Cargando…

Concentric vs. eccentric remodelling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: clinical characteristics, pathophysiology and response to treatment

AIMS: Heart failure is traditionally classified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), rather than by left ventricular (LV) geometry, with guideline‐recommended therapies in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but not heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nauta, Jan F., Hummel, Yoran M., Tromp, Jasper, Ouwerkerk, Wouter, van der Meer, Peter, Jin, Xuanyi, Lam, Carolyn S.P., Bax, Jeroen J., Metra, Marco, Samani, Nilesh J., Ponikowski, Piotr, Dickstein, Kenneth, Anker, Stefan D., Lang, Chim C., Ng, Leong L., Zannad, Faiez, Filippatos, Gerasimos S., van Veldhuisen, Dirk J., van Melle, Joost P., Voors, Adriaan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31713324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1632
_version_ 1783591232354648064
author Nauta, Jan F.
Hummel, Yoran M.
Tromp, Jasper
Ouwerkerk, Wouter
van der Meer, Peter
Jin, Xuanyi
Lam, Carolyn S.P.
Bax, Jeroen J.
Metra, Marco
Samani, Nilesh J.
Ponikowski, Piotr
Dickstein, Kenneth
Anker, Stefan D.
Lang, Chim C.
Ng, Leong L.
Zannad, Faiez
Filippatos, Gerasimos S.
van Veldhuisen, Dirk J.
van Melle, Joost P.
Voors, Adriaan A.
author_facet Nauta, Jan F.
Hummel, Yoran M.
Tromp, Jasper
Ouwerkerk, Wouter
van der Meer, Peter
Jin, Xuanyi
Lam, Carolyn S.P.
Bax, Jeroen J.
Metra, Marco
Samani, Nilesh J.
Ponikowski, Piotr
Dickstein, Kenneth
Anker, Stefan D.
Lang, Chim C.
Ng, Leong L.
Zannad, Faiez
Filippatos, Gerasimos S.
van Veldhuisen, Dirk J.
van Melle, Joost P.
Voors, Adriaan A.
author_sort Nauta, Jan F.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Heart failure is traditionally classified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), rather than by left ventricular (LV) geometry, with guideline‐recommended therapies in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but not heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Most patients with HFrEF have eccentric LV hypertrophy, but some have concentric LV hypertrophy. We aimed to compare clinical characteristics, biomarker patterns, and response to treatment of patients with HFrEF and eccentric vs. concentric LV hypertrophy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective post‐hoc analysis including 1015 patients with HFrEF (LVEF <40%) from the multinational observational BIOSTAT‐CHF study. LV geometry was classified using two‐dimensional echocardiography. Network analysis of 92 biomarkers was used to investigate pathophysiologic pathways. Concentric LV hypertrophy was present in 142 (14%) patients, who were on average older and more likely hypertensive compared to those with eccentric LV hypertrophy. Network analysis revealed that N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide was an important hub in eccentric hypertrophy, whereas in concentric hypertrophy, tumour necrosis factor receptor 1, urokinase plasminogen activator surface receptor, paraoxonase and P‐selectin were central hubs. Up‐titration of beta‐blockers was associated with a mortality benefit in HFrEF with eccentric but not concentric LV hypertrophy (P‐value for interaction ≤0.001). For angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, the hazard ratio for mortality was higher in concentric hypertrophy, but the interaction was not significant. CONCLUSION: Patients with HFrEF with concentric hypertrophy have a clinical and biomarker phenotype that is distinctly different from those with eccentric hypertrophy. Patients with concentric hypertrophy may not experience similar benefit from up.‐titration of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and beta‐blockers compared to patients with eccentric hypertrophy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7540540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75405402020-10-09 Concentric vs. eccentric remodelling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: clinical characteristics, pathophysiology and response to treatment Nauta, Jan F. Hummel, Yoran M. Tromp, Jasper Ouwerkerk, Wouter van der Meer, Peter Jin, Xuanyi Lam, Carolyn S.P. Bax, Jeroen J. Metra, Marco Samani, Nilesh J. Ponikowski, Piotr Dickstein, Kenneth Anker, Stefan D. Lang, Chim C. Ng, Leong L. Zannad, Faiez Filippatos, Gerasimos S. van Veldhuisen, Dirk J. van Melle, Joost P. Voors, Adriaan A. Eur J Heart Fail LV Remodelling AIMS: Heart failure is traditionally classified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), rather than by left ventricular (LV) geometry, with guideline‐recommended therapies in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but not heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Most patients with HFrEF have eccentric LV hypertrophy, but some have concentric LV hypertrophy. We aimed to compare clinical characteristics, biomarker patterns, and response to treatment of patients with HFrEF and eccentric vs. concentric LV hypertrophy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective post‐hoc analysis including 1015 patients with HFrEF (LVEF <40%) from the multinational observational BIOSTAT‐CHF study. LV geometry was classified using two‐dimensional echocardiography. Network analysis of 92 biomarkers was used to investigate pathophysiologic pathways. Concentric LV hypertrophy was present in 142 (14%) patients, who were on average older and more likely hypertensive compared to those with eccentric LV hypertrophy. Network analysis revealed that N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide was an important hub in eccentric hypertrophy, whereas in concentric hypertrophy, tumour necrosis factor receptor 1, urokinase plasminogen activator surface receptor, paraoxonase and P‐selectin were central hubs. Up‐titration of beta‐blockers was associated with a mortality benefit in HFrEF with eccentric but not concentric LV hypertrophy (P‐value for interaction ≤0.001). For angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, the hazard ratio for mortality was higher in concentric hypertrophy, but the interaction was not significant. CONCLUSION: Patients with HFrEF with concentric hypertrophy have a clinical and biomarker phenotype that is distinctly different from those with eccentric hypertrophy. Patients with concentric hypertrophy may not experience similar benefit from up.‐titration of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and beta‐blockers compared to patients with eccentric hypertrophy. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2019-11-11 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7540540/ /pubmed/31713324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1632 Text en © 2019 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle LV Remodelling
Nauta, Jan F.
Hummel, Yoran M.
Tromp, Jasper
Ouwerkerk, Wouter
van der Meer, Peter
Jin, Xuanyi
Lam, Carolyn S.P.
Bax, Jeroen J.
Metra, Marco
Samani, Nilesh J.
Ponikowski, Piotr
Dickstein, Kenneth
Anker, Stefan D.
Lang, Chim C.
Ng, Leong L.
Zannad, Faiez
Filippatos, Gerasimos S.
van Veldhuisen, Dirk J.
van Melle, Joost P.
Voors, Adriaan A.
Concentric vs. eccentric remodelling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: clinical characteristics, pathophysiology and response to treatment
title Concentric vs. eccentric remodelling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: clinical characteristics, pathophysiology and response to treatment
title_full Concentric vs. eccentric remodelling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: clinical characteristics, pathophysiology and response to treatment
title_fullStr Concentric vs. eccentric remodelling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: clinical characteristics, pathophysiology and response to treatment
title_full_unstemmed Concentric vs. eccentric remodelling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: clinical characteristics, pathophysiology and response to treatment
title_short Concentric vs. eccentric remodelling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: clinical characteristics, pathophysiology and response to treatment
title_sort concentric vs. eccentric remodelling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: clinical characteristics, pathophysiology and response to treatment
topic LV Remodelling
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31713324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1632
work_keys_str_mv AT nautajanf concentricvseccentricremodellinginheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionclinicalcharacteristicspathophysiologyandresponsetotreatment
AT hummelyoranm concentricvseccentricremodellinginheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionclinicalcharacteristicspathophysiologyandresponsetotreatment
AT trompjasper concentricvseccentricremodellinginheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionclinicalcharacteristicspathophysiologyandresponsetotreatment
AT ouwerkerkwouter concentricvseccentricremodellinginheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionclinicalcharacteristicspathophysiologyandresponsetotreatment
AT vandermeerpeter concentricvseccentricremodellinginheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionclinicalcharacteristicspathophysiologyandresponsetotreatment
AT jinxuanyi concentricvseccentricremodellinginheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionclinicalcharacteristicspathophysiologyandresponsetotreatment
AT lamcarolynsp concentricvseccentricremodellinginheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionclinicalcharacteristicspathophysiologyandresponsetotreatment
AT baxjeroenj concentricvseccentricremodellinginheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionclinicalcharacteristicspathophysiologyandresponsetotreatment
AT metramarco concentricvseccentricremodellinginheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionclinicalcharacteristicspathophysiologyandresponsetotreatment
AT samaninileshj concentricvseccentricremodellinginheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionclinicalcharacteristicspathophysiologyandresponsetotreatment
AT ponikowskipiotr concentricvseccentricremodellinginheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionclinicalcharacteristicspathophysiologyandresponsetotreatment
AT dicksteinkenneth concentricvseccentricremodellinginheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionclinicalcharacteristicspathophysiologyandresponsetotreatment
AT ankerstefand concentricvseccentricremodellinginheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionclinicalcharacteristicspathophysiologyandresponsetotreatment
AT langchimc concentricvseccentricremodellinginheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionclinicalcharacteristicspathophysiologyandresponsetotreatment
AT ngleongl concentricvseccentricremodellinginheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionclinicalcharacteristicspathophysiologyandresponsetotreatment
AT zannadfaiez concentricvseccentricremodellinginheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionclinicalcharacteristicspathophysiologyandresponsetotreatment
AT filippatosgerasimoss concentricvseccentricremodellinginheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionclinicalcharacteristicspathophysiologyandresponsetotreatment
AT vanveldhuisendirkj concentricvseccentricremodellinginheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionclinicalcharacteristicspathophysiologyandresponsetotreatment
AT vanmellejoostp concentricvseccentricremodellinginheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionclinicalcharacteristicspathophysiologyandresponsetotreatment
AT voorsadriaana concentricvseccentricremodellinginheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionclinicalcharacteristicspathophysiologyandresponsetotreatment