Cargando…

Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of device and scan size on quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) metrics. METHODS: The 3 × 3 mm scans from Optovue AngioVue and Zeiss AngioPlex systems were included for 18 eyes of 18 subjects without ocular pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kraker, Jessica A., Omoba, Bisola S., Cava, Jenna A., Gilat Schmidt, Taly, Chui, Toco Y., Rosen, Richard B., Kim, Judy E., Carroll, Joseph, Linderman, Rachel E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33101784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.11.7
_version_ 1783591954548785152
author Kraker, Jessica A.
Omoba, Bisola S.
Cava, Jenna A.
Gilat Schmidt, Taly
Chui, Toco Y.
Rosen, Richard B.
Kim, Judy E.
Carroll, Joseph
Linderman, Rachel E.
author_facet Kraker, Jessica A.
Omoba, Bisola S.
Cava, Jenna A.
Gilat Schmidt, Taly
Chui, Toco Y.
Rosen, Richard B.
Kim, Judy E.
Carroll, Joseph
Linderman, Rachel E.
author_sort Kraker, Jessica A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of device and scan size on quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) metrics. METHODS: The 3 × 3 mm scans from Optovue AngioVue and Zeiss AngioPlex systems were included for 18 eyes of 18 subjects without ocular pathology. The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was segmented manually by two observers, from which estimates of FAZ area (using both the nominal image scale and the axial length corrected image scale) and acircularity were derived. Three scan sizes (3 mm, 6 mm HD, and 8 mm) from the AngioVue system were included for 15 eyes of 15 subjects without ocular pathology. For each subject, larger image sizes were resized to the same resolution as 3 × 3 mm scans, aligned, then cropped to a common area. FAZ area, FAZ acircularity, average and total parafoveal intercapillary area, vessel density, and vessel end points were computed. RESULTS: Between the devices used here, there were no significant differences in FAZ acircularity (P = 0.88) or FAZ area using scaled (P = 0.11) or unscaled images (P = 0.069). Although there was no significant difference in FAZ area across scan sizes (P = 0.30), vessel morphometry metrics were all significantly influenced by scan size. CONCLUSIONS: The scan devices and sizes used here do not affect FAZ area measures derived from manual segmentations. In contrast, vessel morphometry metrics are affected by scan size. As individual differences in axial length induce differences in absolute scan size, extreme care should be taken when interpreting metrics of vessel morphometry, both between and within OCT-A devices. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: A better characterization of the confounds surrounding OCT-A retinal vasculature metrics can lead to improved application of these metrics as biomarkers for retinal and systemic diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7545061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75450612020-10-23 Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics Kraker, Jessica A. Omoba, Bisola S. Cava, Jenna A. Gilat Schmidt, Taly Chui, Toco Y. Rosen, Richard B. Kim, Judy E. Carroll, Joseph Linderman, Rachel E. Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of device and scan size on quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) metrics. METHODS: The 3 × 3 mm scans from Optovue AngioVue and Zeiss AngioPlex systems were included for 18 eyes of 18 subjects without ocular pathology. The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was segmented manually by two observers, from which estimates of FAZ area (using both the nominal image scale and the axial length corrected image scale) and acircularity were derived. Three scan sizes (3 mm, 6 mm HD, and 8 mm) from the AngioVue system were included for 15 eyes of 15 subjects without ocular pathology. For each subject, larger image sizes were resized to the same resolution as 3 × 3 mm scans, aligned, then cropped to a common area. FAZ area, FAZ acircularity, average and total parafoveal intercapillary area, vessel density, and vessel end points were computed. RESULTS: Between the devices used here, there were no significant differences in FAZ acircularity (P = 0.88) or FAZ area using scaled (P = 0.11) or unscaled images (P = 0.069). Although there was no significant difference in FAZ area across scan sizes (P = 0.30), vessel morphometry metrics were all significantly influenced by scan size. CONCLUSIONS: The scan devices and sizes used here do not affect FAZ area measures derived from manual segmentations. In contrast, vessel morphometry metrics are affected by scan size. As individual differences in axial length induce differences in absolute scan size, extreme care should be taken when interpreting metrics of vessel morphometry, both between and within OCT-A devices. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: A better characterization of the confounds surrounding OCT-A retinal vasculature metrics can lead to improved application of these metrics as biomarkers for retinal and systemic diseases. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7545061/ /pubmed/33101784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.11.7 Text en Copyright 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Kraker, Jessica A.
Omoba, Bisola S.
Cava, Jenna A.
Gilat Schmidt, Taly
Chui, Toco Y.
Rosen, Richard B.
Kim, Judy E.
Carroll, Joseph
Linderman, Rachel E.
Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics
title Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics
title_full Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics
title_fullStr Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics
title_short Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics
title_sort assessing the influence of oct-a device and scan size on retinal vascular metrics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33101784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.11.7
work_keys_str_mv AT krakerjessicaa assessingtheinfluenceofoctadeviceandscansizeonretinalvascularmetrics
AT omobabisolas assessingtheinfluenceofoctadeviceandscansizeonretinalvascularmetrics
AT cavajennaa assessingtheinfluenceofoctadeviceandscansizeonretinalvascularmetrics
AT gilatschmidttaly assessingtheinfluenceofoctadeviceandscansizeonretinalvascularmetrics
AT chuitocoy assessingtheinfluenceofoctadeviceandscansizeonretinalvascularmetrics
AT rosenrichardb assessingtheinfluenceofoctadeviceandscansizeonretinalvascularmetrics
AT kimjudye assessingtheinfluenceofoctadeviceandscansizeonretinalvascularmetrics
AT carrolljoseph assessingtheinfluenceofoctadeviceandscansizeonretinalvascularmetrics
AT lindermanrachele assessingtheinfluenceofoctadeviceandscansizeonretinalvascularmetrics