Cargando…
“statcheck”: Automatically detect statistical reporting inconsistencies to increase reproducibility of meta‐analyses
We present the R package and web app statcheck to automatically detect statistical reporting inconsistencies in primary studies and meta‐analyses. Previous research has shown a high prevalence of reported p‐values that are inconsistent ‐ meaning a re‐calculated p‐value, based on the reported test st...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32275351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1408 |
_version_ | 1783591198041047040 |
---|---|
author | Nuijten, Michèle B. Polanin, Joshua R. |
author_facet | Nuijten, Michèle B. Polanin, Joshua R. |
author_sort | Nuijten, Michèle B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We present the R package and web app statcheck to automatically detect statistical reporting inconsistencies in primary studies and meta‐analyses. Previous research has shown a high prevalence of reported p‐values that are inconsistent ‐ meaning a re‐calculated p‐value, based on the reported test statistic and degrees of freedom, does not match the author‐reported p‐value. Such inconsistencies affect the reproducibility and evidential value of published findings. The tool statcheck can help researchers to identify statistical inconsistencies so that they may correct them. In this paper, we provide an overview of the prevalence and consequences of statistical reporting inconsistencies. We also discuss the tool statcheck in more detail and give an example of how it can be used in a meta‐analysis. We end with some recommendations concerning the use of statcheck in meta‐analyses and make a case for better reporting standards of statistical results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7540394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75403942020-10-09 “statcheck”: Automatically detect statistical reporting inconsistencies to increase reproducibility of meta‐analyses Nuijten, Michèle B. Polanin, Joshua R. Res Synth Methods Computational Tools and Methods We present the R package and web app statcheck to automatically detect statistical reporting inconsistencies in primary studies and meta‐analyses. Previous research has shown a high prevalence of reported p‐values that are inconsistent ‐ meaning a re‐calculated p‐value, based on the reported test statistic and degrees of freedom, does not match the author‐reported p‐value. Such inconsistencies affect the reproducibility and evidential value of published findings. The tool statcheck can help researchers to identify statistical inconsistencies so that they may correct them. In this paper, we provide an overview of the prevalence and consequences of statistical reporting inconsistencies. We also discuss the tool statcheck in more detail and give an example of how it can be used in a meta‐analysis. We end with some recommendations concerning the use of statcheck in meta‐analyses and make a case for better reporting standards of statistical results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-27 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7540394/ /pubmed/32275351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1408 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Research Synthesis Methods published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Computational Tools and Methods Nuijten, Michèle B. Polanin, Joshua R. “statcheck”: Automatically detect statistical reporting inconsistencies to increase reproducibility of meta‐analyses |
title | “statcheck”: Automatically detect statistical reporting inconsistencies to increase reproducibility of meta‐analyses
|
title_full | “statcheck”: Automatically detect statistical reporting inconsistencies to increase reproducibility of meta‐analyses
|
title_fullStr | “statcheck”: Automatically detect statistical reporting inconsistencies to increase reproducibility of meta‐analyses
|
title_full_unstemmed | “statcheck”: Automatically detect statistical reporting inconsistencies to increase reproducibility of meta‐analyses
|
title_short | “statcheck”: Automatically detect statistical reporting inconsistencies to increase reproducibility of meta‐analyses
|
title_sort | “statcheck”: automatically detect statistical reporting inconsistencies to increase reproducibility of meta‐analyses |
topic | Computational Tools and Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32275351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1408 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nuijtenmicheleb statcheckautomaticallydetectstatisticalreportinginconsistenciestoincreasereproducibilityofmetaanalyses AT polaninjoshuar statcheckautomaticallydetectstatisticalreportinginconsistenciestoincreasereproducibilityofmetaanalyses |