Cargando…

Core–periphery structure in directed networks

Empirical networks often exhibit different meso-scale structures, such as community and core–periphery structures. Core–periphery structure typically consists of a well-connected core and a periphery that is well connected to the core but sparsely connected internally. Most core–periphery studies fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elliott, Andrew, Chiu, Angus, Bazzi, Marya, Reinert, Gesine, Cucuringu, Mihai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7544362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33061788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2019.0783
_version_ 1783591840535019520
author Elliott, Andrew
Chiu, Angus
Bazzi, Marya
Reinert, Gesine
Cucuringu, Mihai
author_facet Elliott, Andrew
Chiu, Angus
Bazzi, Marya
Reinert, Gesine
Cucuringu, Mihai
author_sort Elliott, Andrew
collection PubMed
description Empirical networks often exhibit different meso-scale structures, such as community and core–periphery structures. Core–periphery structure typically consists of a well-connected core and a periphery that is well connected to the core but sparsely connected internally. Most core–periphery studies focus on undirected networks. We propose a generalization of core–periphery structure to directed networks. Our approach yields a family of core–periphery block model formulations in which, contrary to many existing approaches, core and periphery sets are edge-direction dependent. We focus on a particular structure consisting of two core sets and two periphery sets, which we motivate empirically. We propose two measures to assess the statistical significance and quality of our novel structure in empirical data, where one often has no ground truth. To detect core–periphery structure in directed networks, we propose three methods adapted from two approaches in the literature, each with a different trade-off between computational complexity and accuracy. We assess the methods on benchmark networks where our methods match or outperform standard methods from the literature, with a likelihood approach achieving the highest accuracy. Applying our methods to three empirical networks—faculty hiring, a world trade dataset and political blogs—illustrates that our proposed structure provides novel insights in empirical networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7544362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75443622020-10-14 Core–periphery structure in directed networks Elliott, Andrew Chiu, Angus Bazzi, Marya Reinert, Gesine Cucuringu, Mihai Proc Math Phys Eng Sci Special Feature Empirical networks often exhibit different meso-scale structures, such as community and core–periphery structures. Core–periphery structure typically consists of a well-connected core and a periphery that is well connected to the core but sparsely connected internally. Most core–periphery studies focus on undirected networks. We propose a generalization of core–periphery structure to directed networks. Our approach yields a family of core–periphery block model formulations in which, contrary to many existing approaches, core and periphery sets are edge-direction dependent. We focus on a particular structure consisting of two core sets and two periphery sets, which we motivate empirically. We propose two measures to assess the statistical significance and quality of our novel structure in empirical data, where one often has no ground truth. To detect core–periphery structure in directed networks, we propose three methods adapted from two approaches in the literature, each with a different trade-off between computational complexity and accuracy. We assess the methods on benchmark networks where our methods match or outperform standard methods from the literature, with a likelihood approach achieving the highest accuracy. Applying our methods to three empirical networks—faculty hiring, a world trade dataset and political blogs—illustrates that our proposed structure provides novel insights in empirical networks. The Royal Society Publishing 2020-09 2020-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7544362/ /pubmed/33061788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2019.0783 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Special Feature
Elliott, Andrew
Chiu, Angus
Bazzi, Marya
Reinert, Gesine
Cucuringu, Mihai
Core–periphery structure in directed networks
title Core–periphery structure in directed networks
title_full Core–periphery structure in directed networks
title_fullStr Core–periphery structure in directed networks
title_full_unstemmed Core–periphery structure in directed networks
title_short Core–periphery structure in directed networks
title_sort core–periphery structure in directed networks
topic Special Feature
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7544362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33061788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2019.0783
work_keys_str_mv AT elliottandrew coreperipherystructureindirectednetworks
AT chiuangus coreperipherystructureindirectednetworks
AT bazzimarya coreperipherystructureindirectednetworks
AT reinertgesine coreperipherystructureindirectednetworks
AT cucuringumihai coreperipherystructureindirectednetworks