Cargando…
A comparative evaluation of cyclic fatigue resistance of FlexiCON (Edge Endo) files in rotary versus reciprocating motion at various curvatures – An in vitro study
AIM: The aim of the study to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of FlexiCON (Edge Endo) files in rotary versus reciprocating motion in coronal, middle, and apical curvature of the simulated artificial canal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 36 new files, 25 mm length of ISO size 25 at the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33088064 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_203_19 |
_version_ | 1783591486212800512 |
---|---|
author | Mathew, Priya Alice Nair, Rajesh Sasidharan Christaine Angelo, Jeyabalaji Mano Mathai, Vijay Vineet, R. V. Christopher, Sarah Renjelina |
author_facet | Mathew, Priya Alice Nair, Rajesh Sasidharan Christaine Angelo, Jeyabalaji Mano Mathai, Vijay Vineet, R. V. Christopher, Sarah Renjelina |
author_sort | Mathew, Priya Alice |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim of the study to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of FlexiCON (Edge Endo) files in rotary versus reciprocating motion in coronal, middle, and apical curvature of the simulated artificial canal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 36 new files, 25 mm length of ISO size 25 at the tip and a taper of 0.06, were used for the study and divided into two groups of 18 files each. Group I: FlexiCON X(3), was used in a rotary motion and Group II: FlexiCON X(1) was used in a reciprocating motion. Cyclic fatigue testing was conducted in a custom-made device that allowed for a reproducible simulation of a curved canal. The canal system, which comprised two adjustable stainless steel blocks, had a 60° angle of curvature and 3 mm width. The groups were further divided into three subgroups with six files in each, representing apical curvature (Group Ia/IIa), middle curvature (Group Ib/IIb), and Coronal curvature (Group Ic/IIc). Using X-Smart plus motor, files were used in rotary and reciprocating mode and the number of cycles to failure was recorded. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Post hoc followed by Dunnett's test and unpaired t-test using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 16 version. RESULTS: FlexiCON X1 reciprocating files showed the maximum cyclic fatigue resistance at coronal curvature (1936.50 ± 1.09) followed by middle (1514.50 ± 1.07) and apical curvature (1487.50 ± 6.75), while FlexiCON X3 rotary files showed the maximum cyclic fatigue at the middle curvature (1106.00 ± 4.21), followed by coronal (920.00 ± 1.16) and apical curvature (757.00 ± 5.34). The statistical analysis revealed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.001) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: FlexiCON X1 reciprocating files showed better cyclic fatigue resistance at coronal, middle, and apical curvature compared to FlexiCON X3 rotary files. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7542075 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75420752020-10-20 A comparative evaluation of cyclic fatigue resistance of FlexiCON (Edge Endo) files in rotary versus reciprocating motion at various curvatures – An in vitro study Mathew, Priya Alice Nair, Rajesh Sasidharan Christaine Angelo, Jeyabalaji Mano Mathai, Vijay Vineet, R. V. Christopher, Sarah Renjelina J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The aim of the study to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of FlexiCON (Edge Endo) files in rotary versus reciprocating motion in coronal, middle, and apical curvature of the simulated artificial canal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 36 new files, 25 mm length of ISO size 25 at the tip and a taper of 0.06, were used for the study and divided into two groups of 18 files each. Group I: FlexiCON X(3), was used in a rotary motion and Group II: FlexiCON X(1) was used in a reciprocating motion. Cyclic fatigue testing was conducted in a custom-made device that allowed for a reproducible simulation of a curved canal. The canal system, which comprised two adjustable stainless steel blocks, had a 60° angle of curvature and 3 mm width. The groups were further divided into three subgroups with six files in each, representing apical curvature (Group Ia/IIa), middle curvature (Group Ib/IIb), and Coronal curvature (Group Ic/IIc). Using X-Smart plus motor, files were used in rotary and reciprocating mode and the number of cycles to failure was recorded. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Post hoc followed by Dunnett's test and unpaired t-test using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 16 version. RESULTS: FlexiCON X1 reciprocating files showed the maximum cyclic fatigue resistance at coronal curvature (1936.50 ± 1.09) followed by middle (1514.50 ± 1.07) and apical curvature (1487.50 ± 6.75), while FlexiCON X3 rotary files showed the maximum cyclic fatigue at the middle curvature (1106.00 ± 4.21), followed by coronal (920.00 ± 1.16) and apical curvature (757.00 ± 5.34). The statistical analysis revealed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.001) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: FlexiCON X1 reciprocating files showed better cyclic fatigue resistance at coronal, middle, and apical curvature compared to FlexiCON X3 rotary files. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7542075/ /pubmed/33088064 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_203_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mathew, Priya Alice Nair, Rajesh Sasidharan Christaine Angelo, Jeyabalaji Mano Mathai, Vijay Vineet, R. V. Christopher, Sarah Renjelina A comparative evaluation of cyclic fatigue resistance of FlexiCON (Edge Endo) files in rotary versus reciprocating motion at various curvatures – An in vitro study |
title | A comparative evaluation of cyclic fatigue resistance of FlexiCON (Edge Endo) files in rotary versus reciprocating motion at various curvatures – An in vitro study |
title_full | A comparative evaluation of cyclic fatigue resistance of FlexiCON (Edge Endo) files in rotary versus reciprocating motion at various curvatures – An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | A comparative evaluation of cyclic fatigue resistance of FlexiCON (Edge Endo) files in rotary versus reciprocating motion at various curvatures – An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative evaluation of cyclic fatigue resistance of FlexiCON (Edge Endo) files in rotary versus reciprocating motion at various curvatures – An in vitro study |
title_short | A comparative evaluation of cyclic fatigue resistance of FlexiCON (Edge Endo) files in rotary versus reciprocating motion at various curvatures – An in vitro study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of cyclic fatigue resistance of flexicon (edge endo) files in rotary versus reciprocating motion at various curvatures – an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33088064 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_203_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mathewpriyaalice acomparativeevaluationofcyclicfatigueresistanceofflexiconedgeendofilesinrotaryversusreciprocatingmotionatvariouscurvaturesaninvitrostudy AT nairrajeshsasidharan acomparativeevaluationofcyclicfatigueresistanceofflexiconedgeendofilesinrotaryversusreciprocatingmotionatvariouscurvaturesaninvitrostudy AT christaineangelojeyabalajimano acomparativeevaluationofcyclicfatigueresistanceofflexiconedgeendofilesinrotaryversusreciprocatingmotionatvariouscurvaturesaninvitrostudy AT mathaivijay acomparativeevaluationofcyclicfatigueresistanceofflexiconedgeendofilesinrotaryversusreciprocatingmotionatvariouscurvaturesaninvitrostudy AT vineetrv acomparativeevaluationofcyclicfatigueresistanceofflexiconedgeendofilesinrotaryversusreciprocatingmotionatvariouscurvaturesaninvitrostudy AT christophersarahrenjelina acomparativeevaluationofcyclicfatigueresistanceofflexiconedgeendofilesinrotaryversusreciprocatingmotionatvariouscurvaturesaninvitrostudy AT mathewpriyaalice comparativeevaluationofcyclicfatigueresistanceofflexiconedgeendofilesinrotaryversusreciprocatingmotionatvariouscurvaturesaninvitrostudy AT nairrajeshsasidharan comparativeevaluationofcyclicfatigueresistanceofflexiconedgeendofilesinrotaryversusreciprocatingmotionatvariouscurvaturesaninvitrostudy AT christaineangelojeyabalajimano comparativeevaluationofcyclicfatigueresistanceofflexiconedgeendofilesinrotaryversusreciprocatingmotionatvariouscurvaturesaninvitrostudy AT mathaivijay comparativeevaluationofcyclicfatigueresistanceofflexiconedgeendofilesinrotaryversusreciprocatingmotionatvariouscurvaturesaninvitrostudy AT vineetrv comparativeevaluationofcyclicfatigueresistanceofflexiconedgeendofilesinrotaryversusreciprocatingmotionatvariouscurvaturesaninvitrostudy AT christophersarahrenjelina comparativeevaluationofcyclicfatigueresistanceofflexiconedgeendofilesinrotaryversusreciprocatingmotionatvariouscurvaturesaninvitrostudy |