Cargando…

Phasic pressure measurements for coronary and valvular interventions using fluid‐filled catheters: Errors, automated correction, and clinical implications

OBJECTIVES: We sought to develop an automatic method for correcting common errors in phasic pressure tracings for physiology‐guided interventions on coronary and valvular stenosis. BACKGROUND: Effective coronary and valvular interventions rely on accurate hemodynamic assessment. Phasic (subcycle) in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Daniel T., Fournier, Stephane, Kirkeeide, Richard L., De Bruyne, Bernard, Gould, K. Lance, Johnson, Nils P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32077561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28780
_version_ 1783591122845564928
author Johnson, Daniel T.
Fournier, Stephane
Kirkeeide, Richard L.
De Bruyne, Bernard
Gould, K. Lance
Johnson, Nils P.
author_facet Johnson, Daniel T.
Fournier, Stephane
Kirkeeide, Richard L.
De Bruyne, Bernard
Gould, K. Lance
Johnson, Nils P.
author_sort Johnson, Daniel T.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We sought to develop an automatic method for correcting common errors in phasic pressure tracings for physiology‐guided interventions on coronary and valvular stenosis. BACKGROUND: Effective coronary and valvular interventions rely on accurate hemodynamic assessment. Phasic (subcycle) indexes remain intrinsic to valvular stenosis and are emerging for coronary stenosis. Errors, corrections, and clinical implications of fluid‐filled catheter phasic pressure assessments have not been assessed in the current era of ubiquitous, high‐fidelity pressure wire sensors. METHODS: We recruited patients undergoing invasive coronary physiology assessment. Phasic aortic pressure signals were recorded simultaneously using a fluid‐filled guide catheter and 0.014″ pressure wire before and after standard calibration as well as after pullback. We included additional subjects undergoing hemodynamic assessment before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Using the pressure wire as reference standard, we developed an automatic algorithm to match phasic pressures. RESULTS: Removing pressure offset and temporal shift produced the largest improvements in root mean square (RMS) error between catheter and pressure wire signals. However, further optimization <1 mmHg RMS error was possible by accounting for differential gain and the oscillatory behavior of the fluid‐filled guide. The impact of correction was larger for subcycle (like systole or diastole) versus whole‐cycle metrics, indicating a key role for valvular stenosis and emerging coronary pressure ratios. CONCLUSIONS: When calibrating phasic aortic pressure signals using a pressure wire, correction requires these parameters: offset, timing, gain, and oscillations (frequency and damping factor). Automatically eliminating common errors may improve some clinical decisions regarding physiology‐based intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7539962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75399622020-10-09 Phasic pressure measurements for coronary and valvular interventions using fluid‐filled catheters: Errors, automated correction, and clinical implications Johnson, Daniel T. Fournier, Stephane Kirkeeide, Richard L. De Bruyne, Bernard Gould, K. Lance Johnson, Nils P. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE OBJECTIVES: We sought to develop an automatic method for correcting common errors in phasic pressure tracings for physiology‐guided interventions on coronary and valvular stenosis. BACKGROUND: Effective coronary and valvular interventions rely on accurate hemodynamic assessment. Phasic (subcycle) indexes remain intrinsic to valvular stenosis and are emerging for coronary stenosis. Errors, corrections, and clinical implications of fluid‐filled catheter phasic pressure assessments have not been assessed in the current era of ubiquitous, high‐fidelity pressure wire sensors. METHODS: We recruited patients undergoing invasive coronary physiology assessment. Phasic aortic pressure signals were recorded simultaneously using a fluid‐filled guide catheter and 0.014″ pressure wire before and after standard calibration as well as after pullback. We included additional subjects undergoing hemodynamic assessment before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Using the pressure wire as reference standard, we developed an automatic algorithm to match phasic pressures. RESULTS: Removing pressure offset and temporal shift produced the largest improvements in root mean square (RMS) error between catheter and pressure wire signals. However, further optimization <1 mmHg RMS error was possible by accounting for differential gain and the oscillatory behavior of the fluid‐filled guide. The impact of correction was larger for subcycle (like systole or diastole) versus whole‐cycle metrics, indicating a key role for valvular stenosis and emerging coronary pressure ratios. CONCLUSIONS: When calibrating phasic aortic pressure signals using a pressure wire, correction requires these parameters: offset, timing, gain, and oscillations (frequency and damping factor). Automatically eliminating common errors may improve some clinical decisions regarding physiology‐based intervention. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-02-20 2020-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7539962/ /pubmed/32077561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28780 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
Johnson, Daniel T.
Fournier, Stephane
Kirkeeide, Richard L.
De Bruyne, Bernard
Gould, K. Lance
Johnson, Nils P.
Phasic pressure measurements for coronary and valvular interventions using fluid‐filled catheters: Errors, automated correction, and clinical implications
title Phasic pressure measurements for coronary and valvular interventions using fluid‐filled catheters: Errors, automated correction, and clinical implications
title_full Phasic pressure measurements for coronary and valvular interventions using fluid‐filled catheters: Errors, automated correction, and clinical implications
title_fullStr Phasic pressure measurements for coronary and valvular interventions using fluid‐filled catheters: Errors, automated correction, and clinical implications
title_full_unstemmed Phasic pressure measurements for coronary and valvular interventions using fluid‐filled catheters: Errors, automated correction, and clinical implications
title_short Phasic pressure measurements for coronary and valvular interventions using fluid‐filled catheters: Errors, automated correction, and clinical implications
title_sort phasic pressure measurements for coronary and valvular interventions using fluid‐filled catheters: errors, automated correction, and clinical implications
topic CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32077561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28780
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsondanielt phasicpressuremeasurementsforcoronaryandvalvularinterventionsusingfluidfilledcatheterserrorsautomatedcorrectionandclinicalimplications
AT fournierstephane phasicpressuremeasurementsforcoronaryandvalvularinterventionsusingfluidfilledcatheterserrorsautomatedcorrectionandclinicalimplications
AT kirkeeiderichardl phasicpressuremeasurementsforcoronaryandvalvularinterventionsusingfluidfilledcatheterserrorsautomatedcorrectionandclinicalimplications
AT debruynebernard phasicpressuremeasurementsforcoronaryandvalvularinterventionsusingfluidfilledcatheterserrorsautomatedcorrectionandclinicalimplications
AT gouldklance phasicpressuremeasurementsforcoronaryandvalvularinterventionsusingfluidfilledcatheterserrorsautomatedcorrectionandclinicalimplications
AT johnsonnilsp phasicpressuremeasurementsforcoronaryandvalvularinterventionsusingfluidfilledcatheterserrorsautomatedcorrectionandclinicalimplications