Cargando…
Femoral anteversion: significance and measurement
Femoral neck anteversion (FNA) is the angle between the femoral neck and femoral shaft, indicating the degree of torsion of the femur. Differences in FNA affect the biomechanics of the hip, through alterations in factors such as moment arm lengths and joint loading. Altered gait associated with diff...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32579722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13249 |
_version_ | 1783591512052858880 |
---|---|
author | Scorcelletti, Matteo Reeves, Neil D. Rittweger, Jörn Ireland, Alex |
author_facet | Scorcelletti, Matteo Reeves, Neil D. Rittweger, Jörn Ireland, Alex |
author_sort | Scorcelletti, Matteo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Femoral neck anteversion (FNA) is the angle between the femoral neck and femoral shaft, indicating the degree of torsion of the femur. Differences in FNA affect the biomechanics of the hip, through alterations in factors such as moment arm lengths and joint loading. Altered gait associated with differences in FNA may also contribute to the development of a wide range of skeletal disorders including osteoarthritis. FNA varies by up to 30° within apparently healthy adults. FNA increases substantially during gestation and thereafter decreases steadily until maturity. There is some evidence of a further decrease at a much lower rate during adulthood into old age, but the mechanisms behind it have never been studied. Development of FNA appears to be strongly influenced by mechanical forces experienced during everyday movements. This is evidenced by large differences in FNA in groups where movement is impaired, such as children born breech or individuals with neuromuscular conditions such as cerebral palsy. Several methods can be used to assess FNA, which may yield different values by up to 20° in the same participant. While MRI and CT are used clinically, limitations such as their cost, scanning time and exposure to ionising radiation limit their applicability in longitudinal and population studies, particularly in children. More broadly, applicable measures such as ultrasound and functional tests exist, but they are limited by poor reliability and validity. These issues highlight the need for a valid and reliable universally accepted method. Treatment for clinically problematic FNA is usually de‐rotational osteotomy; passive, non‐operative methods do not have any effect. Despite observational evidence for the effects of physical activity on FNA development, the efficacy of targeted physical activity remains unexplored. The aim of this review is to describe the biomechanical and clinical consequences of FNA, factors influencing FNA and the strengths and weaknesses of different methods used to assess FNA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7542196 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75421962020-10-16 Femoral anteversion: significance and measurement Scorcelletti, Matteo Reeves, Neil D. Rittweger, Jörn Ireland, Alex J Anat Review Article Femoral neck anteversion (FNA) is the angle between the femoral neck and femoral shaft, indicating the degree of torsion of the femur. Differences in FNA affect the biomechanics of the hip, through alterations in factors such as moment arm lengths and joint loading. Altered gait associated with differences in FNA may also contribute to the development of a wide range of skeletal disorders including osteoarthritis. FNA varies by up to 30° within apparently healthy adults. FNA increases substantially during gestation and thereafter decreases steadily until maturity. There is some evidence of a further decrease at a much lower rate during adulthood into old age, but the mechanisms behind it have never been studied. Development of FNA appears to be strongly influenced by mechanical forces experienced during everyday movements. This is evidenced by large differences in FNA in groups where movement is impaired, such as children born breech or individuals with neuromuscular conditions such as cerebral palsy. Several methods can be used to assess FNA, which may yield different values by up to 20° in the same participant. While MRI and CT are used clinically, limitations such as their cost, scanning time and exposure to ionising radiation limit their applicability in longitudinal and population studies, particularly in children. More broadly, applicable measures such as ultrasound and functional tests exist, but they are limited by poor reliability and validity. These issues highlight the need for a valid and reliable universally accepted method. Treatment for clinically problematic FNA is usually de‐rotational osteotomy; passive, non‐operative methods do not have any effect. Despite observational evidence for the effects of physical activity on FNA development, the efficacy of targeted physical activity remains unexplored. The aim of this review is to describe the biomechanical and clinical consequences of FNA, factors influencing FNA and the strengths and weaknesses of different methods used to assess FNA. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-24 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7542196/ /pubmed/32579722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13249 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Anatomy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Anatomical Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Scorcelletti, Matteo Reeves, Neil D. Rittweger, Jörn Ireland, Alex Femoral anteversion: significance and measurement |
title | Femoral anteversion: significance and measurement |
title_full | Femoral anteversion: significance and measurement |
title_fullStr | Femoral anteversion: significance and measurement |
title_full_unstemmed | Femoral anteversion: significance and measurement |
title_short | Femoral anteversion: significance and measurement |
title_sort | femoral anteversion: significance and measurement |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32579722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13249 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scorcellettimatteo femoralanteversionsignificanceandmeasurement AT reevesneild femoralanteversionsignificanceandmeasurement AT rittwegerjorn femoralanteversionsignificanceandmeasurement AT irelandalex femoralanteversionsignificanceandmeasurement |