Cargando…
Diagnosing developmental prosopagnosia: repeat assessment using the Cambridge Face Memory Test
Developmental prosopagnosia (DP) is a cognitive condition characterized by a relatively selective impairment in face recognition. Currently, people are screened for DP via a single attempt at objective face-processing tests, usually all presented on the same day. However, several variables probably...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33047048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200884 |
_version_ | 1783591279563636736 |
---|---|
author | Murray, Ebony Bate, Sarah |
author_facet | Murray, Ebony Bate, Sarah |
author_sort | Murray, Ebony |
collection | PubMed |
description | Developmental prosopagnosia (DP) is a cognitive condition characterized by a relatively selective impairment in face recognition. Currently, people are screened for DP via a single attempt at objective face-processing tests, usually all presented on the same day. However, several variables probably influence performance on these tests irrespective of actual ability, and the influence of repeat administration is also unknown. Here, we assess, for the first known time, the test–retest reliability of the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT)—the leading task used worldwide to diagnose DP. This value was found to fall just below psychometric standards, and single-case analyses revealed further inconsistencies in performance that were not driven by testing location (online or in-person), nor the time-lapse between attempts. Later administration of an alternative version of the CFMT (the CFMT-Aus) was also found to be valuable in confirming borderline cases. Finally, we found that performance on the first 48 trials of the CFMT was equally as sensitive as the full 72-item score, suggesting that the instrument may be shortened for testing efficiency. We consider the implications of these findings for existing diagnostic protocols, concluding that two independent tasks of unfamiliar face memory should be completed on separate days. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7540801 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75408012020-10-11 Diagnosing developmental prosopagnosia: repeat assessment using the Cambridge Face Memory Test Murray, Ebony Bate, Sarah R Soc Open Sci Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Developmental prosopagnosia (DP) is a cognitive condition characterized by a relatively selective impairment in face recognition. Currently, people are screened for DP via a single attempt at objective face-processing tests, usually all presented on the same day. However, several variables probably influence performance on these tests irrespective of actual ability, and the influence of repeat administration is also unknown. Here, we assess, for the first known time, the test–retest reliability of the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT)—the leading task used worldwide to diagnose DP. This value was found to fall just below psychometric standards, and single-case analyses revealed further inconsistencies in performance that were not driven by testing location (online or in-person), nor the time-lapse between attempts. Later administration of an alternative version of the CFMT (the CFMT-Aus) was also found to be valuable in confirming borderline cases. Finally, we found that performance on the first 48 trials of the CFMT was equally as sensitive as the full 72-item score, suggesting that the instrument may be shortened for testing efficiency. We consider the implications of these findings for existing diagnostic protocols, concluding that two independent tasks of unfamiliar face memory should be completed on separate days. The Royal Society 2020-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7540801/ /pubmed/33047048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200884 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Murray, Ebony Bate, Sarah Diagnosing developmental prosopagnosia: repeat assessment using the Cambridge Face Memory Test |
title | Diagnosing developmental prosopagnosia: repeat assessment using the Cambridge Face Memory Test |
title_full | Diagnosing developmental prosopagnosia: repeat assessment using the Cambridge Face Memory Test |
title_fullStr | Diagnosing developmental prosopagnosia: repeat assessment using the Cambridge Face Memory Test |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnosing developmental prosopagnosia: repeat assessment using the Cambridge Face Memory Test |
title_short | Diagnosing developmental prosopagnosia: repeat assessment using the Cambridge Face Memory Test |
title_sort | diagnosing developmental prosopagnosia: repeat assessment using the cambridge face memory test |
topic | Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33047048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200884 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murrayebony diagnosingdevelopmentalprosopagnosiarepeatassessmentusingthecambridgefacememorytest AT batesarah diagnosingdevelopmentalprosopagnosiarepeatassessmentusingthecambridgefacememorytest |