Cargando…

Outpatient Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND: The extensive nature of perforator-based breast reconstructions, combined with the need for postoperative flap monitoring, often leads to long hospitalizations. We present an early report demonstrating the feasibility and advantages of a modified operative technique and recovery protocol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martinez, Carlos A., Boutros, Sean G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7544295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33133958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003109
_version_ 1783591831501537280
author Martinez, Carlos A.
Boutros, Sean G.
author_facet Martinez, Carlos A.
Boutros, Sean G.
author_sort Martinez, Carlos A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The extensive nature of perforator-based breast reconstructions, combined with the need for postoperative flap monitoring, often leads to long hospitalizations. We present an early report demonstrating the feasibility and advantages of a modified operative technique and recovery protocol, allowing us to perform outpatient breast reconstructions with the DIEP flap. This follow-up comprises the experience gained, which is expanded to other perforator-based flaps and not limited to DIEP breast reconstructions. METHODS: We have implemented a general protocol in patients undergoing breast reconstruction with autologous flaps, promoting early mobilization and discharge by improving postoperative pain and decreasing opioid requirements. This protocol includes intraoperative local anesthesia, a microfascial incision for DIEP harvest with rib preservation, along with prophylactic anticoagulation. RESULTS: Ninety-two consecutive patients underwent autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction with DIEP, IGAP, and PAP flaps. No intraoperative complications were reported. All patients were discharged within 23 hours, without evidence of flap compromise. One patient required operative takeback for evacuation of a hematoma on postoperative day 4. No partial or total flap losses were documented. The aim of any procedure should be to get to the patient back to the preoperative status as quickly as possible, as prolonged hospitalizations are associated with higher incidences of infection, deep venous thrombosis, overall dissatisfaction, and higher overall costs of care. CONCLUSIONS: By using a modified operative technique, multimodal pain control, and postoperative anticoagulant therapy, outpatient perforator-flap–based breast reconstructions can be performed with high success and low complication rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7544295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75442952020-10-29 Outpatient Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Martinez, Carlos A. Boutros, Sean G. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Breast BACKGROUND: The extensive nature of perforator-based breast reconstructions, combined with the need for postoperative flap monitoring, often leads to long hospitalizations. We present an early report demonstrating the feasibility and advantages of a modified operative technique and recovery protocol, allowing us to perform outpatient breast reconstructions with the DIEP flap. This follow-up comprises the experience gained, which is expanded to other perforator-based flaps and not limited to DIEP breast reconstructions. METHODS: We have implemented a general protocol in patients undergoing breast reconstruction with autologous flaps, promoting early mobilization and discharge by improving postoperative pain and decreasing opioid requirements. This protocol includes intraoperative local anesthesia, a microfascial incision for DIEP harvest with rib preservation, along with prophylactic anticoagulation. RESULTS: Ninety-two consecutive patients underwent autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction with DIEP, IGAP, and PAP flaps. No intraoperative complications were reported. All patients were discharged within 23 hours, without evidence of flap compromise. One patient required operative takeback for evacuation of a hematoma on postoperative day 4. No partial or total flap losses were documented. The aim of any procedure should be to get to the patient back to the preoperative status as quickly as possible, as prolonged hospitalizations are associated with higher incidences of infection, deep venous thrombosis, overall dissatisfaction, and higher overall costs of care. CONCLUSIONS: By using a modified operative technique, multimodal pain control, and postoperative anticoagulant therapy, outpatient perforator-flap–based breast reconstructions can be performed with high success and low complication rates. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7544295/ /pubmed/33133958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003109 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Breast
Martinez, Carlos A.
Boutros, Sean G.
Outpatient Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
title Outpatient Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
title_full Outpatient Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
title_fullStr Outpatient Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Outpatient Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
title_short Outpatient Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
title_sort outpatient microsurgical breast reconstruction
topic Breast
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7544295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33133958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003109
work_keys_str_mv AT martinezcarlosa outpatientmicrosurgicalbreastreconstruction
AT boutrosseang outpatientmicrosurgicalbreastreconstruction