Cargando…

Best-practice IgM- and IgA-enriched immunoglobulin use in patients with sepsis

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Despite treatment being in line with current guidelines, mortality remains high in those with septic shock. Intravenous immunoglobulins represent a promising therapy to modulate both the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nierhaus, Axel, Berlot, Giorgio, Kindgen-Milles, Detlef, Müller, Eckhard, Girardis, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7538847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33026597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00740-1
_version_ 1783590942274486272
author Nierhaus, Axel
Berlot, Giorgio
Kindgen-Milles, Detlef
Müller, Eckhard
Girardis, Massimo
author_facet Nierhaus, Axel
Berlot, Giorgio
Kindgen-Milles, Detlef
Müller, Eckhard
Girardis, Massimo
author_sort Nierhaus, Axel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Despite treatment being in line with current guidelines, mortality remains high in those with septic shock. Intravenous immunoglobulins represent a promising therapy to modulate both the pro- and anti-inflammatory processes and can contribute to the elimination of pathogens. In this context, there is evidence of the benefits of immunoglobulin M (IgM)- and immunoglobulin A (IgA)-enriched immunoglobulin therapy for sepsis. This manuscript aims to summarize current relevant data to provide expert opinions on best practice for the use of an IgM- and IgA-enriched immunoglobulin (Pentaglobin) in adult patients with sepsis. MAIN TEXT: Sepsis patients with hyperinflammation and patients with immunosuppression may benefit most from treatment with IgM- and IgA-enriched immunoglobulin (Pentaglobin). Patients with hyperinflammation present with phenotypes that manifest throughout the body, whilst the clinical characteristics of immunosuppression are less clear. Potential biomarkers for hyperinflammation include elevated procalcitonin, interleukin-6, endotoxin activity and C-reactive protein, although thresholds for these are not well-defined. Convenient biomarkers for identifying patients in a stage of immune-paralysis are still matter of debate, though human leukocyte antigen–antigen D related expression on monocytes, lymphocyte count and viral reactivation have been proposed. The timing of treatment is potentially more critical for treatment efficacy in patients with hyperinflammation compared with patients who are in an immunosuppressed stage. Due to the lack of evidence, definitive dosage recommendations for either population cannot be made, though we suggest that patients with hyperinflammation should receive an initial bolus at a rate of up to 0.6 mL (30 mg)/kg/h for 6 h followed by a continuous maintenance rate of 0.2 mL (10 mg)/kg/hour for ≥ 72 h (total dose ≥ 0.9 g/kg). For immunosuppressed patients, dosage is more conservative (0.2 mL [10 mg]/kg/h) for ≥ 72 h, without an initial bolus (total dose ≥ 0.72 g/kg). CONCLUSIONS: Two distinct populations that may benefit most from Pentaglobin therapy are described in this review. However, further clinical evidence is required to strengthen support for the recommendations given here regarding timing, duration and dosage of treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7538847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75388472020-10-07 Best-practice IgM- and IgA-enriched immunoglobulin use in patients with sepsis Nierhaus, Axel Berlot, Giorgio Kindgen-Milles, Detlef Müller, Eckhard Girardis, Massimo Ann Intensive Care Review BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Despite treatment being in line with current guidelines, mortality remains high in those with septic shock. Intravenous immunoglobulins represent a promising therapy to modulate both the pro- and anti-inflammatory processes and can contribute to the elimination of pathogens. In this context, there is evidence of the benefits of immunoglobulin M (IgM)- and immunoglobulin A (IgA)-enriched immunoglobulin therapy for sepsis. This manuscript aims to summarize current relevant data to provide expert opinions on best practice for the use of an IgM- and IgA-enriched immunoglobulin (Pentaglobin) in adult patients with sepsis. MAIN TEXT: Sepsis patients with hyperinflammation and patients with immunosuppression may benefit most from treatment with IgM- and IgA-enriched immunoglobulin (Pentaglobin). Patients with hyperinflammation present with phenotypes that manifest throughout the body, whilst the clinical characteristics of immunosuppression are less clear. Potential biomarkers for hyperinflammation include elevated procalcitonin, interleukin-6, endotoxin activity and C-reactive protein, although thresholds for these are not well-defined. Convenient biomarkers for identifying patients in a stage of immune-paralysis are still matter of debate, though human leukocyte antigen–antigen D related expression on monocytes, lymphocyte count and viral reactivation have been proposed. The timing of treatment is potentially more critical for treatment efficacy in patients with hyperinflammation compared with patients who are in an immunosuppressed stage. Due to the lack of evidence, definitive dosage recommendations for either population cannot be made, though we suggest that patients with hyperinflammation should receive an initial bolus at a rate of up to 0.6 mL (30 mg)/kg/h for 6 h followed by a continuous maintenance rate of 0.2 mL (10 mg)/kg/hour for ≥ 72 h (total dose ≥ 0.9 g/kg). For immunosuppressed patients, dosage is more conservative (0.2 mL [10 mg]/kg/h) for ≥ 72 h, without an initial bolus (total dose ≥ 0.72 g/kg). CONCLUSIONS: Two distinct populations that may benefit most from Pentaglobin therapy are described in this review. However, further clinical evidence is required to strengthen support for the recommendations given here regarding timing, duration and dosage of treatment. Springer International Publishing 2020-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7538847/ /pubmed/33026597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00740-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Nierhaus, Axel
Berlot, Giorgio
Kindgen-Milles, Detlef
Müller, Eckhard
Girardis, Massimo
Best-practice IgM- and IgA-enriched immunoglobulin use in patients with sepsis
title Best-practice IgM- and IgA-enriched immunoglobulin use in patients with sepsis
title_full Best-practice IgM- and IgA-enriched immunoglobulin use in patients with sepsis
title_fullStr Best-practice IgM- and IgA-enriched immunoglobulin use in patients with sepsis
title_full_unstemmed Best-practice IgM- and IgA-enriched immunoglobulin use in patients with sepsis
title_short Best-practice IgM- and IgA-enriched immunoglobulin use in patients with sepsis
title_sort best-practice igm- and iga-enriched immunoglobulin use in patients with sepsis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7538847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33026597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00740-1
work_keys_str_mv AT nierhausaxel bestpracticeigmandigaenrichedimmunoglobulinuseinpatientswithsepsis
AT berlotgiorgio bestpracticeigmandigaenrichedimmunoglobulinuseinpatientswithsepsis
AT kindgenmillesdetlef bestpracticeigmandigaenrichedimmunoglobulinuseinpatientswithsepsis
AT mullereckhard bestpracticeigmandigaenrichedimmunoglobulinuseinpatientswithsepsis
AT girardismassimo bestpracticeigmandigaenrichedimmunoglobulinuseinpatientswithsepsis