Cargando…
Reproducibility of a new classification of the anterior clinoid process of the sphenoid bone
BACKGROUND: Pneumatization of the anterior clinoid process (ACP) affects paraclinoid region surgery, this anatomical variation occurs in 6.6–27.7% of individuals, making its preoperative recognition essential given the need for correction based on the anatomy of the pneumatized process. This study w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Scientific Scholar
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7538961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33033643 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_133_2020 |
_version_ | 1783590966729375744 |
---|---|
author | Chaddad-Neto, Feres da Costa, Marcos Devanir Silva Santos, Bruno Caramanti, Ricardo Lourenco Costa, Bruno Lourenco Doria-Netto, Hugo Leonardo Figueiredo, Eberval Gadelha |
author_facet | Chaddad-Neto, Feres da Costa, Marcos Devanir Silva Santos, Bruno Caramanti, Ricardo Lourenco Costa, Bruno Lourenco Doria-Netto, Hugo Leonardo Figueiredo, Eberval Gadelha |
author_sort | Chaddad-Neto, Feres |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pneumatization of the anterior clinoid process (ACP) affects paraclinoid region surgery, this anatomical variation occurs in 6.6–27.7% of individuals, making its preoperative recognition essential given the need for correction based on the anatomy of the pneumatized process. This study was conducted to evaluate the reproducibility of an optic strut-based ACP pneumatization classification by presenting radiological examinations to a group of surgeons. METHODS: Thirty cranial computer tomography (CT) scans performed from 2013 to 2014 were selected for analysis by neurosurgery residents and neurosurgeons. The evaluators received Google Forms with questionnaires on each scan, DICOM files to be manipulated in the Horos software for multiplanar reconstruction, and a collection of slides demonstrating the steps for classifying each type of ACP pneumatization. Interobserver agreement was calculated by the Fleiss kappa test. RESULTS: Thirty CT scans were analyzed by 37 evaluators, of whom 20 were neurosurgery residents and 17 were neurosurgeons. The overall reproducibility of the ACP pneumatization classification showed a Fleiss kappa index of 0.49 (95% confidence interval: 0.49–0.50). The interobserver agreement indices for the residents and neurosurgeons were 0.52 (0.51–0.53) and 0.49 (0.48–0.50), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: The optic strut-based classification of ACP pneumatization showed acceptable concordance. Minor differences were observed in the agreement between the residents and neurosurgeons. These differences could be explained by the residents’ presumably higher familiarity with multiplanar reconstruction software. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7538961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Scientific Scholar |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75389612020-10-07 Reproducibility of a new classification of the anterior clinoid process of the sphenoid bone Chaddad-Neto, Feres da Costa, Marcos Devanir Silva Santos, Bruno Caramanti, Ricardo Lourenco Costa, Bruno Lourenco Doria-Netto, Hugo Leonardo Figueiredo, Eberval Gadelha Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: Pneumatization of the anterior clinoid process (ACP) affects paraclinoid region surgery, this anatomical variation occurs in 6.6–27.7% of individuals, making its preoperative recognition essential given the need for correction based on the anatomy of the pneumatized process. This study was conducted to evaluate the reproducibility of an optic strut-based ACP pneumatization classification by presenting radiological examinations to a group of surgeons. METHODS: Thirty cranial computer tomography (CT) scans performed from 2013 to 2014 were selected for analysis by neurosurgery residents and neurosurgeons. The evaluators received Google Forms with questionnaires on each scan, DICOM files to be manipulated in the Horos software for multiplanar reconstruction, and a collection of slides demonstrating the steps for classifying each type of ACP pneumatization. Interobserver agreement was calculated by the Fleiss kappa test. RESULTS: Thirty CT scans were analyzed by 37 evaluators, of whom 20 were neurosurgery residents and 17 were neurosurgeons. The overall reproducibility of the ACP pneumatization classification showed a Fleiss kappa index of 0.49 (95% confidence interval: 0.49–0.50). The interobserver agreement indices for the residents and neurosurgeons were 0.52 (0.51–0.53) and 0.49 (0.48–0.50), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: The optic strut-based classification of ACP pneumatization showed acceptable concordance. Minor differences were observed in the agreement between the residents and neurosurgeons. These differences could be explained by the residents’ presumably higher familiarity with multiplanar reconstruction software. Scientific Scholar 2020-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7538961/ /pubmed/33033643 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_133_2020 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Surgical Neurology International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chaddad-Neto, Feres da Costa, Marcos Devanir Silva Santos, Bruno Caramanti, Ricardo Lourenco Costa, Bruno Lourenco Doria-Netto, Hugo Leonardo Figueiredo, Eberval Gadelha Reproducibility of a new classification of the anterior clinoid process of the sphenoid bone |
title | Reproducibility of a new classification of the anterior clinoid process of the sphenoid bone |
title_full | Reproducibility of a new classification of the anterior clinoid process of the sphenoid bone |
title_fullStr | Reproducibility of a new classification of the anterior clinoid process of the sphenoid bone |
title_full_unstemmed | Reproducibility of a new classification of the anterior clinoid process of the sphenoid bone |
title_short | Reproducibility of a new classification of the anterior clinoid process of the sphenoid bone |
title_sort | reproducibility of a new classification of the anterior clinoid process of the sphenoid bone |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7538961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33033643 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_133_2020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaddadnetoferes reproducibilityofanewclassificationoftheanteriorclinoidprocessofthesphenoidbone AT dacostamarcosdevanirsilva reproducibilityofanewclassificationoftheanteriorclinoidprocessofthesphenoidbone AT santosbruno reproducibilityofanewclassificationoftheanteriorclinoidprocessofthesphenoidbone AT caramantiricardolourenco reproducibilityofanewclassificationoftheanteriorclinoidprocessofthesphenoidbone AT costabrunolourenco reproducibilityofanewclassificationoftheanteriorclinoidprocessofthesphenoidbone AT dorianettohugoleonardo reproducibilityofanewclassificationoftheanteriorclinoidprocessofthesphenoidbone AT figueiredoebervalgadelha reproducibilityofanewclassificationoftheanteriorclinoidprocessofthesphenoidbone |