Cargando…

Reproducibility of a new classification of the anterior clinoid process of the sphenoid bone

BACKGROUND: Pneumatization of the anterior clinoid process (ACP) affects paraclinoid region surgery, this anatomical variation occurs in 6.6–27.7% of individuals, making its preoperative recognition essential given the need for correction based on the anatomy of the pneumatized process. This study w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaddad-Neto, Feres, da Costa, Marcos Devanir Silva, Santos, Bruno, Caramanti, Ricardo Lourenco, Costa, Bruno Lourenco, Doria-Netto, Hugo Leonardo, Figueiredo, Eberval Gadelha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7538961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33033643
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_133_2020
_version_ 1783590966729375744
author Chaddad-Neto, Feres
da Costa, Marcos Devanir Silva
Santos, Bruno
Caramanti, Ricardo Lourenco
Costa, Bruno Lourenco
Doria-Netto, Hugo Leonardo
Figueiredo, Eberval Gadelha
author_facet Chaddad-Neto, Feres
da Costa, Marcos Devanir Silva
Santos, Bruno
Caramanti, Ricardo Lourenco
Costa, Bruno Lourenco
Doria-Netto, Hugo Leonardo
Figueiredo, Eberval Gadelha
author_sort Chaddad-Neto, Feres
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pneumatization of the anterior clinoid process (ACP) affects paraclinoid region surgery, this anatomical variation occurs in 6.6–27.7% of individuals, making its preoperative recognition essential given the need for correction based on the anatomy of the pneumatized process. This study was conducted to evaluate the reproducibility of an optic strut-based ACP pneumatization classification by presenting radiological examinations to a group of surgeons. METHODS: Thirty cranial computer tomography (CT) scans performed from 2013 to 2014 were selected for analysis by neurosurgery residents and neurosurgeons. The evaluators received Google Forms with questionnaires on each scan, DICOM files to be manipulated in the Horos software for multiplanar reconstruction, and a collection of slides demonstrating the steps for classifying each type of ACP pneumatization. Interobserver agreement was calculated by the Fleiss kappa test. RESULTS: Thirty CT scans were analyzed by 37 evaluators, of whom 20 were neurosurgery residents and 17 were neurosurgeons. The overall reproducibility of the ACP pneumatization classification showed a Fleiss kappa index of 0.49 (95% confidence interval: 0.49–0.50). The interobserver agreement indices for the residents and neurosurgeons were 0.52 (0.51–0.53) and 0.49 (0.48–0.50), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: The optic strut-based classification of ACP pneumatization showed acceptable concordance. Minor differences were observed in the agreement between the residents and neurosurgeons. These differences could be explained by the residents’ presumably higher familiarity with multiplanar reconstruction software.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7538961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75389612020-10-07 Reproducibility of a new classification of the anterior clinoid process of the sphenoid bone Chaddad-Neto, Feres da Costa, Marcos Devanir Silva Santos, Bruno Caramanti, Ricardo Lourenco Costa, Bruno Lourenco Doria-Netto, Hugo Leonardo Figueiredo, Eberval Gadelha Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: Pneumatization of the anterior clinoid process (ACP) affects paraclinoid region surgery, this anatomical variation occurs in 6.6–27.7% of individuals, making its preoperative recognition essential given the need for correction based on the anatomy of the pneumatized process. This study was conducted to evaluate the reproducibility of an optic strut-based ACP pneumatization classification by presenting radiological examinations to a group of surgeons. METHODS: Thirty cranial computer tomography (CT) scans performed from 2013 to 2014 were selected for analysis by neurosurgery residents and neurosurgeons. The evaluators received Google Forms with questionnaires on each scan, DICOM files to be manipulated in the Horos software for multiplanar reconstruction, and a collection of slides demonstrating the steps for classifying each type of ACP pneumatization. Interobserver agreement was calculated by the Fleiss kappa test. RESULTS: Thirty CT scans were analyzed by 37 evaluators, of whom 20 were neurosurgery residents and 17 were neurosurgeons. The overall reproducibility of the ACP pneumatization classification showed a Fleiss kappa index of 0.49 (95% confidence interval: 0.49–0.50). The interobserver agreement indices for the residents and neurosurgeons were 0.52 (0.51–0.53) and 0.49 (0.48–0.50), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: The optic strut-based classification of ACP pneumatization showed acceptable concordance. Minor differences were observed in the agreement between the residents and neurosurgeons. These differences could be explained by the residents’ presumably higher familiarity with multiplanar reconstruction software. Scientific Scholar 2020-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7538961/ /pubmed/33033643 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_133_2020 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Surgical Neurology International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chaddad-Neto, Feres
da Costa, Marcos Devanir Silva
Santos, Bruno
Caramanti, Ricardo Lourenco
Costa, Bruno Lourenco
Doria-Netto, Hugo Leonardo
Figueiredo, Eberval Gadelha
Reproducibility of a new classification of the anterior clinoid process of the sphenoid bone
title Reproducibility of a new classification of the anterior clinoid process of the sphenoid bone
title_full Reproducibility of a new classification of the anterior clinoid process of the sphenoid bone
title_fullStr Reproducibility of a new classification of the anterior clinoid process of the sphenoid bone
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of a new classification of the anterior clinoid process of the sphenoid bone
title_short Reproducibility of a new classification of the anterior clinoid process of the sphenoid bone
title_sort reproducibility of a new classification of the anterior clinoid process of the sphenoid bone
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7538961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33033643
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_133_2020
work_keys_str_mv AT chaddadnetoferes reproducibilityofanewclassificationoftheanteriorclinoidprocessofthesphenoidbone
AT dacostamarcosdevanirsilva reproducibilityofanewclassificationoftheanteriorclinoidprocessofthesphenoidbone
AT santosbruno reproducibilityofanewclassificationoftheanteriorclinoidprocessofthesphenoidbone
AT caramantiricardolourenco reproducibilityofanewclassificationoftheanteriorclinoidprocessofthesphenoidbone
AT costabrunolourenco reproducibilityofanewclassificationoftheanteriorclinoidprocessofthesphenoidbone
AT dorianettohugoleonardo reproducibilityofanewclassificationoftheanteriorclinoidprocessofthesphenoidbone
AT figueiredoebervalgadelha reproducibilityofanewclassificationoftheanteriorclinoidprocessofthesphenoidbone