Cargando…

Interatrial block, P terminal force or fragmented QRS do not predict new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with severe chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of left atrial enlargement (LAE) and fragmented QRS (fQRS) diagnosed using ECG criteria in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unknown. Furthermore, there is limited data on predicting new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) with LAE or fQRS in this patient gro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hellman, Tapio, Hakamäki, Markus, Lankinen, Roosa, Koivuviita, Niina, Pärkkä, Jussi, Kallio, Petri, Kiviniemi, Tuomas, Airaksinen, K. E. Juhani, Järvisalo, Mikko J., Metsärinne, Kaj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33028216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01719-3
_version_ 1783591638927409152
author Hellman, Tapio
Hakamäki, Markus
Lankinen, Roosa
Koivuviita, Niina
Pärkkä, Jussi
Kallio, Petri
Kiviniemi, Tuomas
Airaksinen, K. E. Juhani
Järvisalo, Mikko J.
Metsärinne, Kaj
author_facet Hellman, Tapio
Hakamäki, Markus
Lankinen, Roosa
Koivuviita, Niina
Pärkkä, Jussi
Kallio, Petri
Kiviniemi, Tuomas
Airaksinen, K. E. Juhani
Järvisalo, Mikko J.
Metsärinne, Kaj
author_sort Hellman, Tapio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prevalence of left atrial enlargement (LAE) and fragmented QRS (fQRS) diagnosed using ECG criteria in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unknown. Furthermore, there is limited data on predicting new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) with LAE or fQRS in this patient group. METHODS: We enrolled 165 consecutive non-dialysis patients with CKD stage 4–5 without prior AF diagnosis between 2013 and 2017 in a prospective follow-up cohort study. LAE was defined as total P-wave duration ≥120 ms in lead II ± > 1 biphasic P-waves in leads II, III or aVF; or duration of terminal negative portion of P-wave > 40 ms or depth of terminal negative portion of P-wave > 1 mm in lead V(1) from a baseline ECG, respectively. fQRS was defined as the presence of a notched R or S wave or the presence of ≥1 additional R waves (R’) or; in the presence of a wide QRS complex (> 120 ms), > 2 notches in R or S waves in two contiguous leads corresponding to a myocardial region, respectively. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 59 (SD 14) years, 56/165 (33.9%) were female and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 12.8 ml/min/1.73m(2). Altogether 29/165 (17.6%) patients were observed with new-onset AF within median follow-up of 3 [IQR 3, range 2–6] years. At baseline, 137/165 (83.0%) and 144/165 (87.3%) patients were observed with LAE and fQRS, respectively. Furthermore, LAE and fQRS co-existed in 121/165 (73.3%) patients. Neither findings were associated with the risk of new-onset AF within follow-up. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of LAE and fQRS at baseline in this study on CKD stage 4–5 patients not on dialysis was very high. However, LAE or fQRS failed to predict occurrence of new-onset AF in these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7542943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75429432020-10-13 Interatrial block, P terminal force or fragmented QRS do not predict new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with severe chronic kidney disease Hellman, Tapio Hakamäki, Markus Lankinen, Roosa Koivuviita, Niina Pärkkä, Jussi Kallio, Petri Kiviniemi, Tuomas Airaksinen, K. E. Juhani Järvisalo, Mikko J. Metsärinne, Kaj BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The prevalence of left atrial enlargement (LAE) and fragmented QRS (fQRS) diagnosed using ECG criteria in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unknown. Furthermore, there is limited data on predicting new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) with LAE or fQRS in this patient group. METHODS: We enrolled 165 consecutive non-dialysis patients with CKD stage 4–5 without prior AF diagnosis between 2013 and 2017 in a prospective follow-up cohort study. LAE was defined as total P-wave duration ≥120 ms in lead II ± > 1 biphasic P-waves in leads II, III or aVF; or duration of terminal negative portion of P-wave > 40 ms or depth of terminal negative portion of P-wave > 1 mm in lead V(1) from a baseline ECG, respectively. fQRS was defined as the presence of a notched R or S wave or the presence of ≥1 additional R waves (R’) or; in the presence of a wide QRS complex (> 120 ms), > 2 notches in R or S waves in two contiguous leads corresponding to a myocardial region, respectively. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 59 (SD 14) years, 56/165 (33.9%) were female and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 12.8 ml/min/1.73m(2). Altogether 29/165 (17.6%) patients were observed with new-onset AF within median follow-up of 3 [IQR 3, range 2–6] years. At baseline, 137/165 (83.0%) and 144/165 (87.3%) patients were observed with LAE and fQRS, respectively. Furthermore, LAE and fQRS co-existed in 121/165 (73.3%) patients. Neither findings were associated with the risk of new-onset AF within follow-up. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of LAE and fQRS at baseline in this study on CKD stage 4–5 patients not on dialysis was very high. However, LAE or fQRS failed to predict occurrence of new-onset AF in these patients. BioMed Central 2020-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7542943/ /pubmed/33028216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01719-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hellman, Tapio
Hakamäki, Markus
Lankinen, Roosa
Koivuviita, Niina
Pärkkä, Jussi
Kallio, Petri
Kiviniemi, Tuomas
Airaksinen, K. E. Juhani
Järvisalo, Mikko J.
Metsärinne, Kaj
Interatrial block, P terminal force or fragmented QRS do not predict new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with severe chronic kidney disease
title Interatrial block, P terminal force or fragmented QRS do not predict new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with severe chronic kidney disease
title_full Interatrial block, P terminal force or fragmented QRS do not predict new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with severe chronic kidney disease
title_fullStr Interatrial block, P terminal force or fragmented QRS do not predict new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with severe chronic kidney disease
title_full_unstemmed Interatrial block, P terminal force or fragmented QRS do not predict new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with severe chronic kidney disease
title_short Interatrial block, P terminal force or fragmented QRS do not predict new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with severe chronic kidney disease
title_sort interatrial block, p terminal force or fragmented qrs do not predict new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with severe chronic kidney disease
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33028216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01719-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hellmantapio interatrialblockpterminalforceorfragmentedqrsdonotpredictnewonsetatrialfibrillationinpatientswithseverechronickidneydisease
AT hakamakimarkus interatrialblockpterminalforceorfragmentedqrsdonotpredictnewonsetatrialfibrillationinpatientswithseverechronickidneydisease
AT lankinenroosa interatrialblockpterminalforceorfragmentedqrsdonotpredictnewonsetatrialfibrillationinpatientswithseverechronickidneydisease
AT koivuviitaniina interatrialblockpterminalforceorfragmentedqrsdonotpredictnewonsetatrialfibrillationinpatientswithseverechronickidneydisease
AT parkkajussi interatrialblockpterminalforceorfragmentedqrsdonotpredictnewonsetatrialfibrillationinpatientswithseverechronickidneydisease
AT kalliopetri interatrialblockpterminalforceorfragmentedqrsdonotpredictnewonsetatrialfibrillationinpatientswithseverechronickidneydisease
AT kiviniemituomas interatrialblockpterminalforceorfragmentedqrsdonotpredictnewonsetatrialfibrillationinpatientswithseverechronickidneydisease
AT airaksinenkejuhani interatrialblockpterminalforceorfragmentedqrsdonotpredictnewonsetatrialfibrillationinpatientswithseverechronickidneydisease
AT jarvisalomikkoj interatrialblockpterminalforceorfragmentedqrsdonotpredictnewonsetatrialfibrillationinpatientswithseverechronickidneydisease
AT metsarinnekaj interatrialblockpterminalforceorfragmentedqrsdonotpredictnewonsetatrialfibrillationinpatientswithseverechronickidneydisease