Cargando…
Case Report: Non-microscopic surgical management of incomplete penile amputation
Background: Penile amputation is an emergency urologic condition requiring immediate attention in order to maximize functional outcomes. Unfortunately, there is limited experience and publication of case reports describing the successful replantation of penis after incomplete amputation, especially...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33082932 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23775.2 |
_version_ | 1783591518062247936 |
---|---|
author | Putra, Donny Eka Kusbin, Theddyon Bhenlie Apry Satyagraha, Paksi Widodo, Stephanie Taneysa |
author_facet | Putra, Donny Eka Kusbin, Theddyon Bhenlie Apry Satyagraha, Paksi Widodo, Stephanie Taneysa |
author_sort | Putra, Donny Eka |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Penile amputation is an emergency urologic condition requiring immediate attention in order to maximize functional outcomes. Unfortunately, there is limited experience and publication of case reports describing the successful replantation of penis after incomplete amputation, especially in facilities without adequate microsurgical tools and means. We hereby present a case of penile amputation caused by a mechanical grass cutter and a discussion of its surgical management. Case description: A 33-year-old Indonesian male presented to the emergency department with incomplete penile amputation six hours post injury. The patient has no prior medical history and presented with penile amputation due to a mechanical grass cutter trauma. He underwent immediate non-microsurgery reconstructive replantation of the penis, reattaching all visible vascular, corporal, and fascia layers. After replantation, the patient recovered well and showed preserved normal appearance and sensitivity of the penis. Subsequent Doppler ultrasound investigation revealed adequate arterial flow at the distal end of the anastomosis. The patient was discharged five days after surgery. Conclusion: In the absence of microsurgical tools and means, the use of non-microsurgical replantation with an at least 2.5x loupe magnification should be the choice of treatment in the case of incomplete penile amputation. The technique showed good outcomes involving adequate functional and cosmetic restoration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7542248 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75422482020-10-19 Case Report: Non-microscopic surgical management of incomplete penile amputation Putra, Donny Eka Kusbin, Theddyon Bhenlie Apry Satyagraha, Paksi Widodo, Stephanie Taneysa F1000Res Case Report Background: Penile amputation is an emergency urologic condition requiring immediate attention in order to maximize functional outcomes. Unfortunately, there is limited experience and publication of case reports describing the successful replantation of penis after incomplete amputation, especially in facilities without adequate microsurgical tools and means. We hereby present a case of penile amputation caused by a mechanical grass cutter and a discussion of its surgical management. Case description: A 33-year-old Indonesian male presented to the emergency department with incomplete penile amputation six hours post injury. The patient has no prior medical history and presented with penile amputation due to a mechanical grass cutter trauma. He underwent immediate non-microsurgery reconstructive replantation of the penis, reattaching all visible vascular, corporal, and fascia layers. After replantation, the patient recovered well and showed preserved normal appearance and sensitivity of the penis. Subsequent Doppler ultrasound investigation revealed adequate arterial flow at the distal end of the anastomosis. The patient was discharged five days after surgery. Conclusion: In the absence of microsurgical tools and means, the use of non-microsurgical replantation with an at least 2.5x loupe magnification should be the choice of treatment in the case of incomplete penile amputation. The technique showed good outcomes involving adequate functional and cosmetic restoration. F1000 Research Limited 2020-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7542248/ /pubmed/33082932 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23775.2 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Putra DE et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Putra, Donny Eka Kusbin, Theddyon Bhenlie Apry Satyagraha, Paksi Widodo, Stephanie Taneysa Case Report: Non-microscopic surgical management of incomplete penile amputation |
title | Case Report: Non-microscopic surgical management of incomplete penile amputation |
title_full | Case Report: Non-microscopic surgical management of incomplete penile amputation |
title_fullStr | Case Report: Non-microscopic surgical management of incomplete penile amputation |
title_full_unstemmed | Case Report: Non-microscopic surgical management of incomplete penile amputation |
title_short | Case Report: Non-microscopic surgical management of incomplete penile amputation |
title_sort | case report: non-microscopic surgical management of incomplete penile amputation |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33082932 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23775.2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT putradonnyeka casereportnonmicroscopicsurgicalmanagementofincompletepenileamputation AT kusbintheddyonbhenlieapry casereportnonmicroscopicsurgicalmanagementofincompletepenileamputation AT satyagrahapaksi casereportnonmicroscopicsurgicalmanagementofincompletepenileamputation AT widodostephanietaneysa casereportnonmicroscopicsurgicalmanagementofincompletepenileamputation |