Cargando…

Effects of Different Stimulation Conditions on the Stimulation Effect of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation

Balance disorders are a risk factor for falls in the elderly population. Balance control involving the complex interaction among nervous, muscular, and sensory systems should be maintained to keep an upright posture and prevent falls. Vestibular sensation is one of the main senses essential for post...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inukai, Yasuto, Miyaguchi, Shota, Saito, Miki, Otsuru, Naofumi, Onishi, Hideaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7541970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192415
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.581405
_version_ 1783591462633472000
author Inukai, Yasuto
Miyaguchi, Shota
Saito, Miki
Otsuru, Naofumi
Onishi, Hideaki
author_facet Inukai, Yasuto
Miyaguchi, Shota
Saito, Miki
Otsuru, Naofumi
Onishi, Hideaki
author_sort Inukai, Yasuto
collection PubMed
description Balance disorders are a risk factor for falls in the elderly population. Balance control involving the complex interaction among nervous, muscular, and sensory systems should be maintained to keep an upright posture and prevent falls. Vestibular sensation is one of the main senses essential for postural control. Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) is a noninvasive stimulation method for vestibular organs. Recently, it has received increasing attention for the treatment of balance disorders. However, the effect of balance disorders on stimulus effect during the implementation of nGVS remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effects of different floor surface and visual conditions on the stimulus effects of the nGVS intervention. In this study, two experiments were conducted with 24 participants (12 each for Experiments 1 and 2). In Experiment 1, nGVS (0.4 mA; 0.1–640 Hz) was performed in the open-eyes standing position on a solid surface (nGVS condition) and in the closed-eye standing position on a foam rubber (nGVS + foam rubber condition). In Experiment 2, sham stimulation was performed under the same conditions as in Experiment 1, except for nGVS. Center of pressure (COP) sway was measured in all participants with them standing with open eyes at Pre and Post-1 (immediately after the intervention) and Post-2 (10 min after the measurement of post-1). In Experiment 1, under the nGVS condition, COP sway was significantly reduced in Post-1 and Post-2 compared with Pre. However, no significant difference was observed among Pre, Post-1, and Post-2 under the nGVS + foam rubber condition. Furthermore, the intervention effect was significantly greater in the nGVS condition than in the nGVS + foam rubber condition. In contrast, in Experiment 2, the COP sway did not significantly differ among Pre, Post-1, and Post-2 under either condition. Based on the results of this study, nGVS was found to be effective with open-eyes standing on a solid surface.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7541970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75419702020-11-13 Effects of Different Stimulation Conditions on the Stimulation Effect of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Inukai, Yasuto Miyaguchi, Shota Saito, Miki Otsuru, Naofumi Onishi, Hideaki Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Balance disorders are a risk factor for falls in the elderly population. Balance control involving the complex interaction among nervous, muscular, and sensory systems should be maintained to keep an upright posture and prevent falls. Vestibular sensation is one of the main senses essential for postural control. Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) is a noninvasive stimulation method for vestibular organs. Recently, it has received increasing attention for the treatment of balance disorders. However, the effect of balance disorders on stimulus effect during the implementation of nGVS remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effects of different floor surface and visual conditions on the stimulus effects of the nGVS intervention. In this study, two experiments were conducted with 24 participants (12 each for Experiments 1 and 2). In Experiment 1, nGVS (0.4 mA; 0.1–640 Hz) was performed in the open-eyes standing position on a solid surface (nGVS condition) and in the closed-eye standing position on a foam rubber (nGVS + foam rubber condition). In Experiment 2, sham stimulation was performed under the same conditions as in Experiment 1, except for nGVS. Center of pressure (COP) sway was measured in all participants with them standing with open eyes at Pre and Post-1 (immediately after the intervention) and Post-2 (10 min after the measurement of post-1). In Experiment 1, under the nGVS condition, COP sway was significantly reduced in Post-1 and Post-2 compared with Pre. However, no significant difference was observed among Pre, Post-1, and Post-2 under the nGVS + foam rubber condition. Furthermore, the intervention effect was significantly greater in the nGVS condition than in the nGVS + foam rubber condition. In contrast, in Experiment 2, the COP sway did not significantly differ among Pre, Post-1, and Post-2 under either condition. Based on the results of this study, nGVS was found to be effective with open-eyes standing on a solid surface. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7541970/ /pubmed/33192415 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.581405 Text en Copyright © 2020 Inukai, Miyaguchi, Saito, Otsuru and Onishi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Inukai, Yasuto
Miyaguchi, Shota
Saito, Miki
Otsuru, Naofumi
Onishi, Hideaki
Effects of Different Stimulation Conditions on the Stimulation Effect of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation
title Effects of Different Stimulation Conditions on the Stimulation Effect of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation
title_full Effects of Different Stimulation Conditions on the Stimulation Effect of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation
title_fullStr Effects of Different Stimulation Conditions on the Stimulation Effect of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Different Stimulation Conditions on the Stimulation Effect of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation
title_short Effects of Different Stimulation Conditions on the Stimulation Effect of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation
title_sort effects of different stimulation conditions on the stimulation effect of noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7541970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192415
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.581405
work_keys_str_mv AT inukaiyasuto effectsofdifferentstimulationconditionsonthestimulationeffectofnoisygalvanicvestibularstimulation
AT miyaguchishota effectsofdifferentstimulationconditionsonthestimulationeffectofnoisygalvanicvestibularstimulation
AT saitomiki effectsofdifferentstimulationconditionsonthestimulationeffectofnoisygalvanicvestibularstimulation
AT otsurunaofumi effectsofdifferentstimulationconditionsonthestimulationeffectofnoisygalvanicvestibularstimulation
AT onishihideaki effectsofdifferentstimulationconditionsonthestimulationeffectofnoisygalvanicvestibularstimulation