Cargando…
Factors Associated With Delayed Contraceptive Implant Removal in Ethiopia
BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Government of Ethiopia initiated the implant scale-up initiative, which expanded contraceptive access by training health extension workers (HEWs) to insert single-rod etonogestrel contraceptive implants (Implanon) at rural health posts. Removals were provided by referrals to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Global Health: Science and Practice
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7541119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33008846 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00135 |
_version_ | 1783591340025577472 |
---|---|
author | Costenbader, Elizabeth Cartwright, Alice F. McDowell, Misti Assefa, Berhane Tejeji, Meza Yirga Tenaw, Eskindir |
author_facet | Costenbader, Elizabeth Cartwright, Alice F. McDowell, Misti Assefa, Berhane Tejeji, Meza Yirga Tenaw, Eskindir |
author_sort | Costenbader, Elizabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Government of Ethiopia initiated the implant scale-up initiative, which expanded contraceptive access by training health extension workers (HEWs) to insert single-rod etonogestrel contraceptive implants (Implanon) at rural health posts. Removals were provided by referrals to higher levels of the health system. However, little was known about whether women were getting their implants removed at the recommended 3-year postinsertion date or what barriers they faced to removal. METHODS: Between June and July 2016, 1,860 Ethiopian women, who had a 1-rod etonogestrel implant inserted by either an HEW or another health care provider between 3 and 6 years prior, were surveyed. We describe the characteristics of the sample and use multivariable logistic regression to predict factors associated with keeping implants inserted beyond 3 years. RESULTS: Women who had received their implants from HEWs were significantly more likely to report keeping them inserted for more than 3 years (adjusted odds ratio=2.50; 95% confidence interval=1.19, 5.24), compared with those who got their implant from another health care provider. Women who reported distance to the facility or transportation as a barrier were also significantly more likely to keep their implant for more than 3 years. Married and educated women were less likely to keep their implants for an extended duration. Among women who had their implant for 3 years or less, women who had had it inserted by an HEW were significantly more likely to report that the provider was unable or refused to provide removal as a barrier. DISCUSSION: Efforts to expand lower level and community-based access to contraceptive implants that do not ensure reliable access to removals at the same level as insertions may lead to women using implants beyond the recommended duration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7541119 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Global Health: Science and Practice |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75411192020-10-14 Factors Associated With Delayed Contraceptive Implant Removal in Ethiopia Costenbader, Elizabeth Cartwright, Alice F. McDowell, Misti Assefa, Berhane Tejeji, Meza Yirga Tenaw, Eskindir Glob Health Sci Pract Original Article BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Government of Ethiopia initiated the implant scale-up initiative, which expanded contraceptive access by training health extension workers (HEWs) to insert single-rod etonogestrel contraceptive implants (Implanon) at rural health posts. Removals were provided by referrals to higher levels of the health system. However, little was known about whether women were getting their implants removed at the recommended 3-year postinsertion date or what barriers they faced to removal. METHODS: Between June and July 2016, 1,860 Ethiopian women, who had a 1-rod etonogestrel implant inserted by either an HEW or another health care provider between 3 and 6 years prior, were surveyed. We describe the characteristics of the sample and use multivariable logistic regression to predict factors associated with keeping implants inserted beyond 3 years. RESULTS: Women who had received their implants from HEWs were significantly more likely to report keeping them inserted for more than 3 years (adjusted odds ratio=2.50; 95% confidence interval=1.19, 5.24), compared with those who got their implant from another health care provider. Women who reported distance to the facility or transportation as a barrier were also significantly more likely to keep their implant for more than 3 years. Married and educated women were less likely to keep their implants for an extended duration. Among women who had their implant for 3 years or less, women who had had it inserted by an HEW were significantly more likely to report that the provider was unable or refused to provide removal as a barrier. DISCUSSION: Efforts to expand lower level and community-based access to contraceptive implants that do not ensure reliable access to removals at the same level as insertions may lead to women using implants beyond the recommended duration. Global Health: Science and Practice 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7541119/ /pubmed/33008846 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00135 Text en © Costenbader et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00135 |
spellingShingle | Original Article Costenbader, Elizabeth Cartwright, Alice F. McDowell, Misti Assefa, Berhane Tejeji, Meza Yirga Tenaw, Eskindir Factors Associated With Delayed Contraceptive Implant Removal in Ethiopia |
title | Factors Associated With Delayed Contraceptive Implant Removal in Ethiopia |
title_full | Factors Associated With Delayed Contraceptive Implant Removal in Ethiopia |
title_fullStr | Factors Associated With Delayed Contraceptive Implant Removal in Ethiopia |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors Associated With Delayed Contraceptive Implant Removal in Ethiopia |
title_short | Factors Associated With Delayed Contraceptive Implant Removal in Ethiopia |
title_sort | factors associated with delayed contraceptive implant removal in ethiopia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7541119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33008846 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00135 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT costenbaderelizabeth factorsassociatedwithdelayedcontraceptiveimplantremovalinethiopia AT cartwrightalicef factorsassociatedwithdelayedcontraceptiveimplantremovalinethiopia AT mcdowellmisti factorsassociatedwithdelayedcontraceptiveimplantremovalinethiopia AT assefaberhane factorsassociatedwithdelayedcontraceptiveimplantremovalinethiopia AT tejejimezayirga factorsassociatedwithdelayedcontraceptiveimplantremovalinethiopia AT tenaweskindir factorsassociatedwithdelayedcontraceptiveimplantremovalinethiopia |