Cargando…

Contaminants and Mimickers in Cytopathology

CONTEXT: Many contaminants are routinely encountered in cytopathology practice. However, because of lack of familiarity and experience with them, many are unnoticed, neglected, or confused with other structures of major relevance. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to intentionally introduce contam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muzarath, S, Nandyal, Sonam S., Bindu, B J, Murthy, C Narayana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33088031
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOC.JOC_159_19
_version_ 1783591478560292864
author Muzarath, S
Nandyal, Sonam S.
Bindu, B J
Murthy, C Narayana
author_facet Muzarath, S
Nandyal, Sonam S.
Bindu, B J
Murthy, C Narayana
author_sort Muzarath, S
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Many contaminants are routinely encountered in cytopathology practice. However, because of lack of familiarity and experience with them, many are unnoticed, neglected, or confused with other structures of major relevance. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to intentionally introduce contaminants into the smears and to provide distinctive morphological criteria required for the microscopist to identify them confidently to avoid possible confusion. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study. METHODS AND MATERIAL: This study included smears prepared from the buccal mucosa of healthy volunteers. Common contaminants were deliberately introduced into the smears, fixed using 90% ethanol, and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin stain (H and E) and Papanicolaou stain (PAP). The study also included smears from leftover cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and wet mount preparations. The morphology of these contaminants was studied and the results were tabulated. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Nil. RESULTS: The vivid morphological appearance of these commonly encountered contaminants were described and many of these mimicked structures of major relevance. CONCLUSIONS: Contaminants and mimickers can make the evaluation of cytologic specimens challenging and may necessitate secondary review by another pathologist or further workup. Knowledge and familiarity of these commonly encountered extraneous substances will help to prevent misinterpretation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7542040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75420402020-10-20 Contaminants and Mimickers in Cytopathology Muzarath, S Nandyal, Sonam S. Bindu, B J Murthy, C Narayana J Cytol Original Article CONTEXT: Many contaminants are routinely encountered in cytopathology practice. However, because of lack of familiarity and experience with them, many are unnoticed, neglected, or confused with other structures of major relevance. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to intentionally introduce contaminants into the smears and to provide distinctive morphological criteria required for the microscopist to identify them confidently to avoid possible confusion. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study. METHODS AND MATERIAL: This study included smears prepared from the buccal mucosa of healthy volunteers. Common contaminants were deliberately introduced into the smears, fixed using 90% ethanol, and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin stain (H and E) and Papanicolaou stain (PAP). The study also included smears from leftover cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and wet mount preparations. The morphology of these contaminants was studied and the results were tabulated. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Nil. RESULTS: The vivid morphological appearance of these commonly encountered contaminants were described and many of these mimicked structures of major relevance. CONCLUSIONS: Contaminants and mimickers can make the evaluation of cytologic specimens challenging and may necessitate secondary review by another pathologist or further workup. Knowledge and familiarity of these commonly encountered extraneous substances will help to prevent misinterpretation. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7542040/ /pubmed/33088031 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOC.JOC_159_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Cytology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Muzarath, S
Nandyal, Sonam S.
Bindu, B J
Murthy, C Narayana
Contaminants and Mimickers in Cytopathology
title Contaminants and Mimickers in Cytopathology
title_full Contaminants and Mimickers in Cytopathology
title_fullStr Contaminants and Mimickers in Cytopathology
title_full_unstemmed Contaminants and Mimickers in Cytopathology
title_short Contaminants and Mimickers in Cytopathology
title_sort contaminants and mimickers in cytopathology
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33088031
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOC.JOC_159_19
work_keys_str_mv AT muzaraths contaminantsandmimickersincytopathology
AT nandyalsonams contaminantsandmimickersincytopathology
AT bindubj contaminantsandmimickersincytopathology
AT murthycnarayana contaminantsandmimickersincytopathology