Cargando…

Evaluation of Success Rate of Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair Compared to Vitapex in Pulpally Involved Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Vitapex has been a popular obturating material for several decades. In recent times, lesion sterilization and tissue repair (LSTR) has shown promising results. This technique uses a mixture of 3 antibiotics for sterilization of the root canals and healing of periradicular tissues. OBJECT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agarwal, Smital R., Bendgude, Vikas D., Kakodkar, Pradnya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33088056
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_76_20
_version_ 1783591486680465408
author Agarwal, Smital R.
Bendgude, Vikas D.
Kakodkar, Pradnya
author_facet Agarwal, Smital R.
Bendgude, Vikas D.
Kakodkar, Pradnya
author_sort Agarwal, Smital R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vitapex has been a popular obturating material for several decades. In recent times, lesion sterilization and tissue repair (LSTR) has shown promising results. This technique uses a mixture of 3 antibiotics for sterilization of the root canals and healing of periradicular tissues. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to compile all the literature comparing Vitapex and LSTR for pulpally involved primary teeth and evaluate the success rate in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review is based on PRISMA guidelines. The electronic search on MEDLINE via PubMed database and Google scholar, cross-referencing and hand search of journals was carried out for articles from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2019. Articles only in the English language were selected. Out of the 17 articles, 3 unique articles were identified for the review, of which 2 were randomized controlled trials and 1 was a retrospective study. RESULTS: All the three articles were assessed for their quality and all had a low risk of bias. It was found that LSTR and Vitapex had a high clinical success after 12 months. The radiographic success after 6 months was high but decreased after 12 months in both the groups. CONCLUSION: There is no difference in the success rate of LSTR as compared to Vitapex for the treatment of pulpally involved primary teeth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7542077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75420772020-10-20 Evaluation of Success Rate of Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair Compared to Vitapex in Pulpally Involved Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review Agarwal, Smital R. Bendgude, Vikas D. Kakodkar, Pradnya J Conserv Dent Review Article BACKGROUND: Vitapex has been a popular obturating material for several decades. In recent times, lesion sterilization and tissue repair (LSTR) has shown promising results. This technique uses a mixture of 3 antibiotics for sterilization of the root canals and healing of periradicular tissues. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to compile all the literature comparing Vitapex and LSTR for pulpally involved primary teeth and evaluate the success rate in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review is based on PRISMA guidelines. The electronic search on MEDLINE via PubMed database and Google scholar, cross-referencing and hand search of journals was carried out for articles from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2019. Articles only in the English language were selected. Out of the 17 articles, 3 unique articles were identified for the review, of which 2 were randomized controlled trials and 1 was a retrospective study. RESULTS: All the three articles were assessed for their quality and all had a low risk of bias. It was found that LSTR and Vitapex had a high clinical success after 12 months. The radiographic success after 6 months was high but decreased after 12 months in both the groups. CONCLUSION: There is no difference in the success rate of LSTR as compared to Vitapex for the treatment of pulpally involved primary teeth. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7542077/ /pubmed/33088056 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_76_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Agarwal, Smital R.
Bendgude, Vikas D.
Kakodkar, Pradnya
Evaluation of Success Rate of Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair Compared to Vitapex in Pulpally Involved Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review
title Evaluation of Success Rate of Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair Compared to Vitapex in Pulpally Involved Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review
title_full Evaluation of Success Rate of Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair Compared to Vitapex in Pulpally Involved Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Evaluation of Success Rate of Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair Compared to Vitapex in Pulpally Involved Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Success Rate of Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair Compared to Vitapex in Pulpally Involved Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review
title_short Evaluation of Success Rate of Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair Compared to Vitapex in Pulpally Involved Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review
title_sort evaluation of success rate of lesion sterilization and tissue repair compared to vitapex in pulpally involved primary teeth: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33088056
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_76_20
work_keys_str_mv AT agarwalsmitalr evaluationofsuccessrateoflesionsterilizationandtissuerepaircomparedtovitapexinpulpallyinvolvedprimaryteethasystematicreview
AT bendgudevikasd evaluationofsuccessrateoflesionsterilizationandtissuerepaircomparedtovitapexinpulpallyinvolvedprimaryteethasystematicreview
AT kakodkarpradnya evaluationofsuccessrateoflesionsterilizationandtissuerepaircomparedtovitapexinpulpallyinvolvedprimaryteethasystematicreview