Cargando…

Gabapentin Enacarbil Extended‐Release Versus Placebo: A Likely Responder Reanalysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: We reanalyzed a multisite 26‐week randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled clinical trial of 600 mg twice‐a‐day Gabapentin Enacarbil Extended‐Release (GE‐XR), a gabapentin prodrug, designed to evaluate safety and efficacy for treating alcohol use disorder. In the original analysis (n =...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laska, Eugene M., Siegel, Carole E., Lin, Ziqiang, Bogenschutz, Michael, Marmar, Charles R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33460198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acer.14414
_version_ 1783591230967382016
author Laska, Eugene M.
Siegel, Carole E.
Lin, Ziqiang
Bogenschutz, Michael
Marmar, Charles R.
author_facet Laska, Eugene M.
Siegel, Carole E.
Lin, Ziqiang
Bogenschutz, Michael
Marmar, Charles R.
author_sort Laska, Eugene M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We reanalyzed a multisite 26‐week randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled clinical trial of 600 mg twice‐a‐day Gabapentin Enacarbil Extended‐Release (GE‐XR), a gabapentin prodrug, designed to evaluate safety and efficacy for treating alcohol use disorder. In the original analysis (n = 338), published in 2019, GE‐XR did not differ from placebo. Our aim is to advance precision medicine by identifying likely responders to GE‐XR from the trial data and to determine for likely responders if GE‐XR is causally superior to placebo. METHODS: The primary outcome measure in the reanalysis is the reduction from baseline of the number of heavy drinking days (ΔHDD). Baseline features including measures of alcohol use, anxiety, depression, mood states, sleep, and impulsivity were used in a random forest (RF) model to predict ΔHDD to treatment with GE‐XR based on those assigned to GE‐XR. The resulting RF model was used to obtain predicted outcomes for those randomized to GE‐XR and counterfactually to those randomized to placebo. Likely responders to GE‐XR were defined as those predicted to have a reduction of 14 days or more. Tests of causal superiority of GE‐XR to placebo were obtained for likely responders and for the whole sample. RESULTS: For likely responders, GE‐XR was causally superior to placebo (p < 0.0033), while for the whole sample, there was no difference. Likely responders exhibited improved outcomes for the related outcomes of percent HDD and drinks per week. Compared with unlikely responders, at baseline likely responders had higher HDDs; lower levels of anxiety, depression, and general mood disturbances; and higher levels of cognitive and motor impulsivity. CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial causal benefits of treatment with GE‐XR for a subset of patients predicted to be likely responders. The likely responder statistical paradigm is a promising approach for analyzing randomized clinical trials to advance personalized treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7540534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75405342020-10-09 Gabapentin Enacarbil Extended‐Release Versus Placebo: A Likely Responder Reanalysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial Laska, Eugene M. Siegel, Carole E. Lin, Ziqiang Bogenschutz, Michael Marmar, Charles R. Alcohol Clin Exp Res Behavior, Treatment and Prevention BACKGROUND: We reanalyzed a multisite 26‐week randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled clinical trial of 600 mg twice‐a‐day Gabapentin Enacarbil Extended‐Release (GE‐XR), a gabapentin prodrug, designed to evaluate safety and efficacy for treating alcohol use disorder. In the original analysis (n = 338), published in 2019, GE‐XR did not differ from placebo. Our aim is to advance precision medicine by identifying likely responders to GE‐XR from the trial data and to determine for likely responders if GE‐XR is causally superior to placebo. METHODS: The primary outcome measure in the reanalysis is the reduction from baseline of the number of heavy drinking days (ΔHDD). Baseline features including measures of alcohol use, anxiety, depression, mood states, sleep, and impulsivity were used in a random forest (RF) model to predict ΔHDD to treatment with GE‐XR based on those assigned to GE‐XR. The resulting RF model was used to obtain predicted outcomes for those randomized to GE‐XR and counterfactually to those randomized to placebo. Likely responders to GE‐XR were defined as those predicted to have a reduction of 14 days or more. Tests of causal superiority of GE‐XR to placebo were obtained for likely responders and for the whole sample. RESULTS: For likely responders, GE‐XR was causally superior to placebo (p < 0.0033), while for the whole sample, there was no difference. Likely responders exhibited improved outcomes for the related outcomes of percent HDD and drinks per week. Compared with unlikely responders, at baseline likely responders had higher HDDs; lower levels of anxiety, depression, and general mood disturbances; and higher levels of cognitive and motor impulsivity. CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial causal benefits of treatment with GE‐XR for a subset of patients predicted to be likely responders. The likely responder statistical paradigm is a promising approach for analyzing randomized clinical trials to advance personalized treatment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-31 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7540534/ /pubmed/33460198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acer.14414 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Research Society on Alcoholism This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Behavior, Treatment and Prevention
Laska, Eugene M.
Siegel, Carole E.
Lin, Ziqiang
Bogenschutz, Michael
Marmar, Charles R.
Gabapentin Enacarbil Extended‐Release Versus Placebo: A Likely Responder Reanalysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
title Gabapentin Enacarbil Extended‐Release Versus Placebo: A Likely Responder Reanalysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Gabapentin Enacarbil Extended‐Release Versus Placebo: A Likely Responder Reanalysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Gabapentin Enacarbil Extended‐Release Versus Placebo: A Likely Responder Reanalysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Gabapentin Enacarbil Extended‐Release Versus Placebo: A Likely Responder Reanalysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Gabapentin Enacarbil Extended‐Release Versus Placebo: A Likely Responder Reanalysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort gabapentin enacarbil extended‐release versus placebo: a likely responder reanalysis of a randomized clinical trial
topic Behavior, Treatment and Prevention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33460198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acer.14414
work_keys_str_mv AT laskaeugenem gabapentinenacarbilextendedreleaseversusplaceboalikelyresponderreanalysisofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT siegelcarolee gabapentinenacarbilextendedreleaseversusplaceboalikelyresponderreanalysisofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT linziqiang gabapentinenacarbilextendedreleaseversusplaceboalikelyresponderreanalysisofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bogenschutzmichael gabapentinenacarbilextendedreleaseversusplaceboalikelyresponderreanalysisofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT marmarcharlesr gabapentinenacarbilextendedreleaseversusplaceboalikelyresponderreanalysisofarandomizedclinicaltrial