Cargando…

Preliminary assessment of two novel mechanical colonoscopic polypectomy simulators: Description, evaluation and validation

Background and study aims  Colonoscopic polypectomy is an essential endoscopic skill. The simulators available for training are limited and based on raw porcine colons. Animal intestines are inconvenient and offer limited advantages for polypectomy training. These limitations are avoided by two nove...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frimberger, Eckart, Klare, Peter, Haller, Bernhard, Elnegouly, Mayada, Bajbouj, Monther, Schmid, Roland M., von Delius, Stefan, Abdelhafez, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7541194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33043124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1186-8420
_version_ 1783591356862562304
author Frimberger, Eckart
Klare, Peter
Haller, Bernhard
Elnegouly, Mayada
Bajbouj, Monther
Schmid, Roland M.
von Delius, Stefan
Abdelhafez, Mohamed
author_facet Frimberger, Eckart
Klare, Peter
Haller, Bernhard
Elnegouly, Mayada
Bajbouj, Monther
Schmid, Roland M.
von Delius, Stefan
Abdelhafez, Mohamed
author_sort Frimberger, Eckart
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Colonoscopic polypectomy is an essential endoscopic skill. The simulators available for training are limited and based on raw porcine colons. Animal intestines are inconvenient and offer limited advantages for polypectomy training. These limitations are avoided by two novel mechanical simulators — the magnetic system based simulator (MSPS) and the simulator for polypectomy with high frequency current (HFPS) — described here. They are equipped to demonstrate self-repair of polyps after making a cut and hybrid polyps. The aim of this study was to describe and establish face, content, and construct validity of the two simulators and to assess their perceived utility as training and assessment tools. Methods  Ten novice, seven intermediate, and 10 advanced endoscopists participated in this study. Each one performed two polypectomies in MSPS and then one polypectomy and polyp retrieval in HFPS. The median times were compared among the three groups to preliminarily assess construct validity as a primary outcome. To establish face validity, the novices and intermediates completed a questionnaire about the credibility of each simulator after finishing the tasks. For content validity, the experts completed a questionnaire grading different aspects of the simulators’ realism and their usefulness for training. Results  All 27 participants completed the modules. Median times needed to complete the tasks in both simulators differed significantly between the participants with different levels of experience ( P  < 0.05). Both MSPS and HFPS received favorable scores regarding face and content validity. No technical problems were encountered. Conclusion  This study provides preliminary validation for MSPS and HFPS as useful training tools in a preclinical setting as well as during colonoscopy training. Moreover, we demonstrated the construct validity of both simulators, which confirms their use as a skill assessment tool during a colonoscopy training program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7541194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75411942020-10-09 Preliminary assessment of two novel mechanical colonoscopic polypectomy simulators: Description, evaluation and validation Frimberger, Eckart Klare, Peter Haller, Bernhard Elnegouly, Mayada Bajbouj, Monther Schmid, Roland M. von Delius, Stefan Abdelhafez, Mohamed Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Colonoscopic polypectomy is an essential endoscopic skill. The simulators available for training are limited and based on raw porcine colons. Animal intestines are inconvenient and offer limited advantages for polypectomy training. These limitations are avoided by two novel mechanical simulators — the magnetic system based simulator (MSPS) and the simulator for polypectomy with high frequency current (HFPS) — described here. They are equipped to demonstrate self-repair of polyps after making a cut and hybrid polyps. The aim of this study was to describe and establish face, content, and construct validity of the two simulators and to assess their perceived utility as training and assessment tools. Methods  Ten novice, seven intermediate, and 10 advanced endoscopists participated in this study. Each one performed two polypectomies in MSPS and then one polypectomy and polyp retrieval in HFPS. The median times were compared among the three groups to preliminarily assess construct validity as a primary outcome. To establish face validity, the novices and intermediates completed a questionnaire about the credibility of each simulator after finishing the tasks. For content validity, the experts completed a questionnaire grading different aspects of the simulators’ realism and their usefulness for training. Results  All 27 participants completed the modules. Median times needed to complete the tasks in both simulators differed significantly between the participants with different levels of experience ( P  < 0.05). Both MSPS and HFPS received favorable scores regarding face and content validity. No technical problems were encountered. Conclusion  This study provides preliminary validation for MSPS and HFPS as useful training tools in a preclinical setting as well as during colonoscopy training. Moreover, we demonstrated the construct validity of both simulators, which confirms their use as a skill assessment tool during a colonoscopy training program. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020-10 2020-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7541194/ /pubmed/33043124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1186-8420 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Frimberger, Eckart
Klare, Peter
Haller, Bernhard
Elnegouly, Mayada
Bajbouj, Monther
Schmid, Roland M.
von Delius, Stefan
Abdelhafez, Mohamed
Preliminary assessment of two novel mechanical colonoscopic polypectomy simulators: Description, evaluation and validation
title Preliminary assessment of two novel mechanical colonoscopic polypectomy simulators: Description, evaluation and validation
title_full Preliminary assessment of two novel mechanical colonoscopic polypectomy simulators: Description, evaluation and validation
title_fullStr Preliminary assessment of two novel mechanical colonoscopic polypectomy simulators: Description, evaluation and validation
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary assessment of two novel mechanical colonoscopic polypectomy simulators: Description, evaluation and validation
title_short Preliminary assessment of two novel mechanical colonoscopic polypectomy simulators: Description, evaluation and validation
title_sort preliminary assessment of two novel mechanical colonoscopic polypectomy simulators: description, evaluation and validation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7541194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33043124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1186-8420
work_keys_str_mv AT frimbergereckart preliminaryassessmentoftwonovelmechanicalcolonoscopicpolypectomysimulatorsdescriptionevaluationandvalidation
AT klarepeter preliminaryassessmentoftwonovelmechanicalcolonoscopicpolypectomysimulatorsdescriptionevaluationandvalidation
AT hallerbernhard preliminaryassessmentoftwonovelmechanicalcolonoscopicpolypectomysimulatorsdescriptionevaluationandvalidation
AT elnegoulymayada preliminaryassessmentoftwonovelmechanicalcolonoscopicpolypectomysimulatorsdescriptionevaluationandvalidation
AT bajboujmonther preliminaryassessmentoftwonovelmechanicalcolonoscopicpolypectomysimulatorsdescriptionevaluationandvalidation
AT schmidrolandm preliminaryassessmentoftwonovelmechanicalcolonoscopicpolypectomysimulatorsdescriptionevaluationandvalidation
AT vondeliusstefan preliminaryassessmentoftwonovelmechanicalcolonoscopicpolypectomysimulatorsdescriptionevaluationandvalidation
AT abdelhafezmohamed preliminaryassessmentoftwonovelmechanicalcolonoscopicpolypectomysimulatorsdescriptionevaluationandvalidation