Cargando…
A Phase 2, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Trial to Investigate Potential Drug‐Drug Interactions Between Cannabidiol and Clobazam
We investigated the effects of cannabidiol (CBD; 21‐day maintenance dose) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of clobazam (CLB) and monitored the safety of CBD (or placebo) plus CLB in 20 patients with uncontrolled epilepsy on stable doses of CLB. Blood samples collected until 24 hours postdose were evalua...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32652616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcph.1634 |
Sumario: | We investigated the effects of cannabidiol (CBD; 21‐day maintenance dose) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of clobazam (CLB) and monitored the safety of CBD (or placebo) plus CLB in 20 patients with uncontrolled epilepsy on stable doses of CLB. Blood samples collected until 24 hours postdose were evaluated by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters of CLB and major metabolite N‐desmethylclobazam (N‐CLB), valproic acid, stiripentol, levetiracetam, topiramate, plant‐derived highly purified CBD (Epidiolex in the United States; 100 mg/mL oral solution) and its major metabolites were derived using noncompartmental analysis. There was no evidence of a drug‐drug interaction (DDI) between CBD and CLB: geometric mean ratio (GMR) of day 33:day 1 CLB was 1.0 (90%CI, 0.8‐1.2) for C(max) and 1.1 (90%CI, 0.9‐1.2) for AUC(tau). There was a significant DDI between CBD and N‐CLB: the GMR of day 33:day 1 N‐CLB was 2.2 (90%CI, 1.4‐3.5) for C(max) and 2.6 (90%CI, 2.0‐3.6) for AUC(tau). Placebo had no effect on CLB or N‐CLB; CBD had no effect on levetiracetam. Data were insufficient regarding DDIs with other antiepileptic drugs. The safety profile of CBD (20 mg/kg/day) with CLB was acceptable; all but 1 adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate. One serious AE (seizure cluster) led to CBD discontinuation. One patient withdrew after intolerable AEs. Although there was no evidence of a CBD and CLB DDI, there was a significant DDI between CBD and N‐CLB. The safety profile of GW Pharmaceuticals’ CBD formulation with CLB was consistent with other GW‐sponsored trials. |
---|