Cargando…

Appropriate CT cervical spine utilisation in the emergency department

INTRODUCTION: Over 40 000 CT scans are performed in our emergency department (ED) annually and utilisation is over 80% capacity. Improving medical appropriateness of CT scans may reduce total number of scans, time, cost and radiation exposure. METHODS: Lean Six Sigma methodology was used to improve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baker, Mark, Jaeger, Cassie, Hafley, Carol, Waymack, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33028655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000844
_version_ 1783591584062767104
author Baker, Mark
Jaeger, Cassie
Hafley, Carol
Waymack, James
author_facet Baker, Mark
Jaeger, Cassie
Hafley, Carol
Waymack, James
author_sort Baker, Mark
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Over 40 000 CT scans are performed in our emergency department (ED) annually and utilisation is over 80% capacity. Improving medical appropriateness of CT scans may reduce total number of scans, time, cost and radiation exposure. METHODS: Lean Six Sigma methodology was used to improve the process. A National Emergency X-Radiography Utilisation Study (NEXUS)-based PowerForm was implemented in the electronic health record and providers were educated on the criteria. RESULTS: The rate of potentially medically inappropriate CT C-spine scans decreased from 45% (19/42) to 22% (90/403) (two-proportion test, p=0.002). After the intervention, there was no longer a difference between midlevel providers and physicians in the rate of medically inappropriate orders (19% vs 22%) (two-proportion test, p=0.850) compared with that before the intervention (56% vs 31%) (two-proportion test, p<0.01). Overall rates of CT C-spine scans ordered decreased from 69.3 to 62.6/week (t-test, p=0.019). CONCLUSION: A validated clinical decision-making tool implemented into the medical record can improve quality of care. This study lays a foundation for other imaging studies with validated support tools with similar potential improvements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7542617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75426172020-10-19 Appropriate CT cervical spine utilisation in the emergency department Baker, Mark Jaeger, Cassie Hafley, Carol Waymack, James BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report INTRODUCTION: Over 40 000 CT scans are performed in our emergency department (ED) annually and utilisation is over 80% capacity. Improving medical appropriateness of CT scans may reduce total number of scans, time, cost and radiation exposure. METHODS: Lean Six Sigma methodology was used to improve the process. A National Emergency X-Radiography Utilisation Study (NEXUS)-based PowerForm was implemented in the electronic health record and providers were educated on the criteria. RESULTS: The rate of potentially medically inappropriate CT C-spine scans decreased from 45% (19/42) to 22% (90/403) (two-proportion test, p=0.002). After the intervention, there was no longer a difference between midlevel providers and physicians in the rate of medically inappropriate orders (19% vs 22%) (two-proportion test, p=0.850) compared with that before the intervention (56% vs 31%) (two-proportion test, p<0.01). Overall rates of CT C-spine scans ordered decreased from 69.3 to 62.6/week (t-test, p=0.019). CONCLUSION: A validated clinical decision-making tool implemented into the medical record can improve quality of care. This study lays a foundation for other imaging studies with validated support tools with similar potential improvements. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7542617/ /pubmed/33028655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000844 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement Report
Baker, Mark
Jaeger, Cassie
Hafley, Carol
Waymack, James
Appropriate CT cervical spine utilisation in the emergency department
title Appropriate CT cervical spine utilisation in the emergency department
title_full Appropriate CT cervical spine utilisation in the emergency department
title_fullStr Appropriate CT cervical spine utilisation in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Appropriate CT cervical spine utilisation in the emergency department
title_short Appropriate CT cervical spine utilisation in the emergency department
title_sort appropriate ct cervical spine utilisation in the emergency department
topic Quality Improvement Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33028655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000844
work_keys_str_mv AT bakermark appropriatectcervicalspineutilisationintheemergencydepartment
AT jaegercassie appropriatectcervicalspineutilisationintheemergencydepartment
AT hafleycarol appropriatectcervicalspineutilisationintheemergencydepartment
AT waymackjames appropriatectcervicalspineutilisationintheemergencydepartment