Cargando…

Type 1 tympanoplasty in patients with large perforations: Comparison of temporalis fascia, partial-thickness cartilage, and full-thickness cartilage

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the results of different graft materials in type I tympanoplasty for patients with a large perforation of the tympanic membrane. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study on 180 patients with type I tympanoplasty. The patients were divided into three groups a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xing, Caixia, Liu, Hong, Li, Guodong, Li, Jianfeng, Li, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7543155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32790512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520945140
_version_ 1783591679998033920
author Xing, Caixia
Liu, Hong
Li, Guodong
Li, Jianfeng
Li, Xin
author_facet Xing, Caixia
Liu, Hong
Li, Guodong
Li, Jianfeng
Li, Xin
author_sort Xing, Caixia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the results of different graft materials in type I tympanoplasty for patients with a large perforation of the tympanic membrane. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study on 180 patients with type I tympanoplasty. The patients were divided into three groups according to the repair materials used. Age, sex, pre- and postoperative hearing levels, mean air–bone gap, rate of graft success, hearing gain, and the postoperative graft failure rate were evaluated. We continued to follow-up the patients to 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: The air conduction threshold was significantly higher before the operation than after the operation in the temporalis fascia, partial-thickness cartilage, and full-thickness cartilage groups. Although the hearing gain in the temporalis fascia group and the partial-thickness cartilage group was higher than that in the full-thickness cartilage group, there was no significant difference in the graft success rate among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Temporalis fascia, partial-thickness cartilage, and full-thickness cartilage can be used as appropriate transplantation materials for tympanoplasty type I in patients with a large perforation. Temporalis fascia and partial-thickness cartilage may be best for improvement of hearing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7543155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75431552020-10-20 Type 1 tympanoplasty in patients with large perforations: Comparison of temporalis fascia, partial-thickness cartilage, and full-thickness cartilage Xing, Caixia Liu, Hong Li, Guodong Li, Jianfeng Li, Xin J Int Med Res Retrospective Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the results of different graft materials in type I tympanoplasty for patients with a large perforation of the tympanic membrane. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study on 180 patients with type I tympanoplasty. The patients were divided into three groups according to the repair materials used. Age, sex, pre- and postoperative hearing levels, mean air–bone gap, rate of graft success, hearing gain, and the postoperative graft failure rate were evaluated. We continued to follow-up the patients to 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: The air conduction threshold was significantly higher before the operation than after the operation in the temporalis fascia, partial-thickness cartilage, and full-thickness cartilage groups. Although the hearing gain in the temporalis fascia group and the partial-thickness cartilage group was higher than that in the full-thickness cartilage group, there was no significant difference in the graft success rate among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Temporalis fascia, partial-thickness cartilage, and full-thickness cartilage can be used as appropriate transplantation materials for tympanoplasty type I in patients with a large perforation. Temporalis fascia and partial-thickness cartilage may be best for improvement of hearing. SAGE Publications 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7543155/ /pubmed/32790512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520945140 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Retrospective Clinical Research Report
Xing, Caixia
Liu, Hong
Li, Guodong
Li, Jianfeng
Li, Xin
Type 1 tympanoplasty in patients with large perforations: Comparison of temporalis fascia, partial-thickness cartilage, and full-thickness cartilage
title Type 1 tympanoplasty in patients with large perforations: Comparison of temporalis fascia, partial-thickness cartilage, and full-thickness cartilage
title_full Type 1 tympanoplasty in patients with large perforations: Comparison of temporalis fascia, partial-thickness cartilage, and full-thickness cartilage
title_fullStr Type 1 tympanoplasty in patients with large perforations: Comparison of temporalis fascia, partial-thickness cartilage, and full-thickness cartilage
title_full_unstemmed Type 1 tympanoplasty in patients with large perforations: Comparison of temporalis fascia, partial-thickness cartilage, and full-thickness cartilage
title_short Type 1 tympanoplasty in patients with large perforations: Comparison of temporalis fascia, partial-thickness cartilage, and full-thickness cartilage
title_sort type 1 tympanoplasty in patients with large perforations: comparison of temporalis fascia, partial-thickness cartilage, and full-thickness cartilage
topic Retrospective Clinical Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7543155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32790512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520945140
work_keys_str_mv AT xingcaixia type1tympanoplastyinpatientswithlargeperforationscomparisonoftemporalisfasciapartialthicknesscartilageandfullthicknesscartilage
AT liuhong type1tympanoplastyinpatientswithlargeperforationscomparisonoftemporalisfasciapartialthicknesscartilageandfullthicknesscartilage
AT liguodong type1tympanoplastyinpatientswithlargeperforationscomparisonoftemporalisfasciapartialthicknesscartilageandfullthicknesscartilage
AT lijianfeng type1tympanoplastyinpatientswithlargeperforationscomparisonoftemporalisfasciapartialthicknesscartilageandfullthicknesscartilage
AT lixin type1tympanoplastyinpatientswithlargeperforationscomparisonoftemporalisfasciapartialthicknesscartilageandfullthicknesscartilage