Cargando…
Appropriate CT cervical spine utilisation in the emergency department
INTRODUCTION: Over 40 000 CT scans are performed in our emergency department (ED) annually and utilisation is over 80% capacity. Improving medical appropriateness of CT scans may reduce total number of scans, time, cost and radiation exposure. METHODS: Lean Six Sigma methodology was used to improve...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33028655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000844 |
_version_ | 1783591584062767104 |
---|---|
author | Baker, Mark Jaeger, Cassie Hafley, Carol Waymack, James |
author_facet | Baker, Mark Jaeger, Cassie Hafley, Carol Waymack, James |
author_sort | Baker, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Over 40 000 CT scans are performed in our emergency department (ED) annually and utilisation is over 80% capacity. Improving medical appropriateness of CT scans may reduce total number of scans, time, cost and radiation exposure. METHODS: Lean Six Sigma methodology was used to improve the process. A National Emergency X-Radiography Utilisation Study (NEXUS)-based PowerForm was implemented in the electronic health record and providers were educated on the criteria. RESULTS: The rate of potentially medically inappropriate CT C-spine scans decreased from 45% (19/42) to 22% (90/403) (two-proportion test, p=0.002). After the intervention, there was no longer a difference between midlevel providers and physicians in the rate of medically inappropriate orders (19% vs 22%) (two-proportion test, p=0.850) compared with that before the intervention (56% vs 31%) (two-proportion test, p<0.01). Overall rates of CT C-spine scans ordered decreased from 69.3 to 62.6/week (t-test, p=0.019). CONCLUSION: A validated clinical decision-making tool implemented into the medical record can improve quality of care. This study lays a foundation for other imaging studies with validated support tools with similar potential improvements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7542617 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75426172020-10-19 Appropriate CT cervical spine utilisation in the emergency department Baker, Mark Jaeger, Cassie Hafley, Carol Waymack, James BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report INTRODUCTION: Over 40 000 CT scans are performed in our emergency department (ED) annually and utilisation is over 80% capacity. Improving medical appropriateness of CT scans may reduce total number of scans, time, cost and radiation exposure. METHODS: Lean Six Sigma methodology was used to improve the process. A National Emergency X-Radiography Utilisation Study (NEXUS)-based PowerForm was implemented in the electronic health record and providers were educated on the criteria. RESULTS: The rate of potentially medically inappropriate CT C-spine scans decreased from 45% (19/42) to 22% (90/403) (two-proportion test, p=0.002). After the intervention, there was no longer a difference between midlevel providers and physicians in the rate of medically inappropriate orders (19% vs 22%) (two-proportion test, p=0.850) compared with that before the intervention (56% vs 31%) (two-proportion test, p<0.01). Overall rates of CT C-spine scans ordered decreased from 69.3 to 62.6/week (t-test, p=0.019). CONCLUSION: A validated clinical decision-making tool implemented into the medical record can improve quality of care. This study lays a foundation for other imaging studies with validated support tools with similar potential improvements. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7542617/ /pubmed/33028655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000844 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Quality Improvement Report Baker, Mark Jaeger, Cassie Hafley, Carol Waymack, James Appropriate CT cervical spine utilisation in the emergency department |
title | Appropriate CT cervical spine utilisation in the emergency department |
title_full | Appropriate CT cervical spine utilisation in the emergency department |
title_fullStr | Appropriate CT cervical spine utilisation in the emergency department |
title_full_unstemmed | Appropriate CT cervical spine utilisation in the emergency department |
title_short | Appropriate CT cervical spine utilisation in the emergency department |
title_sort | appropriate ct cervical spine utilisation in the emergency department |
topic | Quality Improvement Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33028655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000844 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bakermark appropriatectcervicalspineutilisationintheemergencydepartment AT jaegercassie appropriatectcervicalspineutilisationintheemergencydepartment AT hafleycarol appropriatectcervicalspineutilisationintheemergencydepartment AT waymackjames appropriatectcervicalspineutilisationintheemergencydepartment |