Cargando…

A practice improvement package at scale to improve management of birth asphyxia in Rwanda: a before-after mixed methods evaluation

BACKGROUND: Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) is a competency-based educational method for an evidence-based protocol to manage birth asphyxia in low resource settings. HBB has been shown to improve health worker skills and neonatal outcomes, but studies have documented problems with skills retention and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Umunyana, Jacqueline, Sayinzoga, Felix, Ricca, Jim, Favero, Rachel, Manariyo, Marcel, Kayinamura, Assumpta, Tayebwa, Edwin, Khadka, Neena, Molla, Yordanos, Kim, Young-Mi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33023484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03181-7
_version_ 1783591065974996992
author Umunyana, Jacqueline
Sayinzoga, Felix
Ricca, Jim
Favero, Rachel
Manariyo, Marcel
Kayinamura, Assumpta
Tayebwa, Edwin
Khadka, Neena
Molla, Yordanos
Kim, Young-Mi
author_facet Umunyana, Jacqueline
Sayinzoga, Felix
Ricca, Jim
Favero, Rachel
Manariyo, Marcel
Kayinamura, Assumpta
Tayebwa, Edwin
Khadka, Neena
Molla, Yordanos
Kim, Young-Mi
author_sort Umunyana, Jacqueline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) is a competency-based educational method for an evidence-based protocol to manage birth asphyxia in low resource settings. HBB has been shown to improve health worker skills and neonatal outcomes, but studies have documented problems with skills retention and little evidence of effectiveness at large scale in routine practice. This study examined the effect of complementing provider training with clinical mentorship and quality improvement as outlined in the second edition HBB materials. This “system-oriented” approach was implemented in all public health facilities (n = 172) in ten districts in Rwanda from 2015 to 2018. METHODS: A before-after mixed methods study assessed changes in provider skills and neonatal outcomes related to birth asphyxia. Mentee knowledge and skills were assessed with HBB objective structured clinical exam (OSCE) B pre and post training and during mentorship visits up to 1 year afterward. The study team extracted health outcome data across the entirety of intervention districts and conducted interviews to gather perspectives of providers and managers on the approach. RESULTS: Nearly 40 % (n = 772) of health workers in maternity units directly received mentorship. Of the mentees who received two or more visits (n = 456), 60 % demonstrated competence (received > 80% score on OSCE B) on the first mentorship visit, and 100% by the sixth. In a subset of 220 health workers followed for an average of 5 months after demonstrating competence, 98% maintained or improved their score. Three of the tracked neonatal health outcomes improved across the ten districts and the fourth just missed statistical significance: neonatal admissions due to asphyxia (37% reduction); fresh stillbirths (27% reduction); neonatal deaths due to asphyxia (13% reduction); and death within 30 min of birth (19% reduction, p = 0.06). Health workers expressed satisfaction with the clinical mentorship approach, noting improvements in confidence, patient flow within the maternity, and data use for decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Framing management of birth asphyxia within a larger quality improvement approach appears to contribute to success at scale. Clinical mentorship emerged as a critical element. The specific effect of individual components of the approach on provider skills and health outcomes requires further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7539497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75394972020-10-08 A practice improvement package at scale to improve management of birth asphyxia in Rwanda: a before-after mixed methods evaluation Umunyana, Jacqueline Sayinzoga, Felix Ricca, Jim Favero, Rachel Manariyo, Marcel Kayinamura, Assumpta Tayebwa, Edwin Khadka, Neena Molla, Yordanos Kim, Young-Mi BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) is a competency-based educational method for an evidence-based protocol to manage birth asphyxia in low resource settings. HBB has been shown to improve health worker skills and neonatal outcomes, but studies have documented problems with skills retention and little evidence of effectiveness at large scale in routine practice. This study examined the effect of complementing provider training with clinical mentorship and quality improvement as outlined in the second edition HBB materials. This “system-oriented” approach was implemented in all public health facilities (n = 172) in ten districts in Rwanda from 2015 to 2018. METHODS: A before-after mixed methods study assessed changes in provider skills and neonatal outcomes related to birth asphyxia. Mentee knowledge and skills were assessed with HBB objective structured clinical exam (OSCE) B pre and post training and during mentorship visits up to 1 year afterward. The study team extracted health outcome data across the entirety of intervention districts and conducted interviews to gather perspectives of providers and managers on the approach. RESULTS: Nearly 40 % (n = 772) of health workers in maternity units directly received mentorship. Of the mentees who received two or more visits (n = 456), 60 % demonstrated competence (received > 80% score on OSCE B) on the first mentorship visit, and 100% by the sixth. In a subset of 220 health workers followed for an average of 5 months after demonstrating competence, 98% maintained or improved their score. Three of the tracked neonatal health outcomes improved across the ten districts and the fourth just missed statistical significance: neonatal admissions due to asphyxia (37% reduction); fresh stillbirths (27% reduction); neonatal deaths due to asphyxia (13% reduction); and death within 30 min of birth (19% reduction, p = 0.06). Health workers expressed satisfaction with the clinical mentorship approach, noting improvements in confidence, patient flow within the maternity, and data use for decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Framing management of birth asphyxia within a larger quality improvement approach appears to contribute to success at scale. Clinical mentorship emerged as a critical element. The specific effect of individual components of the approach on provider skills and health outcomes requires further investigation. BioMed Central 2020-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7539497/ /pubmed/33023484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03181-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Umunyana, Jacqueline
Sayinzoga, Felix
Ricca, Jim
Favero, Rachel
Manariyo, Marcel
Kayinamura, Assumpta
Tayebwa, Edwin
Khadka, Neena
Molla, Yordanos
Kim, Young-Mi
A practice improvement package at scale to improve management of birth asphyxia in Rwanda: a before-after mixed methods evaluation
title A practice improvement package at scale to improve management of birth asphyxia in Rwanda: a before-after mixed methods evaluation
title_full A practice improvement package at scale to improve management of birth asphyxia in Rwanda: a before-after mixed methods evaluation
title_fullStr A practice improvement package at scale to improve management of birth asphyxia in Rwanda: a before-after mixed methods evaluation
title_full_unstemmed A practice improvement package at scale to improve management of birth asphyxia in Rwanda: a before-after mixed methods evaluation
title_short A practice improvement package at scale to improve management of birth asphyxia in Rwanda: a before-after mixed methods evaluation
title_sort practice improvement package at scale to improve management of birth asphyxia in rwanda: a before-after mixed methods evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33023484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03181-7
work_keys_str_mv AT umunyanajacqueline apracticeimprovementpackageatscaletoimprovemanagementofbirthasphyxiainrwandaabeforeaftermixedmethodsevaluation
AT sayinzogafelix apracticeimprovementpackageatscaletoimprovemanagementofbirthasphyxiainrwandaabeforeaftermixedmethodsevaluation
AT riccajim apracticeimprovementpackageatscaletoimprovemanagementofbirthasphyxiainrwandaabeforeaftermixedmethodsevaluation
AT faverorachel apracticeimprovementpackageatscaletoimprovemanagementofbirthasphyxiainrwandaabeforeaftermixedmethodsevaluation
AT manariyomarcel apracticeimprovementpackageatscaletoimprovemanagementofbirthasphyxiainrwandaabeforeaftermixedmethodsevaluation
AT kayinamuraassumpta apracticeimprovementpackageatscaletoimprovemanagementofbirthasphyxiainrwandaabeforeaftermixedmethodsevaluation
AT tayebwaedwin apracticeimprovementpackageatscaletoimprovemanagementofbirthasphyxiainrwandaabeforeaftermixedmethodsevaluation
AT khadkaneena apracticeimprovementpackageatscaletoimprovemanagementofbirthasphyxiainrwandaabeforeaftermixedmethodsevaluation
AT mollayordanos apracticeimprovementpackageatscaletoimprovemanagementofbirthasphyxiainrwandaabeforeaftermixedmethodsevaluation
AT kimyoungmi apracticeimprovementpackageatscaletoimprovemanagementofbirthasphyxiainrwandaabeforeaftermixedmethodsevaluation
AT umunyanajacqueline practiceimprovementpackageatscaletoimprovemanagementofbirthasphyxiainrwandaabeforeaftermixedmethodsevaluation
AT sayinzogafelix practiceimprovementpackageatscaletoimprovemanagementofbirthasphyxiainrwandaabeforeaftermixedmethodsevaluation
AT riccajim practiceimprovementpackageatscaletoimprovemanagementofbirthasphyxiainrwandaabeforeaftermixedmethodsevaluation
AT faverorachel practiceimprovementpackageatscaletoimprovemanagementofbirthasphyxiainrwandaabeforeaftermixedmethodsevaluation
AT manariyomarcel practiceimprovementpackageatscaletoimprovemanagementofbirthasphyxiainrwandaabeforeaftermixedmethodsevaluation
AT kayinamuraassumpta practiceimprovementpackageatscaletoimprovemanagementofbirthasphyxiainrwandaabeforeaftermixedmethodsevaluation
AT tayebwaedwin practiceimprovementpackageatscaletoimprovemanagementofbirthasphyxiainrwandaabeforeaftermixedmethodsevaluation
AT khadkaneena practiceimprovementpackageatscaletoimprovemanagementofbirthasphyxiainrwandaabeforeaftermixedmethodsevaluation
AT mollayordanos practiceimprovementpackageatscaletoimprovemanagementofbirthasphyxiainrwandaabeforeaftermixedmethodsevaluation
AT kimyoungmi practiceimprovementpackageatscaletoimprovemanagementofbirthasphyxiainrwandaabeforeaftermixedmethodsevaluation