Cargando…

Comparing covariation among vaccine hesitancy and broader beliefs within Twitter and survey data

Over the past decade, the percentage of adults in the United States who use some form of social media has roughly doubled, increasing from 36 percent in early 2009 to 72 percent in 2019. There has been a corresponding increase in research aimed at understanding opinions and beliefs that are expresse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nowak, Sarah A., Chen, Christine, Parker, Andrew M., Gidengil, Courtney A., Matthews, Luke J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7544030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33031405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239826
_version_ 1783591773333880832
author Nowak, Sarah A.
Chen, Christine
Parker, Andrew M.
Gidengil, Courtney A.
Matthews, Luke J.
author_facet Nowak, Sarah A.
Chen, Christine
Parker, Andrew M.
Gidengil, Courtney A.
Matthews, Luke J.
author_sort Nowak, Sarah A.
collection PubMed
description Over the past decade, the percentage of adults in the United States who use some form of social media has roughly doubled, increasing from 36 percent in early 2009 to 72 percent in 2019. There has been a corresponding increase in research aimed at understanding opinions and beliefs that are expressed online. However, the generalizability of findings from social media research is a subject of ongoing debate. Social media platforms are conduits of both information and misinformation about vaccines and vaccine hesitancy. Our research objective was to examine whether we can draw similar conclusions from Twitter and national survey data about the relationship between vaccine hesitancy and a broader set of beliefs. In 2018 we conducted a nationally representative survey of parents in the United States informed by a literature review to ask their views on a range of topics, including vaccine side effects, conspiracy theories, and understanding of science. We developed a set of keyword-based queries corresponding to each of the belief items from the survey and pulled matching tweets from 2017. We performed the data pull of the most recent full year of data in 2018. Our primary measures of belief covariation were the loadings and scores of the first principal components obtained using principal component analysis (PCA) from the two sources. We found that, after using manually coded weblinks in tweets to infer stance, there was good qualitative agreement between the first principal component loadings and scores using survey and Twitter data. This held true after we took the additional processing step of resampling the Twitter data based on the number of topics that an individual tweeted about, as a means of correcting for differential representation for elicited (survey) vs. volunteered (Twitter) beliefs. Overall, the results show that analyses using Twitter data may be generalizable in certain contexts, such as assessing belief covariation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7544030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75440302020-10-19 Comparing covariation among vaccine hesitancy and broader beliefs within Twitter and survey data Nowak, Sarah A. Chen, Christine Parker, Andrew M. Gidengil, Courtney A. Matthews, Luke J. PLoS One Research Article Over the past decade, the percentage of adults in the United States who use some form of social media has roughly doubled, increasing from 36 percent in early 2009 to 72 percent in 2019. There has been a corresponding increase in research aimed at understanding opinions and beliefs that are expressed online. However, the generalizability of findings from social media research is a subject of ongoing debate. Social media platforms are conduits of both information and misinformation about vaccines and vaccine hesitancy. Our research objective was to examine whether we can draw similar conclusions from Twitter and national survey data about the relationship between vaccine hesitancy and a broader set of beliefs. In 2018 we conducted a nationally representative survey of parents in the United States informed by a literature review to ask their views on a range of topics, including vaccine side effects, conspiracy theories, and understanding of science. We developed a set of keyword-based queries corresponding to each of the belief items from the survey and pulled matching tweets from 2017. We performed the data pull of the most recent full year of data in 2018. Our primary measures of belief covariation were the loadings and scores of the first principal components obtained using principal component analysis (PCA) from the two sources. We found that, after using manually coded weblinks in tweets to infer stance, there was good qualitative agreement between the first principal component loadings and scores using survey and Twitter data. This held true after we took the additional processing step of resampling the Twitter data based on the number of topics that an individual tweeted about, as a means of correcting for differential representation for elicited (survey) vs. volunteered (Twitter) beliefs. Overall, the results show that analyses using Twitter data may be generalizable in certain contexts, such as assessing belief covariation. Public Library of Science 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7544030/ /pubmed/33031405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239826 Text en © 2020 Nowak et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nowak, Sarah A.
Chen, Christine
Parker, Andrew M.
Gidengil, Courtney A.
Matthews, Luke J.
Comparing covariation among vaccine hesitancy and broader beliefs within Twitter and survey data
title Comparing covariation among vaccine hesitancy and broader beliefs within Twitter and survey data
title_full Comparing covariation among vaccine hesitancy and broader beliefs within Twitter and survey data
title_fullStr Comparing covariation among vaccine hesitancy and broader beliefs within Twitter and survey data
title_full_unstemmed Comparing covariation among vaccine hesitancy and broader beliefs within Twitter and survey data
title_short Comparing covariation among vaccine hesitancy and broader beliefs within Twitter and survey data
title_sort comparing covariation among vaccine hesitancy and broader beliefs within twitter and survey data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7544030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33031405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239826
work_keys_str_mv AT nowaksaraha comparingcovariationamongvaccinehesitancyandbroaderbeliefswithintwitterandsurveydata
AT chenchristine comparingcovariationamongvaccinehesitancyandbroaderbeliefswithintwitterandsurveydata
AT parkerandrewm comparingcovariationamongvaccinehesitancyandbroaderbeliefswithintwitterandsurveydata
AT gidengilcourtneya comparingcovariationamongvaccinehesitancyandbroaderbeliefswithintwitterandsurveydata
AT matthewslukej comparingcovariationamongvaccinehesitancyandbroaderbeliefswithintwitterandsurveydata