Cargando…
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs. Conventional Recovery After Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy
Background and objective: Radical cystectomy has been characterized as the most difficult operation in urology because of the complex surgical procedures and postoperative complications. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), which reduces the incidence of perioperative complications, has been wide...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7538712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072572 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.541390 |
_version_ | 1783590923227103232 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Dongxu Sun, Kai Wang, Tianqi Wu, Gang Wang, Jipeng Cui, Yuanshan Wu, Jitao |
author_facet | Zhang, Dongxu Sun, Kai Wang, Tianqi Wu, Gang Wang, Jipeng Cui, Yuanshan Wu, Jitao |
author_sort | Zhang, Dongxu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and objective: Radical cystectomy has been characterized as the most difficult operation in urology because of the complex surgical procedures and postoperative complications. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), which reduces the incidence of perioperative complications, has been widely used in clinical surgery. Herein, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ERAS vs. conventional recovery after surgery (CRAS) on perioperative outcomes of radical cystectomy. Methods: We performed a systematic search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the following databases: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, based on the PICOS strategy. The reference lists of the retrieved studies were further surveyed for relevant publications. Results: Our search yielded seven RCTs containing 813 patients. The ERAS group was found to have better performance in the following parameters: length of hospital stay [mean difference (MD) = −1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): −1.80 to −0.45, P = 0.001], time to first flatus (MD = −0.70, 95% CI: −0.98 to 0.41, P < 0.00001), and time to regular diet (MD = −0.12, 95% CI: −1.76 to −0.28, P = 0.007). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in major complications [odds ratio (OR) = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.63 to 1.34, P = 0.64], readmission (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.65 to 2.01, P = 0.63), ileus (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.28, P = 0.29), wound infection (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.31 to 1.01, P = 0.05), mortality (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.99, P = 0.49), or time to first bowel movement (MD = −0.55, 95% CI: −1.62 to 0.53, P = 0.32). Conclusion: ERAS reduced the length of hospital stay, time to first flatus, and time to regular diet after cystectomy. Compared to CRAS protocols, ERAS protocols do not increase the risk of adverse events. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7538712 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75387122020-10-15 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs. Conventional Recovery After Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy Zhang, Dongxu Sun, Kai Wang, Tianqi Wu, Gang Wang, Jipeng Cui, Yuanshan Wu, Jitao Front Oncol Oncology Background and objective: Radical cystectomy has been characterized as the most difficult operation in urology because of the complex surgical procedures and postoperative complications. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), which reduces the incidence of perioperative complications, has been widely used in clinical surgery. Herein, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ERAS vs. conventional recovery after surgery (CRAS) on perioperative outcomes of radical cystectomy. Methods: We performed a systematic search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the following databases: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, based on the PICOS strategy. The reference lists of the retrieved studies were further surveyed for relevant publications. Results: Our search yielded seven RCTs containing 813 patients. The ERAS group was found to have better performance in the following parameters: length of hospital stay [mean difference (MD) = −1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): −1.80 to −0.45, P = 0.001], time to first flatus (MD = −0.70, 95% CI: −0.98 to 0.41, P < 0.00001), and time to regular diet (MD = −0.12, 95% CI: −1.76 to −0.28, P = 0.007). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in major complications [odds ratio (OR) = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.63 to 1.34, P = 0.64], readmission (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.65 to 2.01, P = 0.63), ileus (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.28, P = 0.29), wound infection (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.31 to 1.01, P = 0.05), mortality (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.99, P = 0.49), or time to first bowel movement (MD = −0.55, 95% CI: −1.62 to 0.53, P = 0.32). Conclusion: ERAS reduced the length of hospital stay, time to first flatus, and time to regular diet after cystectomy. Compared to CRAS protocols, ERAS protocols do not increase the risk of adverse events. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7538712/ /pubmed/33072572 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.541390 Text en Copyright © 2020 Zhang, Sun, Wang, Wu, Wang, Cui and Wu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Zhang, Dongxu Sun, Kai Wang, Tianqi Wu, Gang Wang, Jipeng Cui, Yuanshan Wu, Jitao Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs. Conventional Recovery After Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy |
title | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs. Conventional Recovery After Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy |
title_full | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs. Conventional Recovery After Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy |
title_fullStr | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs. Conventional Recovery After Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs. Conventional Recovery After Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy |
title_short | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs. Conventional Recovery After Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery vs. conventional recovery after surgery on perioperative outcomes of radical cystectomy |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7538712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072572 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.541390 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangdongxu systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryvsconventionalrecoveryaftersurgeryonperioperativeoutcomesofradicalcystectomy AT sunkai systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryvsconventionalrecoveryaftersurgeryonperioperativeoutcomesofradicalcystectomy AT wangtianqi systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryvsconventionalrecoveryaftersurgeryonperioperativeoutcomesofradicalcystectomy AT wugang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryvsconventionalrecoveryaftersurgeryonperioperativeoutcomesofradicalcystectomy AT wangjipeng systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryvsconventionalrecoveryaftersurgeryonperioperativeoutcomesofradicalcystectomy AT cuiyuanshan systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryvsconventionalrecoveryaftersurgeryonperioperativeoutcomesofradicalcystectomy AT wujitao systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryvsconventionalrecoveryaftersurgeryonperioperativeoutcomesofradicalcystectomy |