Cargando…

Factors Associated With Delayed Contraceptive Implant Removal in Ethiopia

BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Government of Ethiopia initiated the implant scale-up initiative, which expanded contraceptive access by training health extension workers (HEWs) to insert single-rod etonogestrel contraceptive implants (Implanon) at rural health posts. Removals were provided by referrals to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Costenbader, Elizabeth, Cartwright, Alice F., McDowell, Misti, Assefa, Berhane, Tejeji, Meza Yirga, Tenaw, Eskindir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Global Health: Science and Practice 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7541119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33008846
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00135
_version_ 1783591340025577472
author Costenbader, Elizabeth
Cartwright, Alice F.
McDowell, Misti
Assefa, Berhane
Tejeji, Meza Yirga
Tenaw, Eskindir
author_facet Costenbader, Elizabeth
Cartwright, Alice F.
McDowell, Misti
Assefa, Berhane
Tejeji, Meza Yirga
Tenaw, Eskindir
author_sort Costenbader, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Government of Ethiopia initiated the implant scale-up initiative, which expanded contraceptive access by training health extension workers (HEWs) to insert single-rod etonogestrel contraceptive implants (Implanon) at rural health posts. Removals were provided by referrals to higher levels of the health system. However, little was known about whether women were getting their implants removed at the recommended 3-year postinsertion date or what barriers they faced to removal. METHODS: Between June and July 2016, 1,860 Ethiopian women, who had a 1-rod etonogestrel implant inserted by either an HEW or another health care provider between 3 and 6 years prior, were surveyed. We describe the characteristics of the sample and use multivariable logistic regression to predict factors associated with keeping implants inserted beyond 3 years. RESULTS: Women who had received their implants from HEWs were significantly more likely to report keeping them inserted for more than 3 years (adjusted odds ratio=2.50; 95% confidence interval=1.19, 5.24), compared with those who got their implant from another health care provider. Women who reported distance to the facility or transportation as a barrier were also significantly more likely to keep their implant for more than 3 years. Married and educated women were less likely to keep their implants for an extended duration. Among women who had their implant for 3 years or less, women who had had it inserted by an HEW were significantly more likely to report that the provider was unable or refused to provide removal as a barrier. DISCUSSION: Efforts to expand lower level and community-based access to contraceptive implants that do not ensure reliable access to removals at the same level as insertions may lead to women using implants beyond the recommended duration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7541119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Global Health: Science and Practice
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75411192020-10-14 Factors Associated With Delayed Contraceptive Implant Removal in Ethiopia Costenbader, Elizabeth Cartwright, Alice F. McDowell, Misti Assefa, Berhane Tejeji, Meza Yirga Tenaw, Eskindir Glob Health Sci Pract Original Article BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Government of Ethiopia initiated the implant scale-up initiative, which expanded contraceptive access by training health extension workers (HEWs) to insert single-rod etonogestrel contraceptive implants (Implanon) at rural health posts. Removals were provided by referrals to higher levels of the health system. However, little was known about whether women were getting their implants removed at the recommended 3-year postinsertion date or what barriers they faced to removal. METHODS: Between June and July 2016, 1,860 Ethiopian women, who had a 1-rod etonogestrel implant inserted by either an HEW or another health care provider between 3 and 6 years prior, were surveyed. We describe the characteristics of the sample and use multivariable logistic regression to predict factors associated with keeping implants inserted beyond 3 years. RESULTS: Women who had received their implants from HEWs were significantly more likely to report keeping them inserted for more than 3 years (adjusted odds ratio=2.50; 95% confidence interval=1.19, 5.24), compared with those who got their implant from another health care provider. Women who reported distance to the facility or transportation as a barrier were also significantly more likely to keep their implant for more than 3 years. Married and educated women were less likely to keep their implants for an extended duration. Among women who had their implant for 3 years or less, women who had had it inserted by an HEW were significantly more likely to report that the provider was unable or refused to provide removal as a barrier. DISCUSSION: Efforts to expand lower level and community-based access to contraceptive implants that do not ensure reliable access to removals at the same level as insertions may lead to women using implants beyond the recommended duration. Global Health: Science and Practice 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7541119/ /pubmed/33008846 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00135 Text en © Costenbader et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00135
spellingShingle Original Article
Costenbader, Elizabeth
Cartwright, Alice F.
McDowell, Misti
Assefa, Berhane
Tejeji, Meza Yirga
Tenaw, Eskindir
Factors Associated With Delayed Contraceptive Implant Removal in Ethiopia
title Factors Associated With Delayed Contraceptive Implant Removal in Ethiopia
title_full Factors Associated With Delayed Contraceptive Implant Removal in Ethiopia
title_fullStr Factors Associated With Delayed Contraceptive Implant Removal in Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Factors Associated With Delayed Contraceptive Implant Removal in Ethiopia
title_short Factors Associated With Delayed Contraceptive Implant Removal in Ethiopia
title_sort factors associated with delayed contraceptive implant removal in ethiopia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7541119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33008846
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00135
work_keys_str_mv AT costenbaderelizabeth factorsassociatedwithdelayedcontraceptiveimplantremovalinethiopia
AT cartwrightalicef factorsassociatedwithdelayedcontraceptiveimplantremovalinethiopia
AT mcdowellmisti factorsassociatedwithdelayedcontraceptiveimplantremovalinethiopia
AT assefaberhane factorsassociatedwithdelayedcontraceptiveimplantremovalinethiopia
AT tejejimezayirga factorsassociatedwithdelayedcontraceptiveimplantremovalinethiopia
AT tenaweskindir factorsassociatedwithdelayedcontraceptiveimplantremovalinethiopia