Cargando…

Plasma AR Copy Number Changes and Outcome to Abiraterone and Enzalutamide

Introduction: Plasma androgen receptor (AR) copy number (CN) status identifies castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients with worse outcome on abiraterone/enzalutamide. However, the impact of AR CN changes on clinical outcome in CRPC is unknown. Materials and Methods: Plasma samples from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gurioli, Giorgia, Conteduca, Vincenza, Lolli, Cristian, Schepisi, Giuseppe, Gargiulo, Stefania, Altavilla, Amelia, Casadei, Chiara, Scarpi, Emanuela, De Giorgi, Ugo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072600
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.567809
_version_ 1783591647442894848
author Gurioli, Giorgia
Conteduca, Vincenza
Lolli, Cristian
Schepisi, Giuseppe
Gargiulo, Stefania
Altavilla, Amelia
Casadei, Chiara
Scarpi, Emanuela
De Giorgi, Ugo
author_facet Gurioli, Giorgia
Conteduca, Vincenza
Lolli, Cristian
Schepisi, Giuseppe
Gargiulo, Stefania
Altavilla, Amelia
Casadei, Chiara
Scarpi, Emanuela
De Giorgi, Ugo
author_sort Gurioli, Giorgia
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Plasma androgen receptor (AR) copy number (CN) status identifies castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients with worse outcome on abiraterone/enzalutamide. However, the impact of AR CN changes on clinical outcome in CRPC is unknown. Materials and Methods: Plasma samples from 73 patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide were collected at baseline and at the time of progression disease (PD). Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction was used to assess AR CN status. Results: We showed that 11 patients (15.1%) changed AR CN status from baseline to PD (9 patients from normal to gain, 2 from gain to normal). Patients changing AR CN status from normal at baseline to gain at PD had intermediate median overall survival (OS) of 20.5 months (95% CI = 8.0–44.2) between those who remained AR CN normal from baseline to PD (27.3 months [95% CI = 21.9–34.4]) and those who remained AR CN gain from baseline to PD (9.1 months [95% CI = 3.8–14.5], p < 0.0001). Patients changing AR CN from normal at baseline to gain at PD had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.2 months (95% CI = 2.0–14.7), patients who remained AR CN normal had a median PFS of 9.1 months (95% CI = 7.2–10.1), and patients who remained AR CN gain had a median PFS of 5.4 (95% CI = 3.6–6.5, p = 0.0005). Both OS and PFS were not significantly different between patients with AR CN that changes from normal to gain and patients with stable AR CN normal. Conclusions: We showed that CRPC patients changing AR CN status from baseline to progression time point had intermediate OS and we suggested that AR CN evaluation at baseline could be the most informative for clinical outcome of CRPC patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide. Larger prospective studies are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7542981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75429812020-10-16 Plasma AR Copy Number Changes and Outcome to Abiraterone and Enzalutamide Gurioli, Giorgia Conteduca, Vincenza Lolli, Cristian Schepisi, Giuseppe Gargiulo, Stefania Altavilla, Amelia Casadei, Chiara Scarpi, Emanuela De Giorgi, Ugo Front Oncol Oncology Introduction: Plasma androgen receptor (AR) copy number (CN) status identifies castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients with worse outcome on abiraterone/enzalutamide. However, the impact of AR CN changes on clinical outcome in CRPC is unknown. Materials and Methods: Plasma samples from 73 patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide were collected at baseline and at the time of progression disease (PD). Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction was used to assess AR CN status. Results: We showed that 11 patients (15.1%) changed AR CN status from baseline to PD (9 patients from normal to gain, 2 from gain to normal). Patients changing AR CN status from normal at baseline to gain at PD had intermediate median overall survival (OS) of 20.5 months (95% CI = 8.0–44.2) between those who remained AR CN normal from baseline to PD (27.3 months [95% CI = 21.9–34.4]) and those who remained AR CN gain from baseline to PD (9.1 months [95% CI = 3.8–14.5], p < 0.0001). Patients changing AR CN from normal at baseline to gain at PD had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.2 months (95% CI = 2.0–14.7), patients who remained AR CN normal had a median PFS of 9.1 months (95% CI = 7.2–10.1), and patients who remained AR CN gain had a median PFS of 5.4 (95% CI = 3.6–6.5, p = 0.0005). Both OS and PFS were not significantly different between patients with AR CN that changes from normal to gain and patients with stable AR CN normal. Conclusions: We showed that CRPC patients changing AR CN status from baseline to progression time point had intermediate OS and we suggested that AR CN evaluation at baseline could be the most informative for clinical outcome of CRPC patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide. Larger prospective studies are warranted. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7542981/ /pubmed/33072600 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.567809 Text en Copyright © 2020 Gurioli, Conteduca, Lolli, Schepisi, Gargiulo, Altavilla, Casadei, Scarpi and De Giorgi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Gurioli, Giorgia
Conteduca, Vincenza
Lolli, Cristian
Schepisi, Giuseppe
Gargiulo, Stefania
Altavilla, Amelia
Casadei, Chiara
Scarpi, Emanuela
De Giorgi, Ugo
Plasma AR Copy Number Changes and Outcome to Abiraterone and Enzalutamide
title Plasma AR Copy Number Changes and Outcome to Abiraterone and Enzalutamide
title_full Plasma AR Copy Number Changes and Outcome to Abiraterone and Enzalutamide
title_fullStr Plasma AR Copy Number Changes and Outcome to Abiraterone and Enzalutamide
title_full_unstemmed Plasma AR Copy Number Changes and Outcome to Abiraterone and Enzalutamide
title_short Plasma AR Copy Number Changes and Outcome to Abiraterone and Enzalutamide
title_sort plasma ar copy number changes and outcome to abiraterone and enzalutamide
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072600
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.567809
work_keys_str_mv AT gurioligiorgia plasmaarcopynumberchangesandoutcometoabirateroneandenzalutamide
AT conteducavincenza plasmaarcopynumberchangesandoutcometoabirateroneandenzalutamide
AT lollicristian plasmaarcopynumberchangesandoutcometoabirateroneandenzalutamide
AT schepisigiuseppe plasmaarcopynumberchangesandoutcometoabirateroneandenzalutamide
AT gargiulostefania plasmaarcopynumberchangesandoutcometoabirateroneandenzalutamide
AT altavillaamelia plasmaarcopynumberchangesandoutcometoabirateroneandenzalutamide
AT casadeichiara plasmaarcopynumberchangesandoutcometoabirateroneandenzalutamide
AT scarpiemanuela plasmaarcopynumberchangesandoutcometoabirateroneandenzalutamide
AT degiorgiugo plasmaarcopynumberchangesandoutcometoabirateroneandenzalutamide