Cargando…

Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of device and scan size on quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) metrics. METHODS: The 3 × 3 mm scans from Optovue AngioVue and Zeiss AngioPlex systems were included for 18 eyes of 18 subjects without ocular pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kraker, Jessica A., Omoba, Bisola S., Cava, Jenna A., Gilat Schmidt, Taly, Chui, Toco Y., Rosen, Richard B., Kim, Judy E., Carroll, Joseph, Linderman, Rachel E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33101784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.11.7
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of device and scan size on quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) metrics. METHODS: The 3 × 3 mm scans from Optovue AngioVue and Zeiss AngioPlex systems were included for 18 eyes of 18 subjects without ocular pathology. The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was segmented manually by two observers, from which estimates of FAZ area (using both the nominal image scale and the axial length corrected image scale) and acircularity were derived. Three scan sizes (3 mm, 6 mm HD, and 8 mm) from the AngioVue system were included for 15 eyes of 15 subjects without ocular pathology. For each subject, larger image sizes were resized to the same resolution as 3 × 3 mm scans, aligned, then cropped to a common area. FAZ area, FAZ acircularity, average and total parafoveal intercapillary area, vessel density, and vessel end points were computed. RESULTS: Between the devices used here, there were no significant differences in FAZ acircularity (P = 0.88) or FAZ area using scaled (P = 0.11) or unscaled images (P = 0.069). Although there was no significant difference in FAZ area across scan sizes (P = 0.30), vessel morphometry metrics were all significantly influenced by scan size. CONCLUSIONS: The scan devices and sizes used here do not affect FAZ area measures derived from manual segmentations. In contrast, vessel morphometry metrics are affected by scan size. As individual differences in axial length induce differences in absolute scan size, extreme care should be taken when interpreting metrics of vessel morphometry, both between and within OCT-A devices. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: A better characterization of the confounds surrounding OCT-A retinal vasculature metrics can lead to improved application of these metrics as biomarkers for retinal and systemic diseases.