Cargando…
Improved blind tracheal intubation in rats: a simple and secure approach
Successful tracheal intubation is the prerequisite for open-chest models. Tracheal intubation in small animal such as the rat is often challenging due to the small size and special anatomy. We investigated whether endotracheal intubation can be performed safely and reliably in rats employing only ge...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7538325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32741885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.20-0267 |
_version_ | 1783590845598924800 |
---|---|
author | ZHENG, Jing XIAO, Zixi ZHANG, Ke QIU, Xue LUO, Liying LI, Lang |
author_facet | ZHENG, Jing XIAO, Zixi ZHANG, Ke QIU, Xue LUO, Liying LI, Lang |
author_sort | ZHENG, Jing |
collection | PubMed |
description | Successful tracheal intubation is the prerequisite for open-chest models. Tracheal intubation in small animal such as the rat is often challenging due to the small size and special anatomy. We investigated whether endotracheal intubation can be performed safely and reliably in rats employing only gesture fixation and a catheter. Rats were randomly classified into three groups: Improved blind intubation (B group) was performed with gestures fixed intubation position. Transillumination intubation (T group) utilized light to locate the larynx. Incision intubation (I group) was intubated after trachea incision. The feasibility, difficulty, complications of the three groups were compared. B group was faster than the other two groups. Completion time of the operation was recorded as follows: B group: 35.00 ± 9.86 sec; T group: 57.12 ± 6.54 sec; I group: 184.33 ± 25.49 sec (P≤0.001). B group has fewer attempts than Group T (P=0.001). The operational success rates of all three groups (B group 14 (93.3%) vs. T group 12 (80.0%) vs. I group 13 (86.7%)) were similar (P>0.05). In terms of operation difficult and operational complications, the differences between the three groups were not significant. The rate of endometrial damage under microscope were no difference, too. The Improved blind endotracheal intubation is a simple method, with a comparable safety profile to that of the transillumination and incision intubaton. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7538325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75383252020-10-13 Improved blind tracheal intubation in rats: a simple and secure approach ZHENG, Jing XIAO, Zixi ZHANG, Ke QIU, Xue LUO, Liying LI, Lang J Vet Med Sci Laboratory Animal Science Successful tracheal intubation is the prerequisite for open-chest models. Tracheal intubation in small animal such as the rat is often challenging due to the small size and special anatomy. We investigated whether endotracheal intubation can be performed safely and reliably in rats employing only gesture fixation and a catheter. Rats were randomly classified into three groups: Improved blind intubation (B group) was performed with gestures fixed intubation position. Transillumination intubation (T group) utilized light to locate the larynx. Incision intubation (I group) was intubated after trachea incision. The feasibility, difficulty, complications of the three groups were compared. B group was faster than the other two groups. Completion time of the operation was recorded as follows: B group: 35.00 ± 9.86 sec; T group: 57.12 ± 6.54 sec; I group: 184.33 ± 25.49 sec (P≤0.001). B group has fewer attempts than Group T (P=0.001). The operational success rates of all three groups (B group 14 (93.3%) vs. T group 12 (80.0%) vs. I group 13 (86.7%)) were similar (P>0.05). In terms of operation difficult and operational complications, the differences between the three groups were not significant. The rate of endometrial damage under microscope were no difference, too. The Improved blind endotracheal intubation is a simple method, with a comparable safety profile to that of the transillumination and incision intubaton. The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science 2020-08-03 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7538325/ /pubmed/32741885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.20-0267 Text en ©2020 The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Laboratory Animal Science ZHENG, Jing XIAO, Zixi ZHANG, Ke QIU, Xue LUO, Liying LI, Lang Improved blind tracheal intubation in rats: a simple and secure approach |
title | Improved blind tracheal intubation in rats: a simple and secure approach |
title_full | Improved blind tracheal intubation in rats: a simple and secure approach |
title_fullStr | Improved blind tracheal intubation in rats: a simple and secure approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Improved blind tracheal intubation in rats: a simple and secure approach |
title_short | Improved blind tracheal intubation in rats: a simple and secure approach |
title_sort | improved blind tracheal intubation in rats: a simple and secure approach |
topic | Laboratory Animal Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7538325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32741885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.20-0267 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhengjing improvedblindtrachealintubationinratsasimpleandsecureapproach AT xiaozixi improvedblindtrachealintubationinratsasimpleandsecureapproach AT zhangke improvedblindtrachealintubationinratsasimpleandsecureapproach AT qiuxue improvedblindtrachealintubationinratsasimpleandsecureapproach AT luoliying improvedblindtrachealintubationinratsasimpleandsecureapproach AT lilang improvedblindtrachealintubationinratsasimpleandsecureapproach |