Cargando…

Screening of 22q11.2DS Using Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification as an Alternative Diagnostic Method

BACKGROUND: The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is the most common form of deletion disorder in humans. Low copy repeats flanking the 22q11.2 region confers a substrate for nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) events leading to rearrangements which have been reported to be associated wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maran, Sathiya, Faten, Siti Aisyah, Lim, Swee-Hua Erin, Lai, Kok-Song, Ibrahim, Wan Pauzi Wan, Ankathil, Ravindran, Gan, Siew Hua, Tan, Huay Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33062692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6945730
_version_ 1783590991131836416
author Maran, Sathiya
Faten, Siti Aisyah
Lim, Swee-Hua Erin
Lai, Kok-Song
Ibrahim, Wan Pauzi Wan
Ankathil, Ravindran
Gan, Siew Hua
Tan, Huay Lin
author_facet Maran, Sathiya
Faten, Siti Aisyah
Lim, Swee-Hua Erin
Lai, Kok-Song
Ibrahim, Wan Pauzi Wan
Ankathil, Ravindran
Gan, Siew Hua
Tan, Huay Lin
author_sort Maran, Sathiya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is the most common form of deletion disorder in humans. Low copy repeats flanking the 22q11.2 region confers a substrate for nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) events leading to rearrangements which have been reported to be associated with highly variable and expansive phenotypes. The 22q11.2DS is reported as the most common genetic cause of congenital heart defects (CHDs). METHODS: A total of 42 patients with congenital heart defects, as confirmed by echocardiography, were recruited. Genetic molecular analysis using a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique was conducted as part of routine 22q11.2DS screening, followed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), which serves as a confirmatory test. RESULTS: Two of the 42 CHD cases (4.76%) indicated the presence of 22q11.2DS, and interestingly, both cases have conotruncal heart defects. In terms of concordance of techniques used, MLPA is superior since it can detect deletions within the 22q11.2 locus and outside of the typically deleted region (TDR) as well as duplications. CONCLUSION: The incidence of 22q11.2DS among patients with CHD in the east coast of Malaysia is 0.047. MLPA is a scalable and affordable alternative molecular diagnostic method in the screening of 22q11.2DS and can be routinely applied for the diagnosis of deletion syndromes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7539069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75390692020-10-13 Screening of 22q11.2DS Using Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification as an Alternative Diagnostic Method Maran, Sathiya Faten, Siti Aisyah Lim, Swee-Hua Erin Lai, Kok-Song Ibrahim, Wan Pauzi Wan Ankathil, Ravindran Gan, Siew Hua Tan, Huay Lin Biomed Res Int Research Article BACKGROUND: The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is the most common form of deletion disorder in humans. Low copy repeats flanking the 22q11.2 region confers a substrate for nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) events leading to rearrangements which have been reported to be associated with highly variable and expansive phenotypes. The 22q11.2DS is reported as the most common genetic cause of congenital heart defects (CHDs). METHODS: A total of 42 patients with congenital heart defects, as confirmed by echocardiography, were recruited. Genetic molecular analysis using a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique was conducted as part of routine 22q11.2DS screening, followed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), which serves as a confirmatory test. RESULTS: Two of the 42 CHD cases (4.76%) indicated the presence of 22q11.2DS, and interestingly, both cases have conotruncal heart defects. In terms of concordance of techniques used, MLPA is superior since it can detect deletions within the 22q11.2 locus and outside of the typically deleted region (TDR) as well as duplications. CONCLUSION: The incidence of 22q11.2DS among patients with CHD in the east coast of Malaysia is 0.047. MLPA is a scalable and affordable alternative molecular diagnostic method in the screening of 22q11.2DS and can be routinely applied for the diagnosis of deletion syndromes. Hindawi 2020-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7539069/ /pubmed/33062692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6945730 Text en Copyright © 2020 Sathiya Maran et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Maran, Sathiya
Faten, Siti Aisyah
Lim, Swee-Hua Erin
Lai, Kok-Song
Ibrahim, Wan Pauzi Wan
Ankathil, Ravindran
Gan, Siew Hua
Tan, Huay Lin
Screening of 22q11.2DS Using Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification as an Alternative Diagnostic Method
title Screening of 22q11.2DS Using Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification as an Alternative Diagnostic Method
title_full Screening of 22q11.2DS Using Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification as an Alternative Diagnostic Method
title_fullStr Screening of 22q11.2DS Using Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification as an Alternative Diagnostic Method
title_full_unstemmed Screening of 22q11.2DS Using Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification as an Alternative Diagnostic Method
title_short Screening of 22q11.2DS Using Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification as an Alternative Diagnostic Method
title_sort screening of 22q11.2ds using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification as an alternative diagnostic method
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33062692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6945730
work_keys_str_mv AT maransathiya screeningof22q112dsusingmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationasanalternativediagnosticmethod
AT fatensitiaisyah screeningof22q112dsusingmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationasanalternativediagnosticmethod
AT limsweehuaerin screeningof22q112dsusingmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationasanalternativediagnosticmethod
AT laikoksong screeningof22q112dsusingmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationasanalternativediagnosticmethod
AT ibrahimwanpauziwan screeningof22q112dsusingmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationasanalternativediagnosticmethod
AT ankathilravindran screeningof22q112dsusingmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationasanalternativediagnosticmethod
AT gansiewhua screeningof22q112dsusingmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationasanalternativediagnosticmethod
AT tanhuaylin screeningof22q112dsusingmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationasanalternativediagnosticmethod