Cargando…

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs. Conventional Recovery After Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy

Background and objective: Radical cystectomy has been characterized as the most difficult operation in urology because of the complex surgical procedures and postoperative complications. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), which reduces the incidence of perioperative complications, has been wide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Dongxu, Sun, Kai, Wang, Tianqi, Wu, Gang, Wang, Jipeng, Cui, Yuanshan, Wu, Jitao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7538712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072572
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.541390
_version_ 1783590923227103232
author Zhang, Dongxu
Sun, Kai
Wang, Tianqi
Wu, Gang
Wang, Jipeng
Cui, Yuanshan
Wu, Jitao
author_facet Zhang, Dongxu
Sun, Kai
Wang, Tianqi
Wu, Gang
Wang, Jipeng
Cui, Yuanshan
Wu, Jitao
author_sort Zhang, Dongxu
collection PubMed
description Background and objective: Radical cystectomy has been characterized as the most difficult operation in urology because of the complex surgical procedures and postoperative complications. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), which reduces the incidence of perioperative complications, has been widely used in clinical surgery. Herein, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ERAS vs. conventional recovery after surgery (CRAS) on perioperative outcomes of radical cystectomy. Methods: We performed a systematic search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the following databases: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, based on the PICOS strategy. The reference lists of the retrieved studies were further surveyed for relevant publications. Results: Our search yielded seven RCTs containing 813 patients. The ERAS group was found to have better performance in the following parameters: length of hospital stay [mean difference (MD) = −1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): −1.80 to −0.45, P = 0.001], time to first flatus (MD = −0.70, 95% CI: −0.98 to 0.41, P < 0.00001), and time to regular diet (MD = −0.12, 95% CI: −1.76 to −0.28, P = 0.007). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in major complications [odds ratio (OR) = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.63 to 1.34, P = 0.64], readmission (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.65 to 2.01, P = 0.63), ileus (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.28, P = 0.29), wound infection (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.31 to 1.01, P = 0.05), mortality (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.99, P = 0.49), or time to first bowel movement (MD = −0.55, 95% CI: −1.62 to 0.53, P = 0.32). Conclusion: ERAS reduced the length of hospital stay, time to first flatus, and time to regular diet after cystectomy. Compared to CRAS protocols, ERAS protocols do not increase the risk of adverse events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7538712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75387122020-10-15 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs. Conventional Recovery After Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy Zhang, Dongxu Sun, Kai Wang, Tianqi Wu, Gang Wang, Jipeng Cui, Yuanshan Wu, Jitao Front Oncol Oncology Background and objective: Radical cystectomy has been characterized as the most difficult operation in urology because of the complex surgical procedures and postoperative complications. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), which reduces the incidence of perioperative complications, has been widely used in clinical surgery. Herein, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ERAS vs. conventional recovery after surgery (CRAS) on perioperative outcomes of radical cystectomy. Methods: We performed a systematic search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the following databases: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, based on the PICOS strategy. The reference lists of the retrieved studies were further surveyed for relevant publications. Results: Our search yielded seven RCTs containing 813 patients. The ERAS group was found to have better performance in the following parameters: length of hospital stay [mean difference (MD) = −1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): −1.80 to −0.45, P = 0.001], time to first flatus (MD = −0.70, 95% CI: −0.98 to 0.41, P < 0.00001), and time to regular diet (MD = −0.12, 95% CI: −1.76 to −0.28, P = 0.007). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in major complications [odds ratio (OR) = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.63 to 1.34, P = 0.64], readmission (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.65 to 2.01, P = 0.63), ileus (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.28, P = 0.29), wound infection (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.31 to 1.01, P = 0.05), mortality (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.99, P = 0.49), or time to first bowel movement (MD = −0.55, 95% CI: −1.62 to 0.53, P = 0.32). Conclusion: ERAS reduced the length of hospital stay, time to first flatus, and time to regular diet after cystectomy. Compared to CRAS protocols, ERAS protocols do not increase the risk of adverse events. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7538712/ /pubmed/33072572 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.541390 Text en Copyright © 2020 Zhang, Sun, Wang, Wu, Wang, Cui and Wu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Zhang, Dongxu
Sun, Kai
Wang, Tianqi
Wu, Gang
Wang, Jipeng
Cui, Yuanshan
Wu, Jitao
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs. Conventional Recovery After Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy
title Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs. Conventional Recovery After Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy
title_full Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs. Conventional Recovery After Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy
title_fullStr Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs. Conventional Recovery After Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs. Conventional Recovery After Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy
title_short Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs. Conventional Recovery After Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery vs. conventional recovery after surgery on perioperative outcomes of radical cystectomy
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7538712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072572
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.541390
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangdongxu systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryvsconventionalrecoveryaftersurgeryonperioperativeoutcomesofradicalcystectomy
AT sunkai systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryvsconventionalrecoveryaftersurgeryonperioperativeoutcomesofradicalcystectomy
AT wangtianqi systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryvsconventionalrecoveryaftersurgeryonperioperativeoutcomesofradicalcystectomy
AT wugang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryvsconventionalrecoveryaftersurgeryonperioperativeoutcomesofradicalcystectomy
AT wangjipeng systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryvsconventionalrecoveryaftersurgeryonperioperativeoutcomesofradicalcystectomy
AT cuiyuanshan systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryvsconventionalrecoveryaftersurgeryonperioperativeoutcomesofradicalcystectomy
AT wujitao systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryvsconventionalrecoveryaftersurgeryonperioperativeoutcomesofradicalcystectomy