Cargando…
Thrombolysis implementation intervention and clinical outcome: a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial
BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have attempted to increase the rate of intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke using interventions to promote adherence to guidelines. Still, many of them did not measure individual-level impact. This study aimed to make a posthoc comparison of the clinical outcomes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33023494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01705-9 |
_version_ | 1783591497484992512 |
---|---|
author | Hasnain, Md Golam Paul, Christine L. Attia, John R. Ryan, Annika Kerr, Erin Oldmeadow, Christopher D’Este, Catherine A. Bivard, Andrew Hubbard, Isobel J. Milton, Abul Hasnat Levi, Christopher R. |
author_facet | Hasnain, Md Golam Paul, Christine L. Attia, John R. Ryan, Annika Kerr, Erin Oldmeadow, Christopher D’Este, Catherine A. Bivard, Andrew Hubbard, Isobel J. Milton, Abul Hasnat Levi, Christopher R. |
author_sort | Hasnain, Md Golam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have attempted to increase the rate of intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke using interventions to promote adherence to guidelines. Still, many of them did not measure individual-level impact. This study aimed to make a posthoc comparison of the clinical outcomes of patients in the “Thrombolysis ImPlementation in Stroke (TIPS)” study, which aimed to improve rates of intravenous thrombolysis in Australia. METHODS: A posthoc analysis was conducted using individual-level patient data. Excellent (Three-month post treatment modified Rankin Score 0–2) and poor clinical outcome (Three-month post treatment modified Rankin Score 5–6) and post treatment parenchymal haematoma were the three main outcomes, and a mixed logistic regression model was used to assess the difference between the intervention and control groups. RESULTS: There was a non-significant higher odds of having an excellent clinical outcome of 57% (odds ratio: 1.57; 95% CI: 0.73–3.39) and 33% (odds ratio: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.73–2.44) during the active-and post-intervention period respectively, for the intervention compared to the control group. A non-significant lower odds of having a poor clinical outcome was also found in the intervention, relative to control group of 4% (odds ratio: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.56–2.07) and higher odds of having poor outcome of 44% (odds ratio: 1.44 95% CI: 0.61–3.41) during both active and post-intervention period respectively. Similarly, a non-significant lower odds of parenchymal haematoma was also found for the intervention group during the both active- (odds ratio: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.21–1.32) and post-intervention period (odds ratio: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.36–2.52). CONCLUSION: The TIPS multi-component implementation approach was not effective in reducing the odds of post-treatment severe disability at 90 days, or post-thrombolysis hemorrhage. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.anzctr.org.au/ Unique Identifier: ACTRN12613000939796. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7542125 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75421252020-10-08 Thrombolysis implementation intervention and clinical outcome: a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial Hasnain, Md Golam Paul, Christine L. Attia, John R. Ryan, Annika Kerr, Erin Oldmeadow, Christopher D’Este, Catherine A. Bivard, Andrew Hubbard, Isobel J. Milton, Abul Hasnat Levi, Christopher R. BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have attempted to increase the rate of intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke using interventions to promote adherence to guidelines. Still, many of them did not measure individual-level impact. This study aimed to make a posthoc comparison of the clinical outcomes of patients in the “Thrombolysis ImPlementation in Stroke (TIPS)” study, which aimed to improve rates of intravenous thrombolysis in Australia. METHODS: A posthoc analysis was conducted using individual-level patient data. Excellent (Three-month post treatment modified Rankin Score 0–2) and poor clinical outcome (Three-month post treatment modified Rankin Score 5–6) and post treatment parenchymal haematoma were the three main outcomes, and a mixed logistic regression model was used to assess the difference between the intervention and control groups. RESULTS: There was a non-significant higher odds of having an excellent clinical outcome of 57% (odds ratio: 1.57; 95% CI: 0.73–3.39) and 33% (odds ratio: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.73–2.44) during the active-and post-intervention period respectively, for the intervention compared to the control group. A non-significant lower odds of having a poor clinical outcome was also found in the intervention, relative to control group of 4% (odds ratio: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.56–2.07) and higher odds of having poor outcome of 44% (odds ratio: 1.44 95% CI: 0.61–3.41) during both active and post-intervention period respectively. Similarly, a non-significant lower odds of parenchymal haematoma was also found for the intervention group during the both active- (odds ratio: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.21–1.32) and post-intervention period (odds ratio: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.36–2.52). CONCLUSION: The TIPS multi-component implementation approach was not effective in reducing the odds of post-treatment severe disability at 90 days, or post-thrombolysis hemorrhage. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.anzctr.org.au/ Unique Identifier: ACTRN12613000939796. BioMed Central 2020-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7542125/ /pubmed/33023494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01705-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hasnain, Md Golam Paul, Christine L. Attia, John R. Ryan, Annika Kerr, Erin Oldmeadow, Christopher D’Este, Catherine A. Bivard, Andrew Hubbard, Isobel J. Milton, Abul Hasnat Levi, Christopher R. Thrombolysis implementation intervention and clinical outcome: a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial |
title | Thrombolysis implementation intervention and clinical outcome: a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial |
title_full | Thrombolysis implementation intervention and clinical outcome: a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Thrombolysis implementation intervention and clinical outcome: a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Thrombolysis implementation intervention and clinical outcome: a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial |
title_short | Thrombolysis implementation intervention and clinical outcome: a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial |
title_sort | thrombolysis implementation intervention and clinical outcome: a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33023494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01705-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hasnainmdgolam thrombolysisimplementationinterventionandclinicaloutcomeasecondaryanalysisofaclusterrandomizedtrial AT paulchristinel thrombolysisimplementationinterventionandclinicaloutcomeasecondaryanalysisofaclusterrandomizedtrial AT attiajohnr thrombolysisimplementationinterventionandclinicaloutcomeasecondaryanalysisofaclusterrandomizedtrial AT ryanannika thrombolysisimplementationinterventionandclinicaloutcomeasecondaryanalysisofaclusterrandomizedtrial AT kerrerin thrombolysisimplementationinterventionandclinicaloutcomeasecondaryanalysisofaclusterrandomizedtrial AT oldmeadowchristopher thrombolysisimplementationinterventionandclinicaloutcomeasecondaryanalysisofaclusterrandomizedtrial AT destecatherinea thrombolysisimplementationinterventionandclinicaloutcomeasecondaryanalysisofaclusterrandomizedtrial AT bivardandrew thrombolysisimplementationinterventionandclinicaloutcomeasecondaryanalysisofaclusterrandomizedtrial AT hubbardisobelj thrombolysisimplementationinterventionandclinicaloutcomeasecondaryanalysisofaclusterrandomizedtrial AT miltonabulhasnat thrombolysisimplementationinterventionandclinicaloutcomeasecondaryanalysisofaclusterrandomizedtrial AT levichristopherr thrombolysisimplementationinterventionandclinicaloutcomeasecondaryanalysisofaclusterrandomizedtrial |