Cargando…
A systematic revision of Capparaceae and Cleomaceae in Egypt: an evaluation of the generic delimitations of Capparis and Cleome using ecological and genetic diversity
BACKGROUND: The Capparaceae family is commonly recognized as a caper, while Cleomaceae represents one of small flowering family within the order Brassicales. Earlier, Cleomaceae was included in the family Capparaceae; then, it was moved to a distinct family after DNA evidence. Variation in habits an...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7538494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33025275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43141-020-00069-z |
_version_ | 1783590879686033408 |
---|---|
author | El zayat, Mohamed Abd. S. Ali, Mahmoud El Sayd Amar, Mohamed Hamdy |
author_facet | El zayat, Mohamed Abd. S. Ali, Mahmoud El Sayd Amar, Mohamed Hamdy |
author_sort | El zayat, Mohamed Abd. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Capparaceae family is commonly recognized as a caper, while Cleomaceae represents one of small flowering family within the order Brassicales. Earlier, Cleomaceae was included in the family Capparaceae; then, it was moved to a distinct family after DNA evidence. Variation in habits and a bewildering array of floral and fruit forms contributed to making Capparaceae a “trash-basket” family in which many unrelated plants were placed. Indeed, family Capparaceae and Cleomaceae are in clear need of more detailed systematic revision. RESULTS: Here, in the present study, the morphological characteristics and the ecological distribution as well as the genetic diversity analysis among the twelve species of both Capparaceae and Cleomaceae have been determined. The genetic analysis has been checked using 15 ISSR, 30 SRAP, and 18 ISTR to assess the systematic knots between the two families. In order to detect the molecular phylogeny, a comparative analysis of the three markers was performed based on the exposure of discriminating capacity, efficiency, and phylogenetic heatmap. Our results indicated that there is a morphological and ecological variation between the two families. Moreover, the molecular analysis confirmed that ISTR followed by SRAP markers has superior discriminating capacity for describing the genetic diversity and is able to simultaneously distinguish many polymorphic markers per reaction. Indeed, both the PCA and HCA data have drawn a successful annotation relationship in Capparaceae and Cleome species to evaluate whether the specific group sort individual or overlap groups. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of the morphological and ecological characterization along with the genetic diversity indicated an insight solution thorny interspecies in Cleome and Gynandropsis genera as a distinct family (Cleomaceae) and the other genera (Capparis, Cadaba, Boscia, and Maerua) as Capparaceae. Finally, we recommended further studies to elucidate the systematic position of Dipterygium glaucum. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7538494 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75384942020-10-19 A systematic revision of Capparaceae and Cleomaceae in Egypt: an evaluation of the generic delimitations of Capparis and Cleome using ecological and genetic diversity El zayat, Mohamed Abd. S. Ali, Mahmoud El Sayd Amar, Mohamed Hamdy J Genet Eng Biotechnol Research BACKGROUND: The Capparaceae family is commonly recognized as a caper, while Cleomaceae represents one of small flowering family within the order Brassicales. Earlier, Cleomaceae was included in the family Capparaceae; then, it was moved to a distinct family after DNA evidence. Variation in habits and a bewildering array of floral and fruit forms contributed to making Capparaceae a “trash-basket” family in which many unrelated plants were placed. Indeed, family Capparaceae and Cleomaceae are in clear need of more detailed systematic revision. RESULTS: Here, in the present study, the morphological characteristics and the ecological distribution as well as the genetic diversity analysis among the twelve species of both Capparaceae and Cleomaceae have been determined. The genetic analysis has been checked using 15 ISSR, 30 SRAP, and 18 ISTR to assess the systematic knots between the two families. In order to detect the molecular phylogeny, a comparative analysis of the three markers was performed based on the exposure of discriminating capacity, efficiency, and phylogenetic heatmap. Our results indicated that there is a morphological and ecological variation between the two families. Moreover, the molecular analysis confirmed that ISTR followed by SRAP markers has superior discriminating capacity for describing the genetic diversity and is able to simultaneously distinguish many polymorphic markers per reaction. Indeed, both the PCA and HCA data have drawn a successful annotation relationship in Capparaceae and Cleome species to evaluate whether the specific group sort individual or overlap groups. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of the morphological and ecological characterization along with the genetic diversity indicated an insight solution thorny interspecies in Cleome and Gynandropsis genera as a distinct family (Cleomaceae) and the other genera (Capparis, Cadaba, Boscia, and Maerua) as Capparaceae. Finally, we recommended further studies to elucidate the systematic position of Dipterygium glaucum. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7538494/ /pubmed/33025275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43141-020-00069-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research El zayat, Mohamed Abd. S. Ali, Mahmoud El Sayd Amar, Mohamed Hamdy A systematic revision of Capparaceae and Cleomaceae in Egypt: an evaluation of the generic delimitations of Capparis and Cleome using ecological and genetic diversity |
title | A systematic revision of Capparaceae and Cleomaceae in Egypt: an evaluation of the generic delimitations of Capparis and Cleome using ecological and genetic diversity |
title_full | A systematic revision of Capparaceae and Cleomaceae in Egypt: an evaluation of the generic delimitations of Capparis and Cleome using ecological and genetic diversity |
title_fullStr | A systematic revision of Capparaceae and Cleomaceae in Egypt: an evaluation of the generic delimitations of Capparis and Cleome using ecological and genetic diversity |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic revision of Capparaceae and Cleomaceae in Egypt: an evaluation of the generic delimitations of Capparis and Cleome using ecological and genetic diversity |
title_short | A systematic revision of Capparaceae and Cleomaceae in Egypt: an evaluation of the generic delimitations of Capparis and Cleome using ecological and genetic diversity |
title_sort | systematic revision of capparaceae and cleomaceae in egypt: an evaluation of the generic delimitations of capparis and cleome using ecological and genetic diversity |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7538494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33025275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43141-020-00069-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elzayatmohamedabds asystematicrevisionofcapparaceaeandcleomaceaeinegyptanevaluationofthegenericdelimitationsofcapparisandcleomeusingecologicalandgeneticdiversity AT alimahmoudelsayd asystematicrevisionofcapparaceaeandcleomaceaeinegyptanevaluationofthegenericdelimitationsofcapparisandcleomeusingecologicalandgeneticdiversity AT amarmohamedhamdy asystematicrevisionofcapparaceaeandcleomaceaeinegyptanevaluationofthegenericdelimitationsofcapparisandcleomeusingecologicalandgeneticdiversity AT elzayatmohamedabds systematicrevisionofcapparaceaeandcleomaceaeinegyptanevaluationofthegenericdelimitationsofcapparisandcleomeusingecologicalandgeneticdiversity AT alimahmoudelsayd systematicrevisionofcapparaceaeandcleomaceaeinegyptanevaluationofthegenericdelimitationsofcapparisandcleomeusingecologicalandgeneticdiversity AT amarmohamedhamdy systematicrevisionofcapparaceaeandcleomaceaeinegyptanevaluationofthegenericdelimitationsofcapparisandcleomeusingecologicalandgeneticdiversity |