Cargando…

R‐CHOP‐14 versus R‐CHOP‐14/CHASER for upfront autologous transplantation in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: JCOG0908 study

The efficiency of upfront consolidation with high‐dose chemotherapy/autologous stem‐cell transplantation (HDCT/ASCT) for newly diagnosed high‐risk diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) may be influenced by induction chemotherapy. To select better induction chemotherapy regimens for HDCT/ASCT, a rand...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kagami, Yoshitoyo, Yamamoto, Kazuhito, Shibata, Taro, Tobinai, Kensei, Imaizumi, Yoshitaka, Uchida, Toshiki, Shimada, Kazuyuki, Minauchi, Koichiro, Fukuhara, Noriko, Kobayashi, Hirofumi, Yamauchi, Nobuhiko, Tsujimura, Hideki, Hangaishi, Akira, Tominaga, Ryo, Suehiro, Youko, Yoshida, Shinichiro, Inoue, Yoshiko, Suzuki, Sachiko, Tokuhira, Michihide, Kusumoto, Shigeru, Kuroda, Junya, Yakushijin, Yoshihiro, Takamatsu, Yasushi, Kubota, Yasushi, Nosaka, Kisato, Morishima, Satoko, Nakamura, Shigeo, Ogura, Michinori, Maruyama, Dai, Hotta, Tomomitsu, Morishima, Yasuo, Tsukasaki, Kunihiro, Nagai, Hirokazu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32767806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.14604
_version_ 1783591312613703680
author Kagami, Yoshitoyo
Yamamoto, Kazuhito
Shibata, Taro
Tobinai, Kensei
Imaizumi, Yoshitaka
Uchida, Toshiki
Shimada, Kazuyuki
Minauchi, Koichiro
Fukuhara, Noriko
Kobayashi, Hirofumi
Yamauchi, Nobuhiko
Tsujimura, Hideki
Hangaishi, Akira
Tominaga, Ryo
Suehiro, Youko
Yoshida, Shinichiro
Inoue, Yoshiko
Suzuki, Sachiko
Tokuhira, Michihide
Kusumoto, Shigeru
Kuroda, Junya
Yakushijin, Yoshihiro
Takamatsu, Yasushi
Kubota, Yasushi
Nosaka, Kisato
Morishima, Satoko
Nakamura, Shigeo
Ogura, Michinori
Maruyama, Dai
Hotta, Tomomitsu
Morishima, Yasuo
Tsukasaki, Kunihiro
Nagai, Hirokazu
author_facet Kagami, Yoshitoyo
Yamamoto, Kazuhito
Shibata, Taro
Tobinai, Kensei
Imaizumi, Yoshitaka
Uchida, Toshiki
Shimada, Kazuyuki
Minauchi, Koichiro
Fukuhara, Noriko
Kobayashi, Hirofumi
Yamauchi, Nobuhiko
Tsujimura, Hideki
Hangaishi, Akira
Tominaga, Ryo
Suehiro, Youko
Yoshida, Shinichiro
Inoue, Yoshiko
Suzuki, Sachiko
Tokuhira, Michihide
Kusumoto, Shigeru
Kuroda, Junya
Yakushijin, Yoshihiro
Takamatsu, Yasushi
Kubota, Yasushi
Nosaka, Kisato
Morishima, Satoko
Nakamura, Shigeo
Ogura, Michinori
Maruyama, Dai
Hotta, Tomomitsu
Morishima, Yasuo
Tsukasaki, Kunihiro
Nagai, Hirokazu
author_sort Kagami, Yoshitoyo
collection PubMed
description The efficiency of upfront consolidation with high‐dose chemotherapy/autologous stem‐cell transplantation (HDCT/ASCT) for newly diagnosed high‐risk diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) may be influenced by induction chemotherapy. To select better induction chemotherapy regimens for HDCT/ASCT, a randomized phase II study was conducted in high‐risk DLBCL patients having an age‐adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 or 3. As induction chemotherapy, 6 cycles of R‐CHOP‐14 (arm A) or 3 cycles of R‐CHOP‐14 followed by 3 cycles of CHASER (arm B) were planned, and patients who responded proceeded to HDCT with LEED and ASCT. The primary endpoint was 2‐y progression‐free survival (PFS), and the main secondary endpoints included overall survival, overall response rate, and adverse events (AEs). In total, 71 patients were enrolled. With a median follow‐up of 40.3 mo, 2‐y PFS in arms A and B were 68.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.5%‐81.2%) and 66.7% (95% CI: 48.8%‐79.5%), respectively. Overall survival at 2 y in arms A and B was 74.3% (95% CI: 56.4%‐85.7%) and 83.3% (95% CI: 66.6%‐92.1%). Overall response rates were 82.9% in arm A and 69.4% in arm B. During induction chemotherapy, 45.7% and 75.0% of patients in arms A and B, respectively, had grade ≥ 3 non‐hematologic toxicities. One patient in arm A and 6 in arm B discontinued induction chemotherapy due to AEs. In conclusion, R‐CHOP‐14 showed higher 2‐y PFS and less toxicity compared with R‐CHOP‐14/CHASER in patients with high‐risk DLBCL, suggesting the former to be a more promising induction regimen for further investigations (UMIN‐CTR, UMIN000003823).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7540987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75409872020-10-09 R‐CHOP‐14 versus R‐CHOP‐14/CHASER for upfront autologous transplantation in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: JCOG0908 study Kagami, Yoshitoyo Yamamoto, Kazuhito Shibata, Taro Tobinai, Kensei Imaizumi, Yoshitaka Uchida, Toshiki Shimada, Kazuyuki Minauchi, Koichiro Fukuhara, Noriko Kobayashi, Hirofumi Yamauchi, Nobuhiko Tsujimura, Hideki Hangaishi, Akira Tominaga, Ryo Suehiro, Youko Yoshida, Shinichiro Inoue, Yoshiko Suzuki, Sachiko Tokuhira, Michihide Kusumoto, Shigeru Kuroda, Junya Yakushijin, Yoshihiro Takamatsu, Yasushi Kubota, Yasushi Nosaka, Kisato Morishima, Satoko Nakamura, Shigeo Ogura, Michinori Maruyama, Dai Hotta, Tomomitsu Morishima, Yasuo Tsukasaki, Kunihiro Nagai, Hirokazu Cancer Sci Clinical Research The efficiency of upfront consolidation with high‐dose chemotherapy/autologous stem‐cell transplantation (HDCT/ASCT) for newly diagnosed high‐risk diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) may be influenced by induction chemotherapy. To select better induction chemotherapy regimens for HDCT/ASCT, a randomized phase II study was conducted in high‐risk DLBCL patients having an age‐adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 or 3. As induction chemotherapy, 6 cycles of R‐CHOP‐14 (arm A) or 3 cycles of R‐CHOP‐14 followed by 3 cycles of CHASER (arm B) were planned, and patients who responded proceeded to HDCT with LEED and ASCT. The primary endpoint was 2‐y progression‐free survival (PFS), and the main secondary endpoints included overall survival, overall response rate, and adverse events (AEs). In total, 71 patients were enrolled. With a median follow‐up of 40.3 mo, 2‐y PFS in arms A and B were 68.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.5%‐81.2%) and 66.7% (95% CI: 48.8%‐79.5%), respectively. Overall survival at 2 y in arms A and B was 74.3% (95% CI: 56.4%‐85.7%) and 83.3% (95% CI: 66.6%‐92.1%). Overall response rates were 82.9% in arm A and 69.4% in arm B. During induction chemotherapy, 45.7% and 75.0% of patients in arms A and B, respectively, had grade ≥ 3 non‐hematologic toxicities. One patient in arm A and 6 in arm B discontinued induction chemotherapy due to AEs. In conclusion, R‐CHOP‐14 showed higher 2‐y PFS and less toxicity compared with R‐CHOP‐14/CHASER in patients with high‐risk DLBCL, suggesting the former to be a more promising induction regimen for further investigations (UMIN‐CTR, UMIN000003823). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-11 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7540987/ /pubmed/32767806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.14604 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Kagami, Yoshitoyo
Yamamoto, Kazuhito
Shibata, Taro
Tobinai, Kensei
Imaizumi, Yoshitaka
Uchida, Toshiki
Shimada, Kazuyuki
Minauchi, Koichiro
Fukuhara, Noriko
Kobayashi, Hirofumi
Yamauchi, Nobuhiko
Tsujimura, Hideki
Hangaishi, Akira
Tominaga, Ryo
Suehiro, Youko
Yoshida, Shinichiro
Inoue, Yoshiko
Suzuki, Sachiko
Tokuhira, Michihide
Kusumoto, Shigeru
Kuroda, Junya
Yakushijin, Yoshihiro
Takamatsu, Yasushi
Kubota, Yasushi
Nosaka, Kisato
Morishima, Satoko
Nakamura, Shigeo
Ogura, Michinori
Maruyama, Dai
Hotta, Tomomitsu
Morishima, Yasuo
Tsukasaki, Kunihiro
Nagai, Hirokazu
R‐CHOP‐14 versus R‐CHOP‐14/CHASER for upfront autologous transplantation in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: JCOG0908 study
title R‐CHOP‐14 versus R‐CHOP‐14/CHASER for upfront autologous transplantation in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: JCOG0908 study
title_full R‐CHOP‐14 versus R‐CHOP‐14/CHASER for upfront autologous transplantation in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: JCOG0908 study
title_fullStr R‐CHOP‐14 versus R‐CHOP‐14/CHASER for upfront autologous transplantation in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: JCOG0908 study
title_full_unstemmed R‐CHOP‐14 versus R‐CHOP‐14/CHASER for upfront autologous transplantation in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: JCOG0908 study
title_short R‐CHOP‐14 versus R‐CHOP‐14/CHASER for upfront autologous transplantation in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: JCOG0908 study
title_sort r‐chop‐14 versus r‐chop‐14/chaser for upfront autologous transplantation in diffuse large b‐cell lymphoma: jcog0908 study
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32767806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.14604
work_keys_str_mv AT kagamiyoshitoyo rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT yamamotokazuhito rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT shibatataro rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT tobinaikensei rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT imaizumiyoshitaka rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT uchidatoshiki rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT shimadakazuyuki rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT minauchikoichiro rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT fukuharanoriko rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT kobayashihirofumi rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT yamauchinobuhiko rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT tsujimurahideki rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT hangaishiakira rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT tominagaryo rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT suehiroyouko rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT yoshidashinichiro rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT inoueyoshiko rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT suzukisachiko rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT tokuhiramichihide rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT kusumotoshigeru rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT kurodajunya rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT yakushijinyoshihiro rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT takamatsuyasushi rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT kubotayasushi rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT nosakakisato rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT morishimasatoko rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT nakamurashigeo rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT oguramichinori rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT maruyamadai rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT hottatomomitsu rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT morishimayasuo rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT tsukasakikunihiro rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study
AT nagaihirokazu rchop14versusrchop14chaserforupfrontautologoustransplantationindiffuselargebcelllymphomajcog0908study