Cargando…
Extra‐pelvic endometriosis: A review
BACKGROUND: Extra‐pelvic endometriosis is a rare type of endometriosis, which occurs in a distant site from gynecological organs. The diagnosis of extra‐pelvic endometriosis can be extremely challenging and may result in a delay in diagnosis. The main objective of this review was to characterize abd...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33071634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12340 |
_version_ | 1783591472710287360 |
---|---|
author | Hirata, Tetsuya Koga, Kaori Osuga, Yutaka |
author_facet | Hirata, Tetsuya Koga, Kaori Osuga, Yutaka |
author_sort | Hirata, Tetsuya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Extra‐pelvic endometriosis is a rare type of endometriosis, which occurs in a distant site from gynecological organs. The diagnosis of extra‐pelvic endometriosis can be extremely challenging and may result in a delay in diagnosis. The main objective of this review was to characterize abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) and thoracic endometriosis (TE). METHODS: The authors performed a literature search to provide an overview of AWE and TE, which are the major types of extra‐pelvic endometriosis. MAIN FINDINGS: Abdominal wall endometriosis includes scar endometriosis secondary to the surgical wound and spontaneous AWE, most of which occur in the umbilicus or groin. Surgical treatment appeared to be effective for AWE. Case reports indicated that the diagnosis and treatment of catamenial pneumothorax or endometriosis‐related pneumothorax (CP/ERP) are challenging, and a combination of surgery and postoperative hormonal therapy is essential. Further, catamenial hemoptysis (CH) can be adequately managed by hormonal treatment, unlike CP/ERP. CONCLUSION: Evidence‐based approaches to diagnosis and treatment of extra‐pelvic endometriosis remain immature given the low prevalence and limited quality of research available in the literature. To gain a better understanding of extra‐pelvic endometriosis, it would be advisable to develop a registry involving a multidisciplinary collaboration with gynecologists, general surgeons, and thoracic surgeons. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7542014 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75420142020-10-16 Extra‐pelvic endometriosis: A review Hirata, Tetsuya Koga, Kaori Osuga, Yutaka Reprod Med Biol Mini Reviews BACKGROUND: Extra‐pelvic endometriosis is a rare type of endometriosis, which occurs in a distant site from gynecological organs. The diagnosis of extra‐pelvic endometriosis can be extremely challenging and may result in a delay in diagnosis. The main objective of this review was to characterize abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) and thoracic endometriosis (TE). METHODS: The authors performed a literature search to provide an overview of AWE and TE, which are the major types of extra‐pelvic endometriosis. MAIN FINDINGS: Abdominal wall endometriosis includes scar endometriosis secondary to the surgical wound and spontaneous AWE, most of which occur in the umbilicus or groin. Surgical treatment appeared to be effective for AWE. Case reports indicated that the diagnosis and treatment of catamenial pneumothorax or endometriosis‐related pneumothorax (CP/ERP) are challenging, and a combination of surgery and postoperative hormonal therapy is essential. Further, catamenial hemoptysis (CH) can be adequately managed by hormonal treatment, unlike CP/ERP. CONCLUSION: Evidence‐based approaches to diagnosis and treatment of extra‐pelvic endometriosis remain immature given the low prevalence and limited quality of research available in the literature. To gain a better understanding of extra‐pelvic endometriosis, it would be advisable to develop a registry involving a multidisciplinary collaboration with gynecologists, general surgeons, and thoracic surgeons. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7542014/ /pubmed/33071634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12340 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Mini Reviews Hirata, Tetsuya Koga, Kaori Osuga, Yutaka Extra‐pelvic endometriosis: A review |
title | Extra‐pelvic endometriosis: A review |
title_full | Extra‐pelvic endometriosis: A review |
title_fullStr | Extra‐pelvic endometriosis: A review |
title_full_unstemmed | Extra‐pelvic endometriosis: A review |
title_short | Extra‐pelvic endometriosis: A review |
title_sort | extra‐pelvic endometriosis: a review |
topic | Mini Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33071634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12340 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hiratatetsuya extrapelvicendometriosisareview AT kogakaori extrapelvicendometriosisareview AT osugayutaka extrapelvicendometriosisareview |