Cargando…
The comparison of MRN, electrophysiology and progression among typical CIDP and atypical CIDP subtypes
We aimed to compare the electrophysiology and magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) results of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) subtypes and to explore the progression from atypical CIDP to typical CIDP. We collected the medical records of 45 CIDP patients to analyse t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7541655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33028841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73104-1 |
_version_ | 1783591417564626944 |
---|---|
author | Feng, Yuan Zhang, Yu Su, Xiaoyun Zheng, Chuansheng Lu, Zuneng |
author_facet | Feng, Yuan Zhang, Yu Su, Xiaoyun Zheng, Chuansheng Lu, Zuneng |
author_sort | Feng, Yuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | We aimed to compare the electrophysiology and magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) results of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) subtypes and to explore the progression from atypical CIDP to typical CIDP. We collected the medical records of 45 CIDP patients to analyse the rate of progression from atypical CIDP to typical CIDP subtypes. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein (p = 0.024) and overall disability sum score (ODSS) (p = 0.000) differed among patients with typical CIDP, distal acquired demyelinating symmetric neuropathy (DADS) and Lewis-Sumner syndrome (LSS). The compound motor action potential (CMAP) of typical CIDP was lower than that of the other subtypes (p = 0.016, p = 0.022 and p = 0.012). The cross-sectional area (CSA) of nerve roots in typical CIDP was significantly thicker than that of nerve roots in DADS and LSS. There were fewer DADS and LSS patients who progressed to typical CIDP than those who progressed to pure motor and pure sensory CIDP (p = 0.000), and the progression from pure motor to typical CIDP required a significantly longer time than the progression from pure sensory to typical CIDP (p = 0.007). Typical CIDP was more severe than the other subtypes not only in terms of clinical and electrophysiology factors but also in terms of MRN factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7541655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75416552020-10-08 The comparison of MRN, electrophysiology and progression among typical CIDP and atypical CIDP subtypes Feng, Yuan Zhang, Yu Su, Xiaoyun Zheng, Chuansheng Lu, Zuneng Sci Rep Article We aimed to compare the electrophysiology and magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) results of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) subtypes and to explore the progression from atypical CIDP to typical CIDP. We collected the medical records of 45 CIDP patients to analyse the rate of progression from atypical CIDP to typical CIDP subtypes. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein (p = 0.024) and overall disability sum score (ODSS) (p = 0.000) differed among patients with typical CIDP, distal acquired demyelinating symmetric neuropathy (DADS) and Lewis-Sumner syndrome (LSS). The compound motor action potential (CMAP) of typical CIDP was lower than that of the other subtypes (p = 0.016, p = 0.022 and p = 0.012). The cross-sectional area (CSA) of nerve roots in typical CIDP was significantly thicker than that of nerve roots in DADS and LSS. There were fewer DADS and LSS patients who progressed to typical CIDP than those who progressed to pure motor and pure sensory CIDP (p = 0.000), and the progression from pure motor to typical CIDP required a significantly longer time than the progression from pure sensory to typical CIDP (p = 0.007). Typical CIDP was more severe than the other subtypes not only in terms of clinical and electrophysiology factors but also in terms of MRN factors. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7541655/ /pubmed/33028841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73104-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Feng, Yuan Zhang, Yu Su, Xiaoyun Zheng, Chuansheng Lu, Zuneng The comparison of MRN, electrophysiology and progression among typical CIDP and atypical CIDP subtypes |
title | The comparison of MRN, electrophysiology and progression among typical CIDP and atypical CIDP subtypes |
title_full | The comparison of MRN, electrophysiology and progression among typical CIDP and atypical CIDP subtypes |
title_fullStr | The comparison of MRN, electrophysiology and progression among typical CIDP and atypical CIDP subtypes |
title_full_unstemmed | The comparison of MRN, electrophysiology and progression among typical CIDP and atypical CIDP subtypes |
title_short | The comparison of MRN, electrophysiology and progression among typical CIDP and atypical CIDP subtypes |
title_sort | comparison of mrn, electrophysiology and progression among typical cidp and atypical cidp subtypes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7541655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33028841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73104-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fengyuan thecomparisonofmrnelectrophysiologyandprogressionamongtypicalcidpandatypicalcidpsubtypes AT zhangyu thecomparisonofmrnelectrophysiologyandprogressionamongtypicalcidpandatypicalcidpsubtypes AT suxiaoyun thecomparisonofmrnelectrophysiologyandprogressionamongtypicalcidpandatypicalcidpsubtypes AT zhengchuansheng thecomparisonofmrnelectrophysiologyandprogressionamongtypicalcidpandatypicalcidpsubtypes AT luzuneng thecomparisonofmrnelectrophysiologyandprogressionamongtypicalcidpandatypicalcidpsubtypes AT fengyuan comparisonofmrnelectrophysiologyandprogressionamongtypicalcidpandatypicalcidpsubtypes AT zhangyu comparisonofmrnelectrophysiologyandprogressionamongtypicalcidpandatypicalcidpsubtypes AT suxiaoyun comparisonofmrnelectrophysiologyandprogressionamongtypicalcidpandatypicalcidpsubtypes AT zhengchuansheng comparisonofmrnelectrophysiologyandprogressionamongtypicalcidpandatypicalcidpsubtypes AT luzuneng comparisonofmrnelectrophysiologyandprogressionamongtypicalcidpandatypicalcidpsubtypes |