Cargando…
Clinical Predictive Models for COVID-19: Systematic Study
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is a rapidly emerging respiratory disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. Due to the rapid human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2, many health care systems are at risk of exceeding their health care capacities, in particular in terms of SARS-CoV-2 tests, hospital and intensive care uni...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7541040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32976111 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/21439 |
_version_ | 1783591321919815680 |
---|---|
author | Schwab, Patrick DuMont Schütte, August Dietz, Benedikt Bauer, Stefan |
author_facet | Schwab, Patrick DuMont Schütte, August Dietz, Benedikt Bauer, Stefan |
author_sort | Schwab, Patrick |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is a rapidly emerging respiratory disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. Due to the rapid human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2, many health care systems are at risk of exceeding their health care capacities, in particular in terms of SARS-CoV-2 tests, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) beds, and mechanical ventilators. Predictive algorithms could potentially ease the strain on health care systems by identifying those who are most likely to receive a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, be hospitalized, or admitted to the ICU. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to develop, study, and evaluate clinical predictive models that estimate, using machine learning and based on routinely collected clinical data, which patients are likely to receive a positive SARS-CoV-2 test or require hospitalization or intensive care. METHODS: Using a systematic approach to model development and optimization, we trained and compared various types of machine learning models, including logistic regression, neural networks, support vector machines, random forests, and gradient boosting. To evaluate the developed models, we performed a retrospective evaluation on demographic, clinical, and blood analysis data from a cohort of 5644 patients. In addition, we determined which clinical features were predictive to what degree for each of the aforementioned clinical tasks using causal explanations. RESULTS: Our experimental results indicate that our predictive models identified patients that test positive for SARS-CoV-2 a priori at a sensitivity of 75% (95% CI 67%-81%) and a specificity of 49% (95% CI 46%-51%), patients who are SARS-CoV-2 positive that require hospitalization with 0.92 area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC; 95% CI 0.81-0.98), and patients who are SARS-CoV-2 positive that require critical care with 0.98 AUC (95% CI 0.95-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that predictive models trained on routinely collected clinical data could be used to predict clinical pathways for COVID-19 and, therefore, help inform care and prioritize resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7541040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75410402020-10-20 Clinical Predictive Models for COVID-19: Systematic Study Schwab, Patrick DuMont Schütte, August Dietz, Benedikt Bauer, Stefan J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is a rapidly emerging respiratory disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. Due to the rapid human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2, many health care systems are at risk of exceeding their health care capacities, in particular in terms of SARS-CoV-2 tests, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) beds, and mechanical ventilators. Predictive algorithms could potentially ease the strain on health care systems by identifying those who are most likely to receive a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, be hospitalized, or admitted to the ICU. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to develop, study, and evaluate clinical predictive models that estimate, using machine learning and based on routinely collected clinical data, which patients are likely to receive a positive SARS-CoV-2 test or require hospitalization or intensive care. METHODS: Using a systematic approach to model development and optimization, we trained and compared various types of machine learning models, including logistic regression, neural networks, support vector machines, random forests, and gradient boosting. To evaluate the developed models, we performed a retrospective evaluation on demographic, clinical, and blood analysis data from a cohort of 5644 patients. In addition, we determined which clinical features were predictive to what degree for each of the aforementioned clinical tasks using causal explanations. RESULTS: Our experimental results indicate that our predictive models identified patients that test positive for SARS-CoV-2 a priori at a sensitivity of 75% (95% CI 67%-81%) and a specificity of 49% (95% CI 46%-51%), patients who are SARS-CoV-2 positive that require hospitalization with 0.92 area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC; 95% CI 0.81-0.98), and patients who are SARS-CoV-2 positive that require critical care with 0.98 AUC (95% CI 0.95-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that predictive models trained on routinely collected clinical data could be used to predict clinical pathways for COVID-19 and, therefore, help inform care and prioritize resources. JMIR Publications 2020-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7541040/ /pubmed/32976111 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/21439 Text en ©Patrick Schwab, August DuMont Schütte, Benedikt Dietz, Stefan Bauer. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 06.10.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Schwab, Patrick DuMont Schütte, August Dietz, Benedikt Bauer, Stefan Clinical Predictive Models for COVID-19: Systematic Study |
title | Clinical Predictive Models for COVID-19: Systematic Study |
title_full | Clinical Predictive Models for COVID-19: Systematic Study |
title_fullStr | Clinical Predictive Models for COVID-19: Systematic Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Predictive Models for COVID-19: Systematic Study |
title_short | Clinical Predictive Models for COVID-19: Systematic Study |
title_sort | clinical predictive models for covid-19: systematic study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7541040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32976111 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/21439 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwabpatrick clinicalpredictivemodelsforcovid19systematicstudy AT dumontschutteaugust clinicalpredictivemodelsforcovid19systematicstudy AT dietzbenedikt clinicalpredictivemodelsforcovid19systematicstudy AT bauerstefan clinicalpredictivemodelsforcovid19systematicstudy |