Cargando…

Remote skin self‐examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners: A randomized trial and comparison with in‐person training

BACKGROUND: Compared with other cancers, melanoma has the longest delays measured as the median time to patient presentation for care from symptom onset. Time to presentation for care is a key determinant of outcomes, including disease stage, prognosis, and treatment. METHODS: Melanoma survivors wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robinson, June K., Reavy, Racheal, Mallett, Kimberly A., Turrisi, Rob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7541148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32761987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3299
_version_ 1783591346872778752
author Robinson, June K.
Reavy, Racheal
Mallett, Kimberly A.
Turrisi, Rob
author_facet Robinson, June K.
Reavy, Racheal
Mallett, Kimberly A.
Turrisi, Rob
author_sort Robinson, June K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Compared with other cancers, melanoma has the longest delays measured as the median time to patient presentation for care from symptom onset. Time to presentation for care is a key determinant of outcomes, including disease stage, prognosis, and treatment. METHODS: Melanoma survivors with localized disease and their skin check partners enrolled in two sequential randomized control trials of skin self‐examination (SSE) training. In Phase 1, the pair read a workbook in the office and had quarterly total body skin examinations with a study dermatologist. In Phase 2, materials were mailed to pairs, whose surveillance was with a community physician. SSE knowledge, performance (frequency and extent), and identification of concerning moles were compared between phases. RESULTS: Among 341 patients, 197 received the workbook and the others were controls. Knowledge in performing SSE was higher for the workbook relative to controls in both phases. The SSE frequency ranged from 2.38 to 5.97 times in 9 months. Patients randomized to the workbook in both phases performed significantly more SSE than controls at 9 months (P < .05). In both phases, trained survivors performed significantly more SSEs on the scalp than controls at 9 and 18 months (P < .05). Phase 1 survivors performed significantly more SSEs on the abdomen, buttocks, and soles of the feet than controls, but this did not occur in Phase 2. Finally, in both phases, survivors trained with the workbook resulted in greater detection of suspicious lesions and melanomas. CONCLUSIONS: These findings justify the benefits of remote SSE training for patients as an adjunct to provider‐administered screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7541148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75411482020-10-09 Remote skin self‐examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners: A randomized trial and comparison with in‐person training Robinson, June K. Reavy, Racheal Mallett, Kimberly A. Turrisi, Rob Cancer Med Cancer Prevention BACKGROUND: Compared with other cancers, melanoma has the longest delays measured as the median time to patient presentation for care from symptom onset. Time to presentation for care is a key determinant of outcomes, including disease stage, prognosis, and treatment. METHODS: Melanoma survivors with localized disease and their skin check partners enrolled in two sequential randomized control trials of skin self‐examination (SSE) training. In Phase 1, the pair read a workbook in the office and had quarterly total body skin examinations with a study dermatologist. In Phase 2, materials were mailed to pairs, whose surveillance was with a community physician. SSE knowledge, performance (frequency and extent), and identification of concerning moles were compared between phases. RESULTS: Among 341 patients, 197 received the workbook and the others were controls. Knowledge in performing SSE was higher for the workbook relative to controls in both phases. The SSE frequency ranged from 2.38 to 5.97 times in 9 months. Patients randomized to the workbook in both phases performed significantly more SSE than controls at 9 months (P < .05). In both phases, trained survivors performed significantly more SSEs on the scalp than controls at 9 and 18 months (P < .05). Phase 1 survivors performed significantly more SSEs on the abdomen, buttocks, and soles of the feet than controls, but this did not occur in Phase 2. Finally, in both phases, survivors trained with the workbook resulted in greater detection of suspicious lesions and melanomas. CONCLUSIONS: These findings justify the benefits of remote SSE training for patients as an adjunct to provider‐administered screening. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7541148/ /pubmed/32761987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3299 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cancer Prevention
Robinson, June K.
Reavy, Racheal
Mallett, Kimberly A.
Turrisi, Rob
Remote skin self‐examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners: A randomized trial and comparison with in‐person training
title Remote skin self‐examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners: A randomized trial and comparison with in‐person training
title_full Remote skin self‐examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners: A randomized trial and comparison with in‐person training
title_fullStr Remote skin self‐examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners: A randomized trial and comparison with in‐person training
title_full_unstemmed Remote skin self‐examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners: A randomized trial and comparison with in‐person training
title_short Remote skin self‐examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners: A randomized trial and comparison with in‐person training
title_sort remote skin self‐examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners: a randomized trial and comparison with in‐person training
topic Cancer Prevention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7541148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32761987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3299
work_keys_str_mv AT robinsonjunek remoteskinselfexaminationtrainingofmelanomasurvivorsandtheirskincheckpartnersarandomizedtrialandcomparisonwithinpersontraining
AT reavyracheal remoteskinselfexaminationtrainingofmelanomasurvivorsandtheirskincheckpartnersarandomizedtrialandcomparisonwithinpersontraining
AT mallettkimberlya remoteskinselfexaminationtrainingofmelanomasurvivorsandtheirskincheckpartnersarandomizedtrialandcomparisonwithinpersontraining
AT turrisirob remoteskinselfexaminationtrainingofmelanomasurvivorsandtheirskincheckpartnersarandomizedtrialandcomparisonwithinpersontraining