Cargando…

Helical ensembles outperform ideal helices in molecular replacement

The conventional approach in molecular replacement is the use of a related structure as a search model. However, this is not always possible as the availability of such structures can be scarce for poorly characterized families of proteins. In these cases, alternative approaches can be explored, suc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sánchez Rodríguez, Filomeno, Simpkin, Adam J., Davies, Owen R., Keegan, Ronan M., Rigden, Daniel J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Union of Crystallography 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7543657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33021498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S205979832001133X
_version_ 1783591708735307776
author Sánchez Rodríguez, Filomeno
Simpkin, Adam J.
Davies, Owen R.
Keegan, Ronan M.
Rigden, Daniel J.
author_facet Sánchez Rodríguez, Filomeno
Simpkin, Adam J.
Davies, Owen R.
Keegan, Ronan M.
Rigden, Daniel J.
author_sort Sánchez Rodríguez, Filomeno
collection PubMed
description The conventional approach in molecular replacement is the use of a related structure as a search model. However, this is not always possible as the availability of such structures can be scarce for poorly characterized families of proteins. In these cases, alternative approaches can be explored, such as the use of small ideal fragments that share high, albeit local, structural similarity with the unknown protein. Earlier versions of AMPLE enabled the trialling of a library of ideal helices, which worked well for largely helical proteins at suitable resolutions. Here, the performance of libraries of helical ensembles created by clustering helical segments is explored. The impacts of different B-factor treatments and different degrees of structural heterogeneity are explored. A 30% increase in the number of solutions obtained by AMPLE was observed when using this new set of ensembles compared with the performance with ideal helices. The boost in performance was notable across three different fold classes: transmembrane, globular and coiled-coil structures. Furthermore, the increased effectiveness of these ensembles was coupled to a reduction in the time required by AMPLE to reach a solution. AMPLE users can now take full advantage of this new library of search models by activating the ‘helical ensembles’ mode.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7543657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher International Union of Crystallography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75436572020-10-27 Helical ensembles outperform ideal helices in molecular replacement Sánchez Rodríguez, Filomeno Simpkin, Adam J. Davies, Owen R. Keegan, Ronan M. Rigden, Daniel J. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol Research Papers The conventional approach in molecular replacement is the use of a related structure as a search model. However, this is not always possible as the availability of such structures can be scarce for poorly characterized families of proteins. In these cases, alternative approaches can be explored, such as the use of small ideal fragments that share high, albeit local, structural similarity with the unknown protein. Earlier versions of AMPLE enabled the trialling of a library of ideal helices, which worked well for largely helical proteins at suitable resolutions. Here, the performance of libraries of helical ensembles created by clustering helical segments is explored. The impacts of different B-factor treatments and different degrees of structural heterogeneity are explored. A 30% increase in the number of solutions obtained by AMPLE was observed when using this new set of ensembles compared with the performance with ideal helices. The boost in performance was notable across three different fold classes: transmembrane, globular and coiled-coil structures. Furthermore, the increased effectiveness of these ensembles was coupled to a reduction in the time required by AMPLE to reach a solution. AMPLE users can now take full advantage of this new library of search models by activating the ‘helical ensembles’ mode. International Union of Crystallography 2020-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7543657/ /pubmed/33021498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S205979832001133X Text en © Sánchez Rodríguez et al. 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Papers
Sánchez Rodríguez, Filomeno
Simpkin, Adam J.
Davies, Owen R.
Keegan, Ronan M.
Rigden, Daniel J.
Helical ensembles outperform ideal helices in molecular replacement
title Helical ensembles outperform ideal helices in molecular replacement
title_full Helical ensembles outperform ideal helices in molecular replacement
title_fullStr Helical ensembles outperform ideal helices in molecular replacement
title_full_unstemmed Helical ensembles outperform ideal helices in molecular replacement
title_short Helical ensembles outperform ideal helices in molecular replacement
title_sort helical ensembles outperform ideal helices in molecular replacement
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7543657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33021498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S205979832001133X
work_keys_str_mv AT sanchezrodriguezfilomeno helicalensemblesoutperformidealhelicesinmolecularreplacement
AT simpkinadamj helicalensemblesoutperformidealhelicesinmolecularreplacement
AT daviesowenr helicalensemblesoutperformidealhelicesinmolecularreplacement
AT keeganronanm helicalensemblesoutperformidealhelicesinmolecularreplacement
AT rigdendanielj helicalensemblesoutperformidealhelicesinmolecularreplacement