Cargando…

Evaluation of remaining dentin thickness following use of three different rotary nickel–titanium retreatment files: A cone-beam computed tomography study

AIM: The aim of the study is to measure the amount of remaining dentin thickness (RDT) following retreatment using three different rotary nickel–titanium (NiTi) systems. METHODOLOGY: Mesiobuccal roots of 45 extracted maxillary first molars were prepared up to F(2) ProTaper File and obturated. After...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kulkarni, Nishita Rajeev, Kamat, Sharad Basavraj, Hugar, Santosh Irappa, Nanjannawar, Girish Shankar, Patil, Pranav Devendra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33088071
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_269_19
_version_ 1783591488768180224
author Kulkarni, Nishita Rajeev
Kamat, Sharad Basavraj
Hugar, Santosh Irappa
Nanjannawar, Girish Shankar
Patil, Pranav Devendra
author_facet Kulkarni, Nishita Rajeev
Kamat, Sharad Basavraj
Hugar, Santosh Irappa
Nanjannawar, Girish Shankar
Patil, Pranav Devendra
author_sort Kulkarni, Nishita Rajeev
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of the study is to measure the amount of remaining dentin thickness (RDT) following retreatment using three different rotary nickel–titanium (NiTi) systems. METHODOLOGY: Mesiobuccal roots of 45 extracted maxillary first molars were prepared up to F(2) ProTaper File and obturated. After cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging, to evaluate the obturation, the samples were randomly assigned to three retreatment groups (n = 15). Group I was retreated with ProTaper Universal retreatment kit, Group II and III with M(TWO) and D-Race retreatment files, respectively. Postoperatively, all samples were subjected to CBCT imaging and evaluated with AutoCAD software (AutoDesk, Inc.) Mill Valley, California, U.S. to calculate the RDT. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests, and the level of significance was set at P = 0.05. RESULTS: The amount of RDT was significantly more in D-Race and M(TWO) groups when compared to ProTaper group. CONCLUSION: D-Race and M(TWO) instruments were associated with significantly more RDT than ProTaper.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7542086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75420862020-10-20 Evaluation of remaining dentin thickness following use of three different rotary nickel–titanium retreatment files: A cone-beam computed tomography study Kulkarni, Nishita Rajeev Kamat, Sharad Basavraj Hugar, Santosh Irappa Nanjannawar, Girish Shankar Patil, Pranav Devendra J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The aim of the study is to measure the amount of remaining dentin thickness (RDT) following retreatment using three different rotary nickel–titanium (NiTi) systems. METHODOLOGY: Mesiobuccal roots of 45 extracted maxillary first molars were prepared up to F(2) ProTaper File and obturated. After cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging, to evaluate the obturation, the samples were randomly assigned to three retreatment groups (n = 15). Group I was retreated with ProTaper Universal retreatment kit, Group II and III with M(TWO) and D-Race retreatment files, respectively. Postoperatively, all samples were subjected to CBCT imaging and evaluated with AutoCAD software (AutoDesk, Inc.) Mill Valley, California, U.S. to calculate the RDT. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests, and the level of significance was set at P = 0.05. RESULTS: The amount of RDT was significantly more in D-Race and M(TWO) groups when compared to ProTaper group. CONCLUSION: D-Race and M(TWO) instruments were associated with significantly more RDT than ProTaper. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7542086/ /pubmed/33088071 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_269_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kulkarni, Nishita Rajeev
Kamat, Sharad Basavraj
Hugar, Santosh Irappa
Nanjannawar, Girish Shankar
Patil, Pranav Devendra
Evaluation of remaining dentin thickness following use of three different rotary nickel–titanium retreatment files: A cone-beam computed tomography study
title Evaluation of remaining dentin thickness following use of three different rotary nickel–titanium retreatment files: A cone-beam computed tomography study
title_full Evaluation of remaining dentin thickness following use of three different rotary nickel–titanium retreatment files: A cone-beam computed tomography study
title_fullStr Evaluation of remaining dentin thickness following use of three different rotary nickel–titanium retreatment files: A cone-beam computed tomography study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of remaining dentin thickness following use of three different rotary nickel–titanium retreatment files: A cone-beam computed tomography study
title_short Evaluation of remaining dentin thickness following use of three different rotary nickel–titanium retreatment files: A cone-beam computed tomography study
title_sort evaluation of remaining dentin thickness following use of three different rotary nickel–titanium retreatment files: a cone-beam computed tomography study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33088071
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_269_19
work_keys_str_mv AT kulkarninishitarajeev evaluationofremainingdentinthicknessfollowinguseofthreedifferentrotarynickeltitaniumretreatmentfilesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy
AT kamatsharadbasavraj evaluationofremainingdentinthicknessfollowinguseofthreedifferentrotarynickeltitaniumretreatmentfilesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy
AT hugarsantoshirappa evaluationofremainingdentinthicknessfollowinguseofthreedifferentrotarynickeltitaniumretreatmentfilesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy
AT nanjannawargirishshankar evaluationofremainingdentinthicknessfollowinguseofthreedifferentrotarynickeltitaniumretreatmentfilesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy
AT patilpranavdevendra evaluationofremainingdentinthicknessfollowinguseofthreedifferentrotarynickeltitaniumretreatmentfilesaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy