Cargando…

Gene signature of antigen processing and presentation machinery predicts response to checkpoint blockade in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on the role of alterations in HLA Class I antigen processing and presentation machinery in mediating response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed transcriptional profiles from pre-treatment tumor samples of 51 chemothe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, Jeffrey C, Davis, Christiana, Deshpande, Charuhas, Hwang, Wei-Ting, Jeffries, Seth, Huang, Alexander, Mitchell, Tara C, Langer, Corey J, Albelda, Steven M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33028693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-000974
_version_ 1783591588323131392
author Thompson, Jeffrey C
Davis, Christiana
Deshpande, Charuhas
Hwang, Wei-Ting
Jeffries, Seth
Huang, Alexander
Mitchell, Tara C
Langer, Corey J
Albelda, Steven M
author_facet Thompson, Jeffrey C
Davis, Christiana
Deshpande, Charuhas
Hwang, Wei-Ting
Jeffries, Seth
Huang, Alexander
Mitchell, Tara C
Langer, Corey J
Albelda, Steven M
author_sort Thompson, Jeffrey C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on the role of alterations in HLA Class I antigen processing and presentation machinery in mediating response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed transcriptional profiles from pre-treatment tumor samples of 51 chemotherapy-refractory advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and two independent melanoma cohorts treated with ICB. An antigen processing machinery (APM) score was generated utilizing eight genes associated with APM (B2M, CALR, NLRC5, PSMB9, PSME1, PSME3, RFX5, and HSP90AB1). Associations were made for therapeutic response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In NSCLC, the APM score was significantly higher in responders compared with non-responders (p=0.0001). An APM score above the median value for the cohort was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.34 (0.18 to 0.64), p=0.001) and OS (HR 0.44 (0.23 to 0.83), p=0.006). The APM score was correlated with an inflammation score based on the established T-cell-inflamed resistance gene expression profile (Pearson’s r=0.58, p<0.0001). However, the APM score better predicted response to ICB relative to the inflammation score with area under a receiving operating characteristics curve of 0.84 and 0.70 for PFS and OS, respectively. In a cohort of 14 high-risk resectable stage III/IV melanoma patients treated with neoadjuvant anti-PD1 ICB, a higher APM score was associated with improved disease-free survival (HR: 0.08 (0.01 to 0.50), p=0.0065). In an additional independent melanoma cohort of 27 metastatic patients treated with ICB, a higher APM score was associated with improved OS (HR 0.29 (0.09 to 0.89), p=0.044). CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that defects in antigen presentation may be an important feature in predicting outcomes to ICB in both lung cancer and melanoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7542663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75426632020-10-19 Gene signature of antigen processing and presentation machinery predicts response to checkpoint blockade in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma Thompson, Jeffrey C Davis, Christiana Deshpande, Charuhas Hwang, Wei-Ting Jeffries, Seth Huang, Alexander Mitchell, Tara C Langer, Corey J Albelda, Steven M J Immunother Cancer Immunotherapy Biomarkers BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on the role of alterations in HLA Class I antigen processing and presentation machinery in mediating response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed transcriptional profiles from pre-treatment tumor samples of 51 chemotherapy-refractory advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and two independent melanoma cohorts treated with ICB. An antigen processing machinery (APM) score was generated utilizing eight genes associated with APM (B2M, CALR, NLRC5, PSMB9, PSME1, PSME3, RFX5, and HSP90AB1). Associations were made for therapeutic response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In NSCLC, the APM score was significantly higher in responders compared with non-responders (p=0.0001). An APM score above the median value for the cohort was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.34 (0.18 to 0.64), p=0.001) and OS (HR 0.44 (0.23 to 0.83), p=0.006). The APM score was correlated with an inflammation score based on the established T-cell-inflamed resistance gene expression profile (Pearson’s r=0.58, p<0.0001). However, the APM score better predicted response to ICB relative to the inflammation score with area under a receiving operating characteristics curve of 0.84 and 0.70 for PFS and OS, respectively. In a cohort of 14 high-risk resectable stage III/IV melanoma patients treated with neoadjuvant anti-PD1 ICB, a higher APM score was associated with improved disease-free survival (HR: 0.08 (0.01 to 0.50), p=0.0065). In an additional independent melanoma cohort of 27 metastatic patients treated with ICB, a higher APM score was associated with improved OS (HR 0.29 (0.09 to 0.89), p=0.044). CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that defects in antigen presentation may be an important feature in predicting outcomes to ICB in both lung cancer and melanoma. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7542663/ /pubmed/33028693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-000974 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Immunotherapy Biomarkers
Thompson, Jeffrey C
Davis, Christiana
Deshpande, Charuhas
Hwang, Wei-Ting
Jeffries, Seth
Huang, Alexander
Mitchell, Tara C
Langer, Corey J
Albelda, Steven M
Gene signature of antigen processing and presentation machinery predicts response to checkpoint blockade in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma
title Gene signature of antigen processing and presentation machinery predicts response to checkpoint blockade in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma
title_full Gene signature of antigen processing and presentation machinery predicts response to checkpoint blockade in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma
title_fullStr Gene signature of antigen processing and presentation machinery predicts response to checkpoint blockade in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma
title_full_unstemmed Gene signature of antigen processing and presentation machinery predicts response to checkpoint blockade in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma
title_short Gene signature of antigen processing and presentation machinery predicts response to checkpoint blockade in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma
title_sort gene signature of antigen processing and presentation machinery predicts response to checkpoint blockade in non-small cell lung cancer (nsclc) and melanoma
topic Immunotherapy Biomarkers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33028693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-000974
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsonjeffreyc genesignatureofantigenprocessingandpresentationmachinerypredictsresponsetocheckpointblockadeinnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcandmelanoma
AT davischristiana genesignatureofantigenprocessingandpresentationmachinerypredictsresponsetocheckpointblockadeinnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcandmelanoma
AT deshpandecharuhas genesignatureofantigenprocessingandpresentationmachinerypredictsresponsetocheckpointblockadeinnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcandmelanoma
AT hwangweiting genesignatureofantigenprocessingandpresentationmachinerypredictsresponsetocheckpointblockadeinnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcandmelanoma
AT jeffriesseth genesignatureofantigenprocessingandpresentationmachinerypredictsresponsetocheckpointblockadeinnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcandmelanoma
AT huangalexander genesignatureofantigenprocessingandpresentationmachinerypredictsresponsetocheckpointblockadeinnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcandmelanoma
AT mitchelltarac genesignatureofantigenprocessingandpresentationmachinerypredictsresponsetocheckpointblockadeinnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcandmelanoma
AT langercoreyj genesignatureofantigenprocessingandpresentationmachinerypredictsresponsetocheckpointblockadeinnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcandmelanoma
AT albeldastevenm genesignatureofantigenprocessingandpresentationmachinerypredictsresponsetocheckpointblockadeinnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcandmelanoma