Cargando…

Complexity Thinking as a Tool to Understand the Didactics of Psychology

The need to establish a research field within psychology didactics at secondary level has recently been voiced by several researchers internationally. An analysis of a Swedish case coming out of secondary level education in psychology presented here provides an illustration that complexity thinking—...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harmat, László, Herbert, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7541894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33071860
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.542446
_version_ 1783591445710503936
author Harmat, László
Herbert, Anna
author_facet Harmat, László
Herbert, Anna
author_sort Harmat, László
collection PubMed
description The need to establish a research field within psychology didactics at secondary level has recently been voiced by several researchers internationally. An analysis of a Swedish case coming out of secondary level education in psychology presented here provides an illustration that complexity thinking—derived from complexity theory—is uniquely placed to consider and indicate possible solutions to challenges, described by researchers as central to the foundation of a new field. Subject matter didactics is defined for the purpose of this paper as a combination of general didactics and subject matter content, and considering the international nature of research traditions coming out of psychology, the implications of the results presented here cannot be regarded as limited solely to national concerns. An online survey was sent to secondary schools in Sweden. Discussions and lectures along with teaching to the book—alternatively used as inspiration—emerged as central from the thematic analysis of the results, providing the first mapping of teaching practices secondary level psychology in Sweden. An analysis, founded on complexity thinking—combined with a model enabling a delimitation of the scope of study—focused on time use and the importance placed on self-knowledge, along with the transformation of theory into practice. The former pointed to a teacher-centered nested subsystem (e.g., asymmetric relations between teachers and students), whereas the latter pointed to student-centered nested subsystems coming out of embodied knowledge (e.g., students as node) where psychological perspectives are learnt through self-reflection, case studies, and everyday life experiences (turning theory to practice), implying a holistic approach. The analysis applied to the Swedish case provides an illustration of how complexity theory has the potential to address challenges at the micro and the macro levels to the establishment of a new research field in psychology didactics and to indicate possible solutions (drawing among other things upon teaching experiences coming out of the Swedish case study). Psychology’s high relevance to everyday life, multi-causality, perspective pluralism, dynamic systems character, and scientific character make complexity thinking a relevant approach in the consideration of challenges to the establishment of a research field in didactics of psychology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7541894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75418942020-10-17 Complexity Thinking as a Tool to Understand the Didactics of Psychology Harmat, László Herbert, Anna Front Psychol Psychology The need to establish a research field within psychology didactics at secondary level has recently been voiced by several researchers internationally. An analysis of a Swedish case coming out of secondary level education in psychology presented here provides an illustration that complexity thinking—derived from complexity theory—is uniquely placed to consider and indicate possible solutions to challenges, described by researchers as central to the foundation of a new field. Subject matter didactics is defined for the purpose of this paper as a combination of general didactics and subject matter content, and considering the international nature of research traditions coming out of psychology, the implications of the results presented here cannot be regarded as limited solely to national concerns. An online survey was sent to secondary schools in Sweden. Discussions and lectures along with teaching to the book—alternatively used as inspiration—emerged as central from the thematic analysis of the results, providing the first mapping of teaching practices secondary level psychology in Sweden. An analysis, founded on complexity thinking—combined with a model enabling a delimitation of the scope of study—focused on time use and the importance placed on self-knowledge, along with the transformation of theory into practice. The former pointed to a teacher-centered nested subsystem (e.g., asymmetric relations between teachers and students), whereas the latter pointed to student-centered nested subsystems coming out of embodied knowledge (e.g., students as node) where psychological perspectives are learnt through self-reflection, case studies, and everyday life experiences (turning theory to practice), implying a holistic approach. The analysis applied to the Swedish case provides an illustration of how complexity theory has the potential to address challenges at the micro and the macro levels to the establishment of a new research field in psychology didactics and to indicate possible solutions (drawing among other things upon teaching experiences coming out of the Swedish case study). Psychology’s high relevance to everyday life, multi-causality, perspective pluralism, dynamic systems character, and scientific character make complexity thinking a relevant approach in the consideration of challenges to the establishment of a research field in didactics of psychology. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7541894/ /pubmed/33071860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.542446 Text en Copyright © 2020 Harmat and Herbert. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Harmat, László
Herbert, Anna
Complexity Thinking as a Tool to Understand the Didactics of Psychology
title Complexity Thinking as a Tool to Understand the Didactics of Psychology
title_full Complexity Thinking as a Tool to Understand the Didactics of Psychology
title_fullStr Complexity Thinking as a Tool to Understand the Didactics of Psychology
title_full_unstemmed Complexity Thinking as a Tool to Understand the Didactics of Psychology
title_short Complexity Thinking as a Tool to Understand the Didactics of Psychology
title_sort complexity thinking as a tool to understand the didactics of psychology
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7541894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33071860
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.542446
work_keys_str_mv AT harmatlaszlo complexitythinkingasatooltounderstandthedidacticsofpsychology
AT herbertanna complexitythinkingasatooltounderstandthedidacticsofpsychology