiuxue improvedblindtrachealintubationinratsasimpleandsecureapproach
AT luoliying improvedblindtrachealintubationinratsasimpleandsecureapproach
AT lilang improvedblindtrachealintubationinratsasimpleandsecureapproach